Search

Background: Anastomotic strictures following colectomy and proctectomy are a significant cause of benign lower gastrointestinal tract (LGIT) obstruction, with a reported incidence of up to 30%. Endoscopic interventions such as balloon dilation, stricturotomy, mechanical dilation, electrocautery incision, and stent placement are utilized for management. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic interventions for the management of benign LGIT anastomotic strictures. Methods: Literature search was performed for published full-text articles using the Embase, Pubmed, Web of Sciences, and Cochrane databases for endoscopic management of anastomosis strictures and related terms including endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD), stricturotomy (EST), mechanical dilation, electrocautery incision (ECI), and stent placement. Results: A total of 1363 patients from 33 studies were included. The most common indication for anastomosis was colorectal cancer (92%). Overall technical success (ability to pass the endoscope) was achieved in 93% of cases, with immediate clinical success in 85% and sustained success in 81% at follow-up. ECI demonstrated the highest clinical success rates (98% immediate, 91% at the end of follow-up). Adverse events occurred in 6% of patients, most commonly perforation, which was most frequent with EBD. Stent placement showed high initial success but had issues with stent migration and adverse events. Conclusion: Overall, EBD and ECI were the most effective, with ECI showing the highest success rates. Despite its technical challenges, EST was both effective and safe. This study underscores the need for further prospective research comparing various endoscopic interventions to improve management strategies for LGIT anastomotic strictures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: An anastomotic stricture after colorectal surgery is principally managed by endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD). Although this intervention is effective, however, subsequent procedures or surgical interventions are often required. This study aimed to assess the long-term outcomes of EBD for anastomotic stricture arising from colorectal cancer surgery. Materials and methods: We analyzed 173 patients who received curative surgery for colorectal cancer at our hospital between January 2000 and December 2022 and had undergone EBD to manage anastomotic stricture. The medical records of these cases were retrospectively reviewed to assess the outcomes and risk factors for restenosis and permanent stoma. Results: Of the 173 study patients, 41 (23.7%) presented with restenosis with a median time to recurrence of 49 [37–150] days. The restenosis group was significantly younger (55.6 years versus 60.8 years), with a more prominent rectal location (80.5% versus 57.6%), a higher incidence of hand-sewn anastomosis (24.4% versus 5.3%), and a higher percentage of neoadjuvant radiotherapy (34.1% versus 5.3%, P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis indicated neoadjuvant radiotherapy (adjusted HR 2.48; 95% CI 1.03–5.95) and cerebral vascular disease (adjusted HR 6.97; 95% CI 2.15–22.54) as independent prognostic factors for restenosis. Fourteen patients (8.1%) required a permanent stoma due to treatment failure. All cases needing a permanent stoma were male (14 patients, 100%, P = 0.007) and this group had a higher rate of neoadjuvant radiotherapy, adjuvant chemotherapy, and hand-sewn anastomosis. Conclusion: Patients receiving neoadjuvant radiotherapy are most prone to restenosis after an EBD intervention to manage an anastomotic stricture. Neoadjuvant radiotherapy is also a strong risk factor for requiring a permanent stomas due to treatment failure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To compare the long-term effectiveness, complications, and outcomes of primary obstructive megaureter (POM) treated by endoscopic balloon dilation under fluoroscopic guidance versus not using radioscopy during the procedure. Patients and methods: A comparative study between POM cases treated at our institution by endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) under fluoroscopic guidance (FG) (n = 43) vs no fluoroscopic guidance (NFG) (n = 48) between the years 2004 and 2018 was conducted. The procedure in FG consisted of performing a retrograde pyelography before dilation. Then, a guidewire is introduced to the renal pelvis, and the dilation of the vesicoureteral junction is performed using high-pressure balloon catheters under fluoroscopic vision. Finally, a double-J stent is placed between the renal pelvis and bladder. The procedure in NFG was performed exclusively under cystoscopic vision without radiological exposure. Complications, outcomes, and success rates were analyzed using Spearman's correlation test. Mean follow-up was 12.5 ± 2.2 years in FG and 6.4 ± 1.3 years in NFG. Results: MAG-3 showed significant differences in renal drainage before and after endoscopic treatment in both groups (p < 0.001 T-test). Statistical analysis did not reveal differences between groups in initial technical failure (r: − 0.035, p = 0.74), early postoperative complications (r: − 0.029, p = 0.79), secondary VUR (r: 0.033, p = 0.76), re-stenosis (r: 0.022, p = 0.84), long-term ureteral reimplantation (r: 0.065, p = 0.55), and final outcome (r: − 0.054, p = 0.61). The endoscopic approach of POM had a long-term success rate of 86.5% in FG VS 89.6% in NFG. Conclusions: Endoscopic balloon dilation of POM can be done with no radiation exposure with similar results, effectiveness, and outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The most established treatments for achalasia are endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) and laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM). This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes and long-term quality of life of patients treated with EBD or LHM. Our study was a cross-sectional study on patients with idiopathic achalasia referred to the manometry center of Khorshid Hospital from 2018 to 2020. First, clinical and demographic data of patients were asked and supplemented by HRQOL (health-related quality of life questionnaire) and Eckardt questionnaires. In a 1-year follow-up, patients were called again and asked about the treatment choice (EBD or LHM), and clinical symptom improvement, quality of life, the asymptomatic period after treatment, and failure of the procedure were assessed. Of a total of 100 patients, 63 (63%) were men, and the mean age was 43.48 SD 8.76. The EBD procedure was conducted for 43 (43%). After 1 year of follow-up, the mean delta Eckardt score and the mean relative effect for Eckardt were significantly better for the LHM group. However, the mean delta HRQOL score and the mean relative effect for HRQOL for both groups were not significantly different. The total number of treatment failures was 9 (9%), which was significantly higher in the EBD group. The mean asymptomatic period after the procedure was significantly higher in the LHM group. Both EBD and LHM methods have a noticeable effect on symptom improvement, but LHM had better results in symptom improvement, treatment failure, and asymptomatic period time after the procedure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) has emerged as an alternative intervention to manage Crohn's disease (CD) strictures. We determined the cost-effectiveness of EBD versus resection surgery for patients with short (< 4–5 cm) primary or secondary/anastomotic small or large bowel strictures. Methods: A microsimulation state-transition model analyzed the benefits and risks of EBD and resection surgery for patients with primary or anastomotic CD strictures. Our primary outcome was quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) over ten years, and strategies were compared using a willingness to pay of $100,000/QALY from a societal perspective. Costs (2021 $US) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) were calculated. Deterministic 1-way and probabilistic analyses assessed model uncertainty. Results: The EBD strategy cost $19,822 and resulted in 6.18 QALYs while the surgery strategy cost $41,358 and resulted in 6.37 QALYs. Surgery had an ICER of $113,332 per QALY, making EBD a cost-effective strategy. The median number of EBDs was 5 in the EBD strategy and 0 in the surgery strategy. The median number of surgeries was 2 in the surgery strategy and 1 in the EBD strategy. Of individuals who initially received EBD, 50.4% underwent subsequent surgery. One-way sensitivity analyses showed that the probabilities of requiring repeated interventions, surgery mortality (< 0.7%), and quality of life after interventions were the most influential model parameters. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses favored EBD in 50.9% of iterations. Conclusions: EBD is a cost-effective strategy for managing CD strictures. Differences in patient risk and quality of life after intervention impact cost-effectiveness. Intervention decisions should consider cost-effectiveness, patient risks, and quality of life. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection can cause esophageal strictures. Endoscopic balloon dilation is the standard treatment for esophageal strictures, but has complications, including perforation, and sometimes requires surgery. We report a case of perforation during endoscopic balloon dilation for esophageal stricture secondary to esophageal submucosal dissection that was successfully treated conservatively. A 66-year-old man with superficial carcinoma in the upper thoracic esophagus underwent circumferential endoscopic submucosal dissection with local steroid injections. Endoscopic balloon dilation was performed weekly for esophageal stricture. However, during the sixth procedure, an attempt to increase the size of the balloon to 13.5 mm resulted in perforation. The patient was treated conservatively using polyglycolic acid sheet with fibrin glue at the perforation site, which was fixed using an endoclip. However, the esophageal stricture persisted after the perforation was closed and Endoscopic balloon dilation was carefully repeated twice weekly up to a maximum of 17 mm, and the endoscope was able to pass through, and associated symptoms improved. This report indicates that endoscopic tissue shielding using polyglycolic acid sheet with fibrin glue and endoclip to correct perforation, followed by additional endoscopic balloon dilation, is an alternative to surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: There is no information regarding the outcome of Crohn's disease (CD) patients treated with endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) in non-referral hospitals, nor on the efficacy of EBD in ulcerative colitis (UC). We report herein the results of the largest series published to date.Aim: To assess the efficacy and safety of EBD for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) stenosis performed in 19 hospitals with different levels of complexity and to determine factors related to therapeutic success.Methods: We identified IBD patients undergoing EBD in the ENEIDA database. Efficacy of EBD was compared between CD and UC and between secondary and tertiary hospitals. Predictive factors of therapeutic success were assessed with multivariate analysis.Results: Four-hundred dilations (41.2% anastomotic) were performed in 187 IBD patients (13 UC/Indeterminate colitis). Technical and therapeutic success per dilation was achieved in 79.5% and 55.3%, respectively. Therapeutic success per patient was achieved in 78.1% of cases (median follow-up: 40 months) with 49.7% requiring more than one dilation. No differences related to either diagnosis or hospital complexity was found. Technical success [OR 4.12 (95%CI 2.4-7.1)] and not receiving anti-TNF at the time of dilation [OR 1.7 (95% CI 1.1-2.6)] were independently related to therapeutic success per dilation. A stricture length ≤ 2 cm [HR 2.43 (95% CI 1.11-5.31)] was a predictive factor of long-term success per patient. The rate of major complications was 1.3%.Conclusions: EBD can be performed with similar efficacy and safety in hospitals with differing levels of complexity and it might be a suitable treatment for UC with short stenosis. To achieve a technical success and the short length of the stenosis seem to be critical for long-term therapeutic success. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Balloon dilation (BD) is a simple, effective procedure for postoperative benign bilioenteric strictures (BBESs). Factors associated with BBES recurrence after endoscopic BD have not been studied adequately. This study examined the outcomes and 1-year recurrence factors in patients with BBES who underwent endoscopic BD.Methods: Patients who underwent endoscopic BD as an initial treatment between April 2008 and March 2017 were retrospectively assessed. The median time to recurrence of BBES (RBBES) and recurrence factors were evaluated.Results: The study group comprised 55 patients (median age 72 years). The rate of RBBES was 52.7% (29/55), and the median time to RBBES was 2.78 years (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.17-4.40). RBBES was observed in 32.7% (18/55) within 1 year after endoscopic BD. The significant factors associated with recurrence within 1 year, revealed by multivariate analysis, were: postoperative bile leak (p = 0.001; hazard ratio [HR] 10.94; 95% CI 2.47-48.39); BBES onset within 6 months, postoperatively (p = 0.013; HR 6.18; 95% CI 1.46-26.21); no intrahepatic stones (p = 0.049; HR 3.05; 95% CI 1.01-9.22); and remaining balloon waist (p = 0.005; HR 5.71; 95% CI 1.69-19.31). The median time to RBBES was significantly shorter in patients with these recurrence factors (0.88 years vs. not reached, p = 0.004). Patients exhibiting at least two recurrence factors were significantly more likely to experience recurrence (p < 0.001).Conclusion: Endoscopic BD is effective for BBES, especially for patients with no recurrence factors. Consideration of endoscopic BD and additional treatment may be necessary for patients with recurrence factors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) is an established therapy for esophageal stenosis. To assess its usefulness in children, we reviewed 11 years of pediatric cases of EBD in our hospital. Over the last 11 years, EBD was performed on 14 pediatric patients (10 boys and four girls; 7 months-11 years) at our hospital. All EBD sessions were performed under general anesthesia and fluoroscopic monitoring. The sessions were repeated every week or alternate weeks until resolution of dysphagia or development of smooth endoscope passage. Stenosis was resolved in 14 of 14 patients (100%). None of the patients (0%) showed recurrence of stenosis. As for postoperative complications, mediastinitis occurred only in one patient (7.1%). The median number of session repeats for an individual patient was three (range 1-10). EBD is a safe and effective therapeutic modality for esophageal stenosis in children. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: TNF blockers are approved for intravenous or subcutaneous systemic therapy of many chronic inflammatory diseases. As it is not possible to achieve a sufficient local clinical improvement through systemic therapy in every patient, diverse approaches of topical therapy using TNF blockers have been investigated in recent years. Methods: In this paper, we report on long-term clinical results of originator infliximab (IFX) injections into symptomatic combined scarring and inflammatory stenoses of the rectum in two patients with Crohn's disease. Aiming at high tissue IFX levels, 25 mg of IFX was injected into each quadrant of the stenosis after endoscopic balloon dilatation. This off-label treatment was repeated as necessary, depending on the clinical success. Results: Topic IFX injection after balloon dilation reduced imperative stool pressure, isolated episodes of incontinence and incomplete emptying. Improvement lasted between 4 and 14 weeks in one patient and the treatment was repeated 13 times in the following 6.6 years. In the other patient, the technique was necessary only twice with no symptom recurrence in the subsequent 5.3 years. Conclusion: Our experience suggests that topic application of a systemically approved anti-TNF substance may be a successful individualized therapy for refractory stenosis of the rectum in patients with Crohn's disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Few articles focused on endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) in the management of Crohn's strictures in the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract.Aims: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of EBD for Crohn's strictures in the upper GI tract and to determine early predictors of response and surgical intervention.Methods: All eligible patients who underwent EBD for Crohn's strictures in the upper GI tract were retrospectively reviewed. The long-term success was defined as the recovery of normal diets without surgical intervention over the follow-up period. In order to seek early predictors, patients who achieved long-term success were compared with those who didn't.Results: A total of 67 dilations of upper GI strictures were performed between June 2011 and March 2015 on 24 patients (mean age 25.6 ± 6.7, 20 male) with Crohn's disease. Technical success was achieved in 62 of 67 dilations (92.5 %) with a complication rate of 3 %. After the median follow-up period of 23.0 months (range 6.2-51.2 months), nine patients underwent surgical intervention, nine patients were still depending on tube feeding; in the meantime, only six (25 %) patients achieved long-term success. Additionally, patients who remained 1 month intervention-free (55.6 vs. 5.9 %, P = 0.015) were more likely to achieve long-term success.Conclusions: EBD was a safe procedure, but not a potent therapy for Crohn's upper GI strictures. Meanwhile, 1-month response could serve as an early predictor of the long-term response. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Pyloric exclusion may be implemented in the setting of a high-grade duodenal or pancreatic injury. After exclusion, the pylorus should spontaneously open in 3-6 weeks. However, we present the case of a critically ill 17-year-old male with a gunshot wound to the abdomen that underwent stapled pyloric exclusion with gastrostomy and jejunostomy tube placement who did not achieve pyloric patency after 5 months, and describe an innovative "double-endoscope" technique to correct it.Methods: A gastroscope was inserted through the mouth into the stomach, and an endoscope was inserted retrograde through the jejunostomy site to the duodenum. The closed pylorus was seen from both ends with transillumination. A needle knife was pushed through the membrane with clear visualization from the contralateral side. A balloon dilation catheter was then passed over a guidewire, and the neopylorus was sequentially dilated. A gastrojejunostomy tube was placed to ensure patency of the neopylorus. Postoperative imaging showed no evidence of leak or pneumoperitoneum. Serial endoscopic dilations were performed every 1-4 weeks to prevent restricturing.Results: The patient recovered well. After the first follow-up endoscopic dilation, he was eating a regular diet and had no retained food products. After four endoscopic dilations, the patient remained symptom free and the pylorus was widely patent. His gastrostomy and jejunostomy tubes were removed.Conclusions: Here we presented a rare complication of pyloric exclusion and an innovative approach that used a "double-endoscope" technique and serial endoscopic dilations to establish and maintain a neopylorus, avoiding the morbidity of a major surgical procedure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The incidence of anastomotic stenosis ranges from 26 to 42 % in patients who have undergone esophagectomy. Stenosis reduces patient quality of life and requires multiple endoscopic balloon dilations (EBDs). We investigated the effects of EBD with intralesional steroid injection on anastomotic re-stenosis after EBD. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 30 esophageal cancer patients who experienced anastomotic stricture after primary surgical resection. All patients had subtotal esophagectomy and cervical anastomosis with retrosternal reconstruction route. The diagnosis of anastomotic stenosis was based on a dysphagia score of 2 or more. Ten patients were treated with EBD and endoscopic corticosteroid injections (steroid group), and 20 were treated with only endoscopic balloon dilation (control group). In the steroid group, triamcinolone acetonide was evenly injected around the anastomosis. We compared the clinical outcomes. Results: The number of EBDs, measured from the beginning to the release of stricture, was significantly lower in the steroid group than in the control group [2.5 (1-6) vs. 4.5 (1-20), p = 0.033]. Moreover, the period between the first dilatation and the release from stenosis in the steroid group was significantly shorter than that in the control group [58.5 days (0-142 days) vs 94.5 days (0-518 days), p = 0.047]. Bleeding occurred at the anastomotic site in one case in the steroid group, but was completely controlled by endoscopic hemostasis. No other complications were observed in both groups. Conclusions: Intralesional steroid injection with EBD for treating anastomotic stenosis after esophagectomy is beneficial for reducing the number of repeat EBDs performed and shortening the period before release from stenosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Endoscopic balloon dilation combined with stenting has been increasingly used in managing biliary anastomotic strictures (BAS) after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). However, data on the efficacy and safety vary among different studies. To obtain reliable estimates for the efficacy and safety of this endoscopic combination therapy in post-OLT BAS. A systematic search was conducted in the literature published until June 2012. The outcomes of individual study were transformed into comparable data using the Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation method. Fixed-effect or random-effect models were built to simulate the outcomes. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression were used to explore the sources of clinical heterogeneity. Clinical resolution and recurrence were defined as the primary outcomes and complications and mortality as secondary outcomes. Nineteen studies (15 retrospective, 4 prospective; 17 full-texts, 2 abstracts) were included, with a total of 745 patients. Fully covered self-expandable metal stent was only reported in one study, achieving a resolution rate of 92.3 %, recurrence rate of 8.3 %, and complication rate of 7.7 %. For 18 studies using plastic stents, the pooled resolution rate was 86 % (95 % CI 80-91 %; I = 74.7 %). Abstracts, study design, and the delay from OLT to BAS diagnosis were contributing factors for heterogeneity in resolution. The pooled recurrence rate was 9 % (95 % CI 5-13 %; I = 59.6 %). Longer stenting duration predicted less recurrence (OR = 0.95, p = 0.002). The pooled complication rate was 14 % (95 % CI 8-21 %, I = 71.2 %). No procedure-related mortality was reported. Endoscopic balloon dilation combined with stenting is a relatively effective and safe modality in post-OLT BAS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The double-stapling technique (DST) for esophagojejunostomy using the transorally inserted anvil (OrVil; Covidien Japan, Tokyo, Japan) is one of the reconstruction methods used after laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy (LATG). This technique has potential advantages in terms of less invasive surgery without the need to create a complicated intraabdominal anastomosis. Methods: From 2008 to 2011, 262 patients with gastric cancer underwent total gastrectomy and reconstruction with a Roux-en-Y anastomosis, and 52 patients underwent LATG with DST. A retrospective analysis then was performed comparing the patients who experienced postoperative stenosis after LATG-DST (positive group) and the patients who did not (negative group). A comparative analysis was performed among patients comparing conventional open total gastrectomy and LATG, and multivariate analysis was performed to evaluate risk factors for the development of anastomotic stenosis. Results: A minor leak was found in 1 patient (1.9 %), and 11 patients experienced anastomotic stenosis (21 %) after LATG with DST. Among the patients with anastomotic stenosis, three (3/4, 75 %) anastomoses were performed with the 21-mm end-to-end anastomosis (EEA) stapler, and eight anastomoses were performed (8/47, 17 %) with the 25-mm EEA stapler. The median interval to the diagnosis of anastomotic stenosis was 43 days after surgery. The patients with stenosis needed endoscopic balloon dilation an average of four times, and the rate of perforation after dilation was 13 %. The clinical and operative characteristics did not differ between the two groups. Anastomotic stenosis after open total gastrectomy occurred in two cases (0.98 %). Multivariate analysis showed that the size of the EEA stapler and the use of DST were risk factors for anastomotic stenosis. Conclusion: Esophagojejunostomy using DST with OrVil is useful in performing a minimally invasive procedure but carries a high risk of anastomotic stenosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Der Gastroenterologe is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background and aims: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is the most frequent technique performed in bariatric surgery. Gastrojejunal anastomotic stricture is one of the most common postoperative complications. The aims of this study were to evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic balloon dilation in the treatment of the gastrojejunal anastomotic strictures after LRYGB and to look for predicting factors that would indicate the need of repeated dilations. Methods: We included all patients with morbid obesity who underwent a LRYGB at our institution between January 2002 and July 2007. All patients who developed symptoms compatible with stricture of the gastrojejunostomy were referred to upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and underwent endoscopic balloon dilation. Results: One hundred and five out of the 1,330 patients (7.8%) developed an anastomotic stricture. The mean time to diagnosis was 3 months after the surgery. The mean diameter of the stricture was 5 mm. Sixty out of the 105 patients required only one dilation (57%), 29 required two dilations (27,6%), 13 required three dilations, and 3 patients underwent a fourth dilation. Clinical success was achieved in 100% of the cases, with an average of 1.6 dilations. The statistical analysis showed that only the time from surgery to stricture formation ( p = 0.007) and the diameter achieved at the first dilation ( p = 0.015) had statistical significance as predictors of the need of one or more dilations. Conclusions: Endoscopic balloon dilation is a safe and effective method. Most of the patients are successfully managed with one or two dilations. The longer time from surgery to the appearance of symptoms ant the largest diameter achieved at the first dilation are the only predicting factors of success with only one dilation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) is a standard procedure for the removal of bile duct stones. However, additional EST may increase the risk of bleeding and perforation in patients with prior EST. Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation (EPLBD) can be an alternative method for removing recurrent common bile duct stones with lower risk of bleeding and perforation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the therapeutic outcomes and complications of EPLBD in patients with recurrent common duct stones who underwent EST previously. Methods: Between January 2006 and August 2009, 70 patients with recurrent bile duct stones who had a history of EST were studied retrospectively. All patients underwent EPLBD without additional EST to enlarge the ampullary orifice. The size of the balloon for EPLBD was 12-18 mm and the duration of the balloon dilatation was 30-60 s. Results: Of the 70 patients, there were 24 patients (34.3%) with periampullary diverticula, 18 patients (25.7%) with hypertension, 4 patients (5.7%) with ischemic heart diseases, 2 patients (2.9%) with liver cirrhosis, and 1 patient (1.4%) with chronic kidney disease. Mean diameter of the stones was 12.5 ± 5.5 mm. Complete clearance of the duct was achieved in all patients and mechanical lithotripsy was needed in 1 patient (1.4%). Sixty-eight cases (97.1%) required only 1 session of ERCP to achieve complete ductal clearance. Mild pancreatitis occurred in 1 patient (2.3%), but there was no bleeding or perforation. Conclusion: EPLBD is an effective and safe method for the treatment of recurrent common duct stones in patients with prior EST. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedure (RYGBP) is an effective treatment for morbid obesity. Anastomotic strictures are a common complication after RYGBP. This study examines the frequency of post-RYGBP gastrojejunal strictures (GJS), methods of evaluation, and the outcome of endoscopic intervention. Medical records of patients who had RYGBP for morbid obesity at our institution during four consecutive years were reviewed for patient demographics, medical comorbidities, surgical technique, and outcomes. Radiographic and endoscopic findings of those patients suspected to have GJS were noted. The impact of patient-related variables and surgical technique on risk of GJS, time to diagnosis of GJS, and treatment outcomes for GJS was determined. Of 888 patients, 503 had open RYGBP (57%) and 385 laparoscopic RYGBP (43%). Ninety-four patients (10.6%) underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) for possible GJS and 58 (6.5%) were found to have anastomotic stricture. Laparoscopic RYGBP was associated with increased incidence of GJS (43/385, 11.1%) compared with open RYGBP (15/503 or 2.9%, P = 0.0003). A total of 125 dilations were performed with an average of 2.2 dilations per patient. None of the strictures needed surgical revision. There were four perforations (3.2%) related to EGD. Mean time to diagnosis of GJS was 66.2 days. Eighty-seven of 94 patients underwent radiologic upper gastrointestinal (UGI) evaluation prior to EGD. UGI evaluation demonstrated a positive predictive value (PPV) of only 66% [95% confidence interval (CI) 52-77], and negative predictive value (NPV) of 83% (95% CI 65-93). Laparoscopic GBP is associated with increased risk of GJS. Endoscopic dilation of GJS is an effective treatment with minimal risk. Radiographic studies appear to have poor specificity for diagnosis of GJS and have a low positive predictive value. EGD should be performed in all suspected cases of GJS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) occasionally induce small-bowel injury. However, the clinical features have only been partially clarified. The aim of this study was to clarify the clinical features of the disease and evaluate the effectiveness of endoscopic balloon dilation therapy for diaphragm disease, using double-balloon endoscopy (DBE). This is a retrospective case study using our DBE database. Our inclusion criteria required patients to meet all the following criteria: (1) history of NSAID use; (2) endoscopic findings of erosion and/or ulcer and/or typical diaphragm-like strictures; (3) improvement in clinical findings (signs and symptoms) and/or endoscopic findings by cessation of NSAIDs, except for diaphragm disease; and (4) exclusion of other causes (e.g., malignant tumor, inflammatory bowel disease, and infectious disease). The clinical records of patients were investigated. Eighteen patients were included. Sixteen patients showed ulcerative lesions, and the remaining 2 patients showed diaphragm diseases. For localized lesions, 12 patients evidenced lesions in the ileum, 5 patients had lesions in the duodenum and/or jejunum, and 1 had lesions in both intestines. The ulcerative lesions were multiple with various morphologies that were located unrelated to mesenteric or antimesenteric sides. The endoscopic balloon dilations were performed safely, and all patients improved with regard to their symptoms. Symptomatic NSAID-induced small-bowel injuries exhibit a variety of patterns of ulcerative lesions as observed in the ileum in many cases. The endoscopic balloon dilation appears to be a safe and effective treatment for diaphragm disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A 14-year-old girl was admitted to our hospital for treatment of abdominal pain after an attempt to commit suicide by swallowing a caustic soda solution. Severe esophageal stricture following corrosive esophagitis occurred 2 weeks after admission. First, we tried to dilate the stenotic esophagus by using an esophageal bougie, but it was not effective and was also painful, and the treatment was stopped. Next, we tried endoscopic balloon dilation. This procedure was less painful and more effective for dilating the stenotic esophagus than was the bougie. At first, we used a pneumatic balloon and injected a steroid locally under the mucosal layer after dilation. The same procedure was continued in the outpatient clinic, but each interval of the procedures, about 3 weeks, was not changed for about 1 year. After 1 year of consecutive trials of frequent dilatation using a pneumatic balloon, the type of balloon was changed to a hydrostatic type. Three months after changing the type of balloon, treatment with tranilast, which was expected to be effective for prevention of restenosis, was started instead of steroid injection to the stenotic portion. After starting tranilast treatment, the interval of dilation became longer and the stricture itself gradually became dilated. Twenty-one months later, the interval of dilation was 3–4 months and oral intake had improved greatly. We therefore concluded that frequent endoscopic balloon dilation is effective for dilating stenosis after corrosive esophagitis. In addition, this case suggests that treatment with tranilast could be effective for preventing esophageal restenosis after balloon dilation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]