Search

Differences in organization of the primary motor cortex and altered trunk motor control (sensing, processing and motor output) have been reported in people with low back pain (LBP). Little is known to what extent these differences are related. We investigated differences in 1) organization of the primary motor cortex and 2) motor and sensory tests between people with and without LBP, and 3) investigated associations between the organization of the primary motor cortex and motor and sensory tests. We conducted a case-control study in people with (N=25) and without (N=25) LBP. The organization of the primary motor cortex (Center of Gravity (CoG) and Area of the cortical representation of trunk muscles) was assessed using neuronavigated transcranial magnetic stimulation, based on individual MRIs. Sensory tests (quantitative sensory testing, graphaesthesia, two-point discrimination threshold) and a motor test (spiral-tracking test) were assessed. Participants with LBP had a more lateral and lower location of the CoG and a higher temporal summation of pain. For all participants combined, better vibration test scores were associated with a more anterior, lateral, and lower CoG and a better two-point discrimination threshold was associated with a lower CoG. A small subset of variables showed significance. Although this aligns with the concept of altered organization of the primary motor cortex in LBP, there is no strong evidence of the association between altered organization of the primary motor cortex and motor and sensory test performance in LBP. Focusing on subgroup analyses regarding pain duration can be a topic for future research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: We sought to assess the impact of coronary revascularization on myocardial perfusion and fractional flow reserve (FFR) in patients without a cardiac history, with prior myocardial infarction (MI) or non-MI percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Furthermore, we studied the impact of scar tissue. Methods: Symptomatic patients underwent [15O]H2O positron emission tomography (PET) and FFR before and after revascularization. Patients with prior CAD, defined as prior MI or PCI, underwent scar quantification by magnetic resonance imaging late gadolinium enhancement. Results: Among 137 patients (87% male, age 62.2 ± 9.5 years) 84 (61%) had a prior MI or PCI. The increase in FFR and hyperemic myocardial blood flow (hMBF) was less in patients with prior MI or non-MI PCI compared to those without a cardiac history (FFR: 0.23 ± 0.14 vs. 0.20 ± 0.12 vs. 0.31 ± 0.18, p = 0.02; hMBF: 0.54 ± 0.75 vs. 0.62 ± 0.97 vs. 0.91 ± 0.96 ml/min/g, p = 0.04). Post-revascularization FFR and hMBF were similar across patients without a cardiac history or with prior MI or non-MI PCI. An increase in FFR was strongly associated to hMBF increase in patients without a cardiac history or with prior MI/non-MI PCI (r = 0.60 and r = 0.60, p < 0.01 for both). Similar results were found for coronary flow reserve. In patients with prior MI scar was negatively correlated to hMBF increase and independently predictive of an attenuated CFR increase. Conclusions: Post revascularization FFR and perfusion were similar among patients without a cardiac history, with prior MI or non-MI PCI. In patients with prior MI scar burden was associated to an attenuated perfusion increase. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Although sleep is essential for (recovery of) health, it is adversely affected by hospitalization, due to disease discomfort, environmental noise, and care routines, causing reduced sleep and increased disturbances. This study evaluates factors affecting sleep quality and quantity in hospitalized children and compares inpatient sleep with sleep at home. Using an observational, prospective study design, we assessed sleep in hospitalized children aged 1–12 years, admitted to a tertiary center, and compared this with home 6–8 weeks after discharge. We measured total sleep time (TST), sleep onset latency (SOL), wake after sleep onset (WASO), sleep efficiency, awakenings, and subjective sleep quality, using actigraphy, sleep diaries, and PROMIS questionnaires. We explored an array of sleep-disturbing factors. Regression analyses identified key determinants affecting sleep patterns, while mixed linear models compared sleep in hospital to sleep at home. Out of 621 eligible patients, 467 were invited, and 272 (58%) consented to participate. Key determinants of sleep included pain, number of previous admissions, (underlying) chronic illness, and environment-, staff-, and disease-related factors. Parents reported lower perceived sleep quality in the hospital compared to at home, 97-min (SE 9) lower TST, 100-min (5) longer WASO, more difficulties with falling asleep, lower sleep satisfaction, and more awakenings. Actigraphy outcomes revealed shorter TST (20 min (6)), but better sleep efficiency and fewer awakenings in the hospital.Conclusion: Sleep in hospital was compromised in comparison to sleep at home, primarily due to disturbances related to treatment, environment, and staff. These findings underscore the necessity and potential of relative simple interventions to improve sleep quality and minimize sleep disturbances in hospitalized children. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]