Search

Whether surgical revascularization can prevent recurrent hemorrhage in hemorrhagic moyamoya disease (HMD) patients remains a matter of debate. This study mainly aims at the comparison of treatment effect between surgical revascularization and conservative treatment of adult HMD patients. We retrospectively enrolled 322 adult HMD patients, including 133 in revascularization group and 189 in conservative group. The revascularization group included patients who underwent combined (n = 97) or indirect revascularization alone (n = 36). Ninety-two and forty-one patients underwent unilateral and bilateral revascularization respectively. The modified Rankin scale (mRS) was used to assess the functional status. The comparison was made based on initial treatment paradigm among two categories: (1) revascularization vs. conservative, (2) unilateral vs. bilateral revascularization. The rebleeding rate was significantly lower in revascularization group than that in conservative group (14.3% vs. 27.0%, P = 0.007). As for the functional outcomes, the average mRS was significantly better in revascularization group (1.7 ± 1.5) than that in conservative group (2.8 ± 1.9) (P < 0.001). The death rate in revascularization group was 8.3% (11/133), comparing to 20.1% (38/189) in conservative group (P = 0.004). While comparing between unilateral and bilateral revascularization within the revascularization group, the result demonstrated lower annual rebleeding rate in bilateral group (0.5%/side-year) than that in unilateral group (3.3%/side-year) (P = 0.001). This study proved the better treatment efficacy of surgical revascularization than that of conservative treatment in HMD patients, regarding both in rebleeding rate and mortality rate. Furthermore, bilateral revascularization seems more effective in preventing rebleeding than unilateral revascularization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The effects of superficial temporal artery to middle cerebral artery (STA-MCA) double bypass on recurrent hemorrhage in the operated hemisphere in hemorrhagic moyamoya disease (HMD) have not been clearly demonstrated. This study evaluated the effectiveness of STA-MCA double bypass in the prevention of further hemorrhagic or ischemic events in the operated hemispheric sides in comparison to the conservatively treated non-operated sides. We retrospectively analyzed 52 hemispheres of 36 patients with adult-onset HMD treated with STA-MCA double bypass. Twenty and 16 patients underwent unilateral (unilateral group) and bilateral (bilateral group) surgery, respectively. In addition, the perioperative and long-term outcomes of the 52 operated sides and 20 non-operated sides in the unilateral group were compared. All bypass surgeries were successful, but 21% of the operated sides showed hyperperfusion as estimated by our methods. Perioperative mortality and morbidity rate were 0% and 5.6%, respectively. Concerning long-term follow-up, the annual rebleeding rate (ARR) in the unilateral and bilateral group was 2.7% and 2.6%/person-year, respectively (p = 0.256). The ARR in the operated and non-operated sides was 1.1% and 1.8%/side-year, respectively (p = 0.163). Two of 20 non-operated sides suffered from ischemic infarction during the follow-up period, while none of the 52 operated sides experienced ischemic events (p < 0.05). Although the long-term rebleeding rate in the operated hemisphere tended to be lower after STA-MCA double bypass compared with that in the non-operated hemisphere, the difference was not statistically significant. In conclusion, while STA-MCA double bypass could not clearly prevent rebleeding, it can prevent further ischemic attacks in patients with HMD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]