Search

In conventional coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), metal artifacts are frequently observed where stents are located, making it difficult to evaluate in-stent restenosis. This study was conducted to investigate whether subtraction CCTA can improve diagnostic accuracy in the evaluation of in-stent restenosis. Subtraction CCTA was performed using 320-row CT in 398 patients with previously placed stents who were able to hold their breath for 25 s and in whom mid-diastolic prospective one-beat scanning was possible. Among these patients, 126 patients (94 men and 32 women, age 74 ± 8 years) with 370 stents who also underwent invasive coronary angiography (ICA) were selected as the subjects of this study. With ICA findings considered the gold standard, conventional CCTA was compared against subtraction CCTA to determine whether subtraction can improve diagnostic accuracy in the evaluation of in-stent restenosis. When non-assessable stents were considered to be stenotic, the diagnostic accuracy in the evaluation of in-stent restenosis was 62.7 % for conventional CCTA and 89.5 % for subtraction CCTA. When the non-assessable stents were considered to be non-stenotic the diagnostic accuracy was 90.3 % for conventional CCTA and 94.31 % for subtraction CCTA. When subtraction CCTA was used to evaluate only the 138 stents that were judged to be non-assessable by conventional CCTA, 116 of these stents were judged to be assessable, and the findings for 109 of them agreed with those obtained by ICA. Even for stents with an internal diameter of 2.5-3 mm, the lumen can be evaluated in more than 80 % of patients. Subtraction CCTA provides significantly higher diagnostic accuracy than conventional CCTA in the evaluation of in-stent restenosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To investigate the clinical usefulness of subtraction coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) in patients with severe calcification. A 320-row area detector CT system was used in this study. The subjects were 78 patients (47 men and 31 women, 739 years of age) with an Agatston score of >300 who were able to undergo prospective one-beat scanning during a single breath-hold. The CCTA findings were compared against invasive coronary angiography. The diagnostic capabilities of CCTA for the severely calcified segments with and without the additional information provided by subtraction CCTA were compared. Severe calcification was observed in 174 (31.9%) of the 546 segments, and non-assessable regions were observed in 74 (13.6%) of the segments. The addition of subtraction CCTA information improved the diagnostic accuracy for segments with severe calcification from 67.8 to 82.8% on a per-segment basis and from 70.1 to 82.1% on a per-patient basis, with non-assessable segments considered to be stenotic. When non-assessable segments were considered to be an incorrect diagnosis, the diagnostic accuracy was improved from 48.3 to 75.9% on a per-segment basis and from 43.3 to 79.1% on a per-patient basis. In addition, when evaluation was limited to non-assessable segments, subtraction CCTA provided a diagnostic accuracy of 81.1% when non-assessable segments were considered to be stenotic or 66.2% when non-assessable segments were considered to be an incorrect diagnosis. Subtraction CCTA improves the diagnostic capabilities of CCTA in patients with severe calcification. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To clarify the frequency and distribution pattern of calcifications in all and in only non-assessable coronary arterial segments in symptomatic patients with coronary heart disease. Materials and methods: Among 2355 consecutive coronary CT angiographies performed using a 320-row ADCT, 1129 studies performed by prospective one-beat scanning without metallic and motion artifacts were evaluated. Frequency and degree of calcification were assessed for each coronary segment. Evaluations were performed in all and in only non-assessable segments, and the results were compared. Results: Calcified segments were observed in 15.6 % of patients and 2.4 % of segments. The most extensively calcified segments were those in the proximal left anterior descending branch. 1.1 % of all of the segments were not assessable due to calcification, and 90 % of those non-assessable segments had high-grade calcifications. When the calcium score value was 1000 or 2000, the expected frequency of non-assessable segments was 27.5 or 53.5 %, respectively. Conclusion: There were specific features of the distribution of coronary arterial calcifications. It is important to be familiar with these features when deciding whether or not to perform subtraction CCTA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]