Search

Background: Early detection of BCR::ABL1-like ALL could impact treatment management and improve the overall survival/outcome. BCR::ABL1-like ALL cases are characterised by diverse genetic alterations activating cytokine receptors and kinase signalling. Its detection is still an unmet need in low–middle-income countries due to the unavailability of a patented TLDA assay. Methods: This study's rationale is to identify BCR::ABL1-like ALLs using the PHi-RACE classifier, followed by the characterisation of underlying adverse genetic alterations in recurrent gene abnormalities negative (RGAneg) B-ALLs (n = 108). Results: We identified 34.25% (37/108) BCR::ABL1-like ALLs using PHi-RACE classifier, characterised by TSLPR/CRLF2 expression (11.58%), IKZF1 (Δ4–7) deletion (18.9%) and chimeric gene fusions (34.61%). In overexpressed TSLPR/CRLF2 BCR::ABL1-like ALLs, we identified 33.33% (1/3) CRLF2::IGH and 33.33% (1/3) EPOR::IGH rearrangements with concomitant JAK2 mutation R683S (50%). We identified 18.91% CD13 (P = 0.02) and 27.02% CD33 (P = 0.05) aberrant myeloid markers positivity, which was significantly higher in BCR::ABL1-like ALLs compared to non-BCR::ABL1-like ALLs. MRD positivity was considerably higher (40% in BCR::ABL1-like vs. 19.29% in non-BCR::ABL1-like ALLs). Conclusions: With this practical approach, we reported a high incidence of BCR::ABL1-like ALLs, and a lower frequency of CRLF2 alteration & associated CGFs. Recognising this entity, early at diagnosis is crucial to optimise personalised treatment strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The overexpression of cytokine receptor-like factor-2 (CRLF2) identified by anti-thymic stromal lymphopoietin receptor/TSLPR flow cytometry (FCM) has been reported as a screening tool for the identification of BCR-ABL1-like B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia/B-ALL with CRLF2 re-arrangement. TSLPR expression was studied prospectively in consecutive 478 B-ALLs (≤ 12 years (n = 244); 13–25 years (n = 129); > 25 years (n = 105)) and correlated with various hematological parameters and end-of-induction measurable residual disease (day 29; MRD ≥ 0.01% by 10-color FCM). TSLPR positivity in ≥ 10% leukemic cells was detected in 14.6% (n = 70) of B-ALLs. CRLF2 re-arrangement was detected in eight cases (11.4%) including P2RY8-CRLF2 (n = 6), and IgH-CRLF2 (n = 2) with a median TSLPR positivity of 48.8% and 99% leukemic cells, respectively. Recurrent gene fusions/RGF (BCR-ABL1 (17.1%); ETV6-RUNX1 (4.2%), TCF3-PBX1 (1.4%)), other BCR-ABL1-like chimeric gene fusions/CGFs (PDGFRB-rearrangement (2.9%), IgH-EPOR (1.4%)), CRLF2 extra-copies/hyperdiploidy (17.1%), and IgH translocation without a known partner (10%) were also detected in TSLPR-positive patients. CD20 positivity (52.9% vs 38.5%; p = 0.02) as well as iAMP21 (4.3% vs 0.5%; p = 0.004) was significantly more frequent in TSLPR-positive cases. TSLPR-positive patients did not show a significantly higher MRD, compared to TSLPR-negative cases (37% vs 33%). Increasing the threshold cut-off (from ≥ 10 to > 50% or > 74%) increased the specificity to 88% and 100% respectively in identifying CRLF2 translocation. TSLPR expression is not exclusive for CRLF2 translocations and can be seen with various other RGFs, necessitating their testing before its application in diagnostic algorithms. In patients with high TSLPR positivity (> 50%), the testing may be restricted to CRLF2 aberrancies, while patients with 10–50% TSLPR positivity need to be tested for both CRLF2- and non-CRLF2 BCR-ABL1-like CGFs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]