Search

Before patients begin out-of-bed exercises following internal fixation surgery for acetabular fractures, turning over in bed serves as a crucial intervention to mitigate complications associated with prolonged bed rest. However, data on the safety of this maneuver post-surgery are limited, and the biomechanical evidence remains unclear. This study aims to introduce a novel loading protocol designed to preliminarily simulate the action of turning over in bed and to compare the biomechanical properties of two fixation methods for acetabular fractures under this new protocol. A RNJ-500 microcomputer-controlled electronic torsion tester was utilized to simulate the action of turning over in bed and to conduct a dynamic torsion loading test. Initially, the torque values and torsional stiffness of six intact pelvis specimens (Group A) were measured. A double-column acetabular fracture model was then created and stabilized using two different fixation methods: the Dynamic Anterior Plate-Screw System for the Quadrilateral plate (DAPSQ, Group B) and the traditional anterior reconstruction titanium plate plus a 1/3 tubular buttress plate (Group C). All specimens underwent cyclic torsion loading ranging from 2° to 8°. The medial displacement and strain values of the quadrilateral plate were recorded and analyzed. As the torsion angles increased from 2° to 8°, Groups A and B exhibited significantly higher torque values compared to Group C (all P < 0.05). Group C demonstrated notably lower torsional stiffness (1.51 ± 0.20) relative to Group A (2.33 ± 0.25, P < 0.05) and Group B (2.21 ± 0.29, P < 0.05). Additionally, the medial displacement of the quadrilateral plate was significantly reduced in Group B compared to Group C at all measured time points (P < 0.05). And Group C exhibited significantly higher maximum tensile and compressive strain than Group B (all P < 0.05). The DAPSQ plate with quadrilateral screws provides superior anti-rotational stability in a double-column acetabular fracture model under the newly established torsion loading protocol. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: This study aimed to explore the effect of displaced dorsal rim fragments under defined size threshold on the clinical outcome. Materials and methods: Forty patients with an acute distal radius fracture accompanied by a dorsal rim fragment comprising less than 10% of the radiocarpal articular surface were included in the study. The size of the dorsal rim fragment was measured by axial CT scans and three-dimensional (3D) CT scans, and the correlation between these two methods was analyzed to evaluate the reliability of axial CT scan measurements. Based on the displacement (> 2 mm) of dorsal rim fragments measured by sagittal CT scans, the patients were divided into two groups, namely the displaced group (17 patients) and the control group (23 patients). The radiographic parameters and wrist function at final follow-up were compared between the two groups. Results: Mean radiocarpal joint involvement of the included dorsal rim fragment was 8.6%±1.0% (range, 5.7–9.9%) assessed by axial CT scans. There was a strong correlation in the radiocarpal articular involvement of the dorsal rim fragment between axial CT scans and 3D CT models (correlation coefficient r = 0.819). Mean displacement of the dorsal rim fragment was 2.2 (2.1, 2.5) mm (range, 2.0–3.2) in the displaced group and 0.9 (0, 1.5) mm (range, 0–1.9) in the control group. There were no significant differences in any radiographic parameter and wrist function between the two groups. Conclusions: For dorsal rim fragments comprising less than 10% of the radiocarpal articular surface in distal radius fracture, mild displacement does not significantly affect the recovery of wrist function. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study was aimed to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients with intercondylar fractures of the humerus treated with orthogonal and parallel plating methods via precontoured plates. This was a retrospective comparative study conducted on 50 adult patients with intercondylar humerus fractures that were surgically treated over an eleven-year period. The patients were divided into two groups: Group A underwent internal fixation via parallel plating, whereas Group B received orthogonal plating. Clinical outcomes were evaluated via the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), and the radiographic assessments included time to consolidation, pseudoarthrosis, malunion and hardware removal. Both groups presented similar demographic and preoperative characteristics. The functional outcomes assessed by the MEPS were not significantly different between the groups. Radiographically, comparable healing times and rates of complications, including pseudoarthrosis, malunion and hardware removal, were observed. The study findings suggest that both orthogonal and parallel plating methods yield comparable clinical and radiographic outcomes in the treatment of intercondylar humerus fractures. These results underscore the effectiveness of both techniques and emphasize the importance of further research to elucidate the optimal plating method for specific fracture patterns. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Calcaneal body fractures are often associated with varying degrees of shortening deformities. Restoring calcaneal length is crucial for the functional prognosis of the foot. Through finite element analysis, this study compared the biomechanical effects of multiple fixation schemes for calcaneal fractures. We delineated and assembled the finite element model of the Sanders type II calcaneal fracture and four internal fixation simulations (namely distraction screw, lag screw, frame locking plate, and T-shaped locking plate). Different axial forces (350, 700, and 1400 N) were then applied to simulate various postures. We then compared the inner and outer shortening distances (D1 and D2, respectively), equivalent von Mises stress, and maximum von Mises stress of the calcaneus. In the individual model, with an increase in the pressure, D1, D2, and the maximum von Mises stress gradually increased. At 1400 N, D1 and D2 for the internal fixation schemes were as follows: distraction screw (0.03 mm, 0.1 mm) < T-shaped locking plate (0.45 mm, 0.26 mm) < frame locking plate (0.50 mm, 0.26 mm) < lag screw (0.66 mm, 0.64 mm). The maximum von Mises stress values for the internal fixation methods were as follows: lag screw (491.0 MPa) < distraction screw (663.1 MPa) < frame locking plate (772.7 MPa) < T-shaped locking plate (931.8 MPa). In patients with calcaneal body fractures, the distraction screw is a potential therapeutic option for resisting calcaneal shortening. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Screw fixation of acetabular column fractures is a well-established alternative option to plate fixation providing comparable biomechanical strength and requiring less surgical exposure. For displaced acetabular fractures involving both columns open reduction and plate fixation of one column in combination with a column-crossing screw fixation of the opposite column via a single approach is a viable treatment option. Preoperative planning of posterior column screws (PCS) via an anterior approach is mandatory to assess the eligibility of the fracture for this technique and to plan the entry point and the screw trajectory. The intraoperative application requires fluoroscopic guidance using several views. A single view showing an extraarticular screw position is adequate to rule out hip joint penetration. The fluoroscopic assessment of cortical perforation of the posterior column requires several oblique views such as lateral oblique views, obturator oblique views and axial views of the posterior column or alternatively intraoperative CT scans. The application of PCS via an anterior approach is a technically demanding procedure, that allows for a relevant reduction of approach-related morbidity, surgical time and blood loss by using a single approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The incidence of geriatric acetabular fractures has shown a sharp increase in the last decades. The majority of patients are male, which is different to other osteoporotic fractures. The typical pathomechanism generally differs from acetabular fractures in young patients regarding both the direction and the amount of force transmission to the acetabulum via the femoral head. Geriatric fractures very frequently involve anterior structures of the acetabulum, while the posterior wall is less frequently involved. The anterior column and posterior hemitransverse (ACPHT) fracture is the most common fracture type. Superomedial dome impactions (gull sign) are a frequent feature in geriatric acetabular fractures as well. Treatment options include nonoperative treatment, internal fixation and arthoplasty. Nonoperative treatment includes rapid mobilisation and full weighbearing under analgesia and is advisable in non- or minimally displaced fractures without subluxation of the hip joint and without positive gull sign. Open reduction and internal fixation of geriatric acetabular fractures leads to good or excellent results, if anatomic reduction is achieved intraoperatively and loss of reduction does not occur postoperatively. Primary arthroplasty of geriatric acetabular fractures is a treatment option, which does not require anatomic reduction, allows for immediate postoperative full weightbearing and obviates several complications, which are associated with internal fixation. The major issue is the fixation of the acetabular cup in the fractured bone. Primary cups, reinforcement rings or a combination of arthroplasty and internal fixation may be applied depending on the acetabular fracture type. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This cohort study aimed to describe the functional outcomes, complications, and mortality of patients over 65 with acute distal femur fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) or distal femoral replacement (DFR). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed all patients older than 65, operated consecutively for a distal femur fracture treated with ORIF or DFR. We included 75 patients (9 33A, 5 33B, and 61 33C AO/OTA fractures), 55 treated with ORIF, and 20 with DFR. We used Parker's mobility index (PMI) to assess functional outcomes at 1, 3, and 12 months and study closure. We analyzed complications, reoperations, and mortality at 30 days, one year, and at the end of the study. Results: The PMI was significantly higher in the DFR group at months 1 (p = 0.023) and 3 (p = 0.032). We found no significant differences between cohorts at one year and the end of follow-up. Postoperative complications were significantly more frequent in the ORIF group (38.10% vs. 10%, p = 0.022). Reoperations were similar in both cohorts (p = 0.98). Mortality at one month was 4% and 20% at one year, and at the end of follow-up, there were no significant differences between groups. Conclusion: The outcomes of this study suggest that DFR offers a faster functional recovery with lower complication rates than those treated with ORIF. Additionally, both options have similar reoperation and mortality rates. Appropriately designed studies are needed to define the best treatment strategy for this type of patient. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: This study aims to assess differences in clinical and surgical outcomes associated with the surgical treatment of midshaft clavicle fractures of different complexities based on fragment number. Additionally, the investigation seeks to present the outcomes of a series of patients who underwent surgery at our institution. Materials and methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the medical records of patients aged over 18 who underwent midshaft clavicle fracture surgery at our center from November 2009 to May 2021. Patients were categorized based on the number of fracture fragments into groups of two, three, or more than three fragments. Consolidation, implant removal, complications, surgical duration, and functional outcomes (assessed through VAS, ASES, and Constant–Murley scale) were evaluated for each specific group and for the overall cohort. Results: In total, 260 patients were analyzed. There were no significant differences in any of the parameters between the three groups except for surgical time, which was shorter in simple fractures than in those with more than three fragments (68.2 min vs. 75.3 min; p = 0.01). Pseudoarthrosis rate was 2.69%, implant removal rate was 9.61%, and 4.23% of patients presented with complications other than the previous ones. Functional results were excellent, with averages of 97.3 (72.7–100) for the ASES score, 97.5 (75–100) for the Constant score, and 0.6 (0–8) on the VAS. Conclusion: According to our results, there were no differences in postoperative results between simple and multifragmentary midshaft clavicle fractures. Patients across all groups reported satisfactory results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the long-term outcomes of patients with a femoral neck fracture (FNF), treated with the Dynamic Locking Blade Plate (DLBP). Methods: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of a multicentre cohort of patients with FNFs was conducted, regarding the long-term incidence of revision surgery after DLBP. Implant failure was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis. Secondary outcomes were the indication for revision surgery, complications, time to revision surgery, rate of elective removal of the implant, potential predictors for revision surgery and mortality. Results: Median follow-up of 389 included patients was 98 months; 20.6% underwent revision surgery; 28.8% after treatment of a displaced FNF (dFNF) and 10.0% with a undisplaced FNF (uFNF). 5.7% (n = 22) of the patients had operation related complications and 32.9% (n = 128) deceased during follow-up. Median time to revision surgery was 13 (dFNF) and 18 months (uFNF). 15.7% of the DLBPs were electively removed. In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, female gender (hazard ratio 2.1, 95% CI 1.2–3.7) and a TAD > 25 mm (hazard ratio 2.9, 95% CI 1.7-5) were significant predictors for revision surgery in patients with dFNF. Conclusion: This study is the first long-term follow-up study on the outcome of the DLBP. The DLBP demonstrated positive long-term results in the treatment of FNF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: In displaced pediatric proximal humerus fractures (PHF), surgical treatment ranges from closed to open procedures. Soft tissue interposition can impede closed reduction, making open techniques necessary. While K-wire fixation and elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) lead to good results, plate fixation could be an alternative in patients with limited growth potential and highly unstable or insufficiently retained fractures. Only few studies with low sample sizes have assessed plate fixation, yet. In this study, the outcome of pediatric PHFs treated with plate fixation was evaluated. Materials and methods: We present a retrospective case series of 18 patients with open growth plates and unilateral, displaced PHFs, treated with plate fixation. The mean age at trauma was 12.1 years (± 2.4), the mean follow-up was 6.52 years (± 4.37). A mean fracture angulation of 32.3° (± 10.89°) was seen. Postoperative assessments included range of motion, clinical scores [Simple Shoulder Test (SST), Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Shoulder Score, Pediatric/Adolescent Shoulder Score (PASS), Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Score], radiological parameters and subjective satisfaction. Results: All patients showed excellent results in SST (99.4% ± 0.02), SSV (98.3% ± 0.04), ASES-score (100% ± 0) and PASS (0.99 ± 0.01). In the DASH-score, 17 patients had excellent results, one patient showed a good outcome. Fracture healing occurred in all patients without complications. Eight patients complained about bothering scars. Age, gender and fracture morphology did not affect the outcome. Revision surgery after secondary fracture dislocation did not show a worsened outcome compared to primary plate fixation. Physeal growth plate bridging implants did not worsen the outcome. The timing of implant removal within the first 6 months postoperatively did not affect long-term function. Conclusion: Plate fixation is a safe option in pediatric patients with limited growth potential and highly displaced PHFs. Plate fixation led to a good to excellent functional outcome, regardless of fracture morphology and implant positioning. A higher invasiveness and the need for implant removal must be considered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The dynamic hip screw (DHS) and cannulated compression screws (CCS) have been the two implants most frequently employed for the fixation of femoral neck fractures. The objective of this study is to compare clinical and radiographic outcomes between patients treated with the FNS and those treated with CCS. Material and methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of a consecutive series of femoral neck fractures treated with FNS or CCS between May 2019 and June 2022. The study included 144 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Collected data encompassed age, sex, Garden fracture classification, Pauwels classification, duration of surgery, length of hospital stays, Harris Hip Score (HHS), complications, and injured side. Results: The FNS group comprised 70 patients, while the CCS group consisted of 74 patients. The operation time was 43.6 ± 12.09 min for the FNS group and 56.47 ± 22.42 min for the CCS group. At the end of the follow-up, the mean HHS was 87.07 ± 11.77 for the FNS group and 76.20 ± 13.64 for the CCS group. The mean reduction in hemoglobin levels from pre- to post-surgery was 1.05 mg/dl in the FNS group and 0.87 mg/dl in the CCS group. The reintervention rate was 8.1% for the CCS group and 2.85% for the FNS group. Conclusion: The FNS does not demonstrate superiority over CCS regarding femoral neck shortening, complication rate, and reduction in hemoglobin levels. However, FNS does appear superior to CCS in terms HHS, operation time, and reoperation rate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: No comprehensive treatise on the early history of fractures of posterior malleolus (PM) has yet been published, and many substantial discoveries have fallen into oblivion—particularly if not having been published in English originally. Materials and methods: Literature search was performed in original publications and historical sources. Results: Early history of PM fractures from their first description up to the beginnings of their operative treatment may be divided into three basic periods, covering the era between 1828 and 1940. In the pre-radiological period (1828–1895), description of PM injuries was based merely on the autopsy findings in deceased patients. The first mentions of this injury were published by the British authors. In the radiologic period (1899–1916), the x-ray examination started a revolution also in diagnostics of ankle fractures, with the first radiographs performed as early as in 1899. Radiographic examination had subsequently become an integral part of the diagnostics of these injuries and initiated a number of significant studies of PM fractures. The first detailed mention of a PM injury may be found in the French and German literature. The period of early operative treatment (1918–1940), i.e., open reduction and internal fixation of PM, was started by the younger post-WWI generation, primarily the French surgeons, represented by Gaston Picot. His operative technique and the first six cases treated operatively between 1918 and 1921 were described in 1921 by Edouard Huc. Picot himself published his technique in great detail in 1923. Conclusion: The early history of diagnostics and treatment of PM fractures witnesses the remarkable body of knowledge gathered about that topic by numerous visionary surgeons predominantly French and German surgeons immediately before and after World War I. They substantially contributed to the radiological examination and operative treatment of this injury. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Determine if anterior internal versus supra-acetabular external fixation of unstable pelvic fractures is associated with care needs or discharge. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed at two tertiary trauma referral centers. Adults with unstable pelvis fractures (AO/OTA 61B/61C) who received operative fixation of the anterior and posterior pelvic ring by two orthopedic trauma surgeons from October 2020 to November 2022 were included. The primary outcome was discharge destination. Secondary outcomes included intensive care unit (ICU) or ventilator days, length of stay, and hospital charges. Results: Eighty-three eligible patients were 38.6% female, with a mean age of 47.2 ± 20.3 years and BMI 28.1 ± 6.4 kg/m2. Fifty-nine patients (71.1%) received anterior pelvis internal fixation and 24 (28.9%) received external fixation. External fixation was associated with weight-bearing restrictions (91.7% versus 49.2%, p = 0.01). No differences in demographic, functional status, insurance type, fracture classification, or injury severity measures were observed by treatment. Internal versus external anterior pelvic fixation was not associated with discharge to home (49.2% versus 29.2%, p = 0.10), median ICU days (3.0 [interquartile range (IQR) 7.8 versus 5.5 [IQR 4.3], p = 0.14, ventilator days (0 [IQR 6.0] versus 0 [IQR 2.8], p = 0.51), length of stay (13.0 [IQR 13.0] versus 17.5 (IQR 20.5), p = 0.38), or total hospital charges (US dollars 180,311 [IQR 219,061.75] versus 243,622 [IQR 187,111], p = 0.14). Conclusions: Anterior internal versus supra-acetabular external fixation of unstable pelvis fractures was not significantly associated with discharge destination, critical care, hospital length of stay, or hospital charges. This sample may be underpowered to detect differences between groups. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Surgical treatment for atlantoaxial instability in pediatric patients is challenging. We report our experience with posterior intra-articular distraction technique in treating this disorder. Methods: This is a retrospective descriptive study which included 15 patients of atlantoaxial instability whose age was less than 16 years at the time of clinical presentation. All patients underwent anterior soft tissue released through a posterior-only approach, followed by intra-facet cage implantation, cantilever correction, and instrumentation. Clinical results were measured using the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scale and radiographic measurements including the atlantodental interval (ADI), posterior atlantodental interval (pADI), the distance of odontoid tip above Chamberlain's line, clivuscanal angle (CCA), and triangular area (TA) of craniovertebral junction. Results: The follow-up period ranged from 18 to 72 months, with an average of 41.2 ± 15.2 months. The JOA score increased from 13.6 ± 2.3 to 16.6 ± 0.8. ADI decreased from 4.31 ± 2.37 to 1.85 ± 1.09 mm, and TA decreased from 261.96 ± 107.99 to 197.12 ± 72.37 mm2. pADI increased from 12.89 ± 3.52 to 18.25 ± 3.89 mm, and CCA improved from 132.19 ± 16.34 to 144.35 ± 13.91°. All changes in measurements showed statistically significant. There were no evidence of surgery-related complications or iatrogenic secondary cervical deformity during follow-up. Radiological evaluation showed satisfactory corrections and bony fusions of C1–2 facet joint in all cases. Conclusion: Posterior intra-articular distraction followed by cage implantation and cantilever correction can be one of the safe and effective ways to solve atlantoaxial instability in pediatric patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Die Unfallchirurgie is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background: Delayed operative fixation of acetabular fractures remains a major problem in many parts of the world. No previous studies have reported the effect of fixation delay on health-related quality of life (HRQOL). We aimed to investigate the effect of delayed operative fixation of acetabular fractures on health-related quality of life, EuroQol-5 Dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D), and other related outcomes. Methods: We retrospectively analysed 117 patients who underwent open reduction internal fixation for displaced acetabular fractures between 2014 and 2021. Patients were divided into groups based on the admission-to-surgery time (interval between injury and definitive surgery): 1–14, 15–21, and >21 days. Patients were analysed for associations between admission-to-surgery time and postoperative outcomes, including operative time, estimated blood loss, blood transfusion, postoperative complication, and quality of reduction. Eighty-five patients with a mean follow-up time of 3.94 ± 1.84 years were analysed for the association between admission-to-surgery time and conversion to total hip arthroplasty, the Modified Merle d'Aubigné and Postel score, EQ-5D score, ability to sit cross-legged, and ability to sit squat. Multivariable linear regression was used for continuous outcomes and logistic regression for categorical outcomes associated with delayed operative fixation. Results: An admission-to-surgery time > 14 days was associated with significantly higher blood loss [785 mL (236–1335), p = 0.006]. For associated fractures, an admission-to-surgery time > 21 days increased the risk of poor reduction [odds ratio (OR), 5.21 (1.42–19.11), p = 0.013]. Further, admission-to-surgery time > 21 days was associated with poor Modified Merle d'Aubigné and Postel scores [OR, 8.46 (1.48–48.29), p = 0.016], EQ-5D pain domain [OR, 3.55 (1.15–11), p = 0.028], and EQ-5D usual activity domain [OR, 4.24 (1.28–14), p = 0.018]. Conclusion: Delayed operative fixation of acetabular fractures after 21 days affected the functional outcomes and HRQOL, independent of the reduction status. Surgical interventions and patient referrals should occur at the earliest and within 21 days from the time of injury. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: German-speaking surgeons have left a deep imprint on the history of diagnostics and treatment of proximal femur fractures. Some of the studies published in German have fell into oblivion, others are cited until today, although sometimes quite inaccurately. The cause of such inaccuracies are citations from secondary sources due to unavailability of the original or inability to read it because of a language barrier. In the current literature, globally predominated by English articles, the "German history" of treatment of proximal femur fractures remains undervalued. The aim of the present article is to point out its contribution. Materials and methods: Literature search was performed in original publications and historical sources. Results: The German-speaking surgeons have considerably contributed to the development of the treatment of proximal femur fractures. The analyzed period between 1847 and 1970 may be divided into three basic periods. In the first period (1847–1896), the German-speaking surgeons (Langenbeck, Trendelenburg, König, Heine, Dolinger) were the first worldwide to start treating the fractures of proximal femur operatively. In the second period (1897–1935), mainly in the 1930s, the initiative in Europe was taken over by surgeons publishing studies in France and in Belgium. Overseas, American surgeons were coming to the forefront. In Germany, only Pauwels developed the first biomechanical classification of femoral neck fractures. In the third period (1936–1970), mainly in the 1940s and 1950s, implants were designed (Pohl, Künstcher), based on close collaboration between German engineers and surgeons, that served as a model for a dynamic hip screw and a proximal femoral nail, which are currently the implants of choice in the treatment of trochanteric fractures. Conclusion: The historical contribution of German-speaking surgeons to understanding the issue of proximal femur fractures and their operative treatment is far more significant than presented in the historical studies published in English. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Die Unfallchirurgie is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

This study aimed to compare the properties and safety of self-designed plates in type II traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis with those of traditional devices via finite element (FE) analysis. We constructed a hangman's fracture FE model from the occipital bone (C0) level to the C3 level. Then, FE models were constructed for the following four fixation systems: an anterior cervical L-shaped plate with four vertebral screws (4-ACLP), or six screws (6-ACLP), an anterior cervical orion plate (ACOP), and a posterior fixation system. A preloaded compressive force of 50 N and a moment of 1.5 N·m were applied to each model under six working conditions. The mobility of the C2/3 segment decreased significantly in four fixation models. In the Mises stress cloud diagram, 4-ACLP showed a better stress distribution in both the bone graft and fixation system than 6-ACLP and ACOP. The resultant force of 4-ACLP was lower but higher than ACOP in axial force. Additionally, the cage in the 4-ACLP configuration experienced the highest stress in the six working conditions. Hence, this novel self-designed plate has the potential to mitigate the operational difficulties, provide sufficient stability, reduce the risk of plate or screw fractures, and improve bone fusion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Intertrochanteric fractures can be classified as stable (AO-OTA 31-A1) or unstable (AO-OTA 31-A2/3). For A3 fractures there is no recommended treatment, often fixed with either an intramedullary nail (IMN) or a dynamic hip screw and trochanteric stabilisation plate (DHS/TSP). This study retrospectively reviews peri-operative outcomes of patients treated with either fixator. Methods: Pre-operative demographics, operative information and patient outcome data from 213 patients who suffered intertrochanteric fractures and were treated with either DHS/TSP or IMN at a major trauma centre from 01/2015 to 01/2022 was collected. Unpaired T tests were performed to assess levels of significance between peri-operative outcomes. Results: The mean age for DHS/TSP-treated patients was 2.63 years greater than IMN-treated (P = 0.039). There were no other significant differences in pre-operative characteristics. We found a significantly shorter mean operative time in the DHS/TSP group (88.05 min, 95% CI: 82.1–94.0) compared to IMN counterparts (100.8 min, 95% CI: 92.7–109.0, P = 0.012), but no statistically significant difference in length of hospital stay or patient mortality, blood transfusion, re-operation or complication rates. When A3 fractures were analysed, a statistically significant greater proportion of IMN patients required blood transfusions (DHS/TSP: 35.90%, IMN: 65.00%, P = 0.0093). All other factors were found to have no significant differences. Conclusion: This study provides evidence to support the national guidelines regarding A1 fractures and suggests that DHS/TSP is a valid alternative to the IMN in A3 intertrochanteric fractures, with reduced blood loss. With the flexibility to add the TSP intraoperatively to prevent femoral head medialisation, and cheaper implant costs, the DHS/TSP may become the preferred method of internal fixation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The sustentaculum tali is displaced in almost half of calcaneal fractures and during surgical fixation represents one of the main reference points upon which the other bone has to be reduced. The purpose of this study was to investigate which subtalar joint fracture pattern is more frequently associated with sustentaculum tali involvement. Furthermore, correlation between postoperative clinical outcome and sustentaculum tali integrity was performed. Material and methods: Patients with isolated calcaneal fractures were analyzed. Sanders-type fracture and involvement of both sustentaculum tali and calcaneocuboid joint were detected on computed tomography imaging; postoperative AOFAS scores were analyzed according to sustentacular involvement. Results: Fifty calcaneus fractures in 47 patients were included in the final analysis. The sustentaculum tali was fractured in 18 cases (36.0%), thus contradicting its supposed constant position. Sanders type 3 and 4 fractures were more frequently associated with fractured sustentaculum than type 2 (p = 0.012). Sanders type 4 fractures were associated with displaced sustentacular fragment significantly more than type 2 and 3 (p = 0.043). Patients with intact sustentaculum tali reported significantly higher (p < 0.001) mean AOFAS scores than the uninjured group (84.4 ± 9.1 and 74.3 ± 9.5, respectively). Conclusion: Sanders type 3 and 4 fractures were more frequently associated with sustentaculum tali and/or calcaneocuboid joint involvement than simpler fractures. Injury of sustentaculum tali was related to significant worse postoperative clinical outcomes, underlying the relevance of this fragment on clinical course. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Gustilo IIIB open tibial fractures are associated with significant risks of complications particularly nonunion and fracture-related infections (FRI) due to the severity of the injuries. The commonly adopted viewpoint is that a Gustilo IIIB open tibial fracture is a relative contraindication for internal fixation. However, this study aims to assess the veracity of this viewpoint. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of the definitive fixation technique on fracture nonunion and FRI rates in Gustilo IIIB open tibial fractures. In this study, we compared the rates of nonunion and FRI rates in grade IIIB open tibial fractures managed definitively with either mono-lateral external fixation or internal fixation. Methods: The study was a multicenter retrospective comparative study undertaken in seven Nigerian tertiary hospitals. Following ethical approval, medical records of patients diagnosed with Gustilo IIIB open tibial fractures (between 2019 and 2021) were retrieved, patients who had a minimum of nine months of follow-up period and were found eligible had their relevant data entered into an online data collection form. Data obtained was analysed with SPSS version 23, and chi-square test was used to determine the statistical significance of differences observed between the two groups with regard to nonunion and FRI rates. P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: Out of a total of 47 eligible patients, 25 patients were managed definitively with mono-lateral external fixation whilst 22 patients were managed with internal fixation. Five of the 25 patients (20%) managed with external fixation had nonunion whilst two cases of nonunion were recorded amongst the 22 patients (9.1%) treated with internal fixation. The difference between the two techniques with regard to nonunion rates was not statistically significant (P = 0.295). 12 out of 25 patients (48%) in the external fixation group had FRIs whilst 6 out of 22 patients (27.3%) in the internal fixation group had FRIs. The rates of FRIs of the two groups were not significantly different (P = 0.145). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that mono-lateral external fixation and internal fixation do not differ significantly with respect to rates of nonunion and fracture-related infections in Gustilo IIIB open tibial fractures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Osteonecrosis of the humeral head (ONHH) is a severe complication after the internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures (IFPHF). The risk factors remain controversial though many studies have reported. In this research, meta-analysis was used to evaluate which surgeon-level factors can be modified to lower the risk and we hope to provide evidence-based support for preventing ONHH. Methods: Literature was retrieved from PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus for eligible studies published up to January 2023. The pooled odds ratios (ORs) were calculated with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to evaluate. STATA 15.1 software was applied for data synthesis, sensitivity synthesis, and publication bias. Results: 45 articles were published between 2000 and 2022, and 2482 patients were finally included. All articles were observational research, with 7 case–control studies and 38 cohort studies, and the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) score ranged from 7 to 9. The pooled results suggested that age (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.14–0.74, P = 0.01), reduction quality (OR 0.08, 95% CI 0.01–0.44, P = 0.00), fracture type (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.25–0.78, P = 0.01), surgical approach (OR: 4.06, 95% CI 1.21–13.61, P = 0.02) and fixation implant (OR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.34–1.33, P = 0.02) were risk factors for ONHH after IFPHF. According to sensitivity analysis, Begg (P = 0.42) and Egger (P = 0.68) tests, the results were stable and exhibited no publication bias. Conclusions: The study showed that age, reduction quality, fracture type, surgical approach and fixation implant were risk factors for ONHH after IFPHF, while gender, varus or valgus, timely operation, injured side, and the existence of medial support have little influence on ONHH, as they could not be considered risk factors and still need further investigations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients undergoing open reduction and internal fixation (OR/IF) using a plate or patients undergoing an arthroscopic suture anchor fixation for the greater tuberosity (GT) fracture of the proximal humerus. The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients undergoing OR/IF or an arthroscopic suture anchor fixation for the GT fracture. Materials and methods: Between January, 2010 and December, 2020, 122 patients with GT fracture underwent operative fixation. Either OR/IF using proximal humeral locking plate (50 patients) or arthroscopic suture anchor (72 patients) fixation was performed. Fourteen patients were lost to follow-up and finally, 108 patients were enrolled in this study. We divided these patients into two groups: (1) OR/IF group (Group I: 44 patients) and arthroscopic anchor fixation group (Group II: 64 patients). The primary outcome was subjective shoulder function (shoulder functional scale). Secondary outcomes were range of motion, and complications including GT fixation failure, fracture migration, or neurologic complication. Also, age, sex, BMI, operation time, shoulder dislocation, fracture comminution, AP (anteroposterior), SI (superoinferior) size and displacement were evaluated and compared between two groups. Results: Both groups showed satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes at mid-term follow-up. Between 2 groups, there were no significant differences in age, sex, BMI, presence of shoulder dislocation or comminution. Group II showed higher clinical scores except VAS score (p < 0.05) and longer surgical times (95.3 vs. 61.5 min). Largest fracture displacement (Group I vs. II: SI displacement: 40 vs. 13 mm, and AP displacement: 49 vs. 11 mm) and higher complication rate (p = 0.049) was found in Group I. Conclusions: Both arthroscopic anchor fixation and open plate fixation methods showed satisfactory outcomes at mid-term follow-up. Among them, OR/IF is preferred for larger fracture displacement (> 5 mm) and shorter operation time However, arthroscopic anchor fixation group showed better clinical outcomes and less complications than the OR/IF group. Level of evidence: Level 4, Case series with subgroup analysis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The management of failed tibial fracture fixation remains a challenge for orthopaedic surgeons. This study investigate the utility and outcomes of circular external fixation in the management of failed internal fixation of tibial fractures. Methods: Retrospective review of a prospectively collected database of a complex limb reconstruction unit at a major trauma centre was done during December 2022. Patients with failed internal fixation of tibial fracture who underwent revision surgery with circular external fixation frame were included. Results: 20 patients with a mean age of 47.8 ± 16.5 years (range: 15–69) were included. Fourteen (70.0%) patients had failed plate and screws fixations, and the remaining six (30.0%) failed intramedullary nail fixation. The most common indication for revision surgery was development of early postoperative surgical site infection (5 patients; 25.0%). The mean duration of frame treatment was 199.5 ± 80.1 days (range = 49–364), while the mean follow-up duration following frame removal was 3.2 ± 1.8 years (range = 2–8). The overall union rate in this series was 100%; and all infected cases had complete resolution from infection. The total number of complications was 11, however, only two complications required surgical intervention. The most common complications reported were pin site infection (6; 30.0%) and limb length discrepancy of 2 cm (2; 10.0%). Conclusions: Circular external fixation is a reliable surgical option in the treatment of failed internal fixation of tibia fractures. This technique can provide limb salvage in complex infected and noninfected cases with a high union rate and minimal major complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Fracture blisters, a common soft-tissue complication of pilon fractures, are associated with post-operative wound infections, delays in definitive fixation, and alterations in surgical plan. The purpose of this study was to (1) identify the delay in surgery attributable to the presence fracture blisters and (2) investigate the relationship of fracture blisters to comorbidities and fracture severity. Methods: Patients with pilon fractures at an urban level 1 Trauma center from 2010 to 2021 were identified. The presence or absence of fracture blisters was noted, along with location. Demographic information, time from injury to external fixator placement, and time to definitive open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) were collected. Pilon fractures were classified according to AO/OTA guidelines using CT imaging and plain radiographs. Results: 314 patients with pilon fractures were available for analysis, eighty (25%) of whom were found to have fracture blisters. Patients with fracture blisters had longer time to surgery compared to those without fracture blisters (14.2 days vs 7.9 days, p < 0.001). A greater proportion of patients with fracture blisters had AO/OTA 43C fracture patterns, compared with those without fracture blisters (71.3% vs 53.8%, p = 0.03). Fractures blisters were less likely to be localized over the posterior ankle (12%, p = 0.007). Conclusion: The presence of fracture blisters in pilon fractures are associated with significant delays in time to definitive fixation and higher energy fracture patterns. Fracture blisters are less commonly located over the posterior ankle which may support the implementation of a staged posterolateral approach when managing these injures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To determine the effect of time to surgery on outcomes following open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of both-bone forearm fractures (BBFFs). Methods: Ninety-nine patients who underwent ORIF of BBFFs in a single academic medical center over a 16-year time period were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic and clinical data including age, sex, current smoking status, time from injury to surgery (tsurg), presence of open injury, polytrauma status, and complications were obtained. Radiographs of the affected extremity were reviewed for fracture morphology, reduction quality, and time to union (or presence of nonunion). In addition to descriptive statistics, Chi-square and Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney tests were used to compare categorical and interval, respectively, with a significance level of 0.05. Results: A tsurg > 48 h was associated with increased rate of delayed unions (tsurg < 48 h: 25% vs tsurg > 48 h: 59%, p = 0.03), but not complications (tsurg < 48 h: 44% vs tsurg > 48 h: 47%, p = 0.79). Open BBFFs were not associated with increased rates of delayed unions (closed: 16% vs open: 19%, p = 0.77) or complications (closed: 42% vs open: 53%, p = 0.29). A trend toward increased time to union with tsurg > 48 h was also seen, but did not reach significance (tsurg < 48 h: 13.5 weeks vs tsurg > 48 h: 15.7 weeks, p = 0.11). Conclusion: A tsurg > 48 h is associated with an increased rate of delayed union, but not complications, after ORIF of BBFFs. Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level III (Retrospective Cohort). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Tibial shaft fractures are the most common type of long-bone fractures. External fixation (EF) and intramedullary nailing (IMN) are widely used surgical techniques for the definitive fixation of open tibial shaft fractures. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare EF to IMN for the definitive fixation of open tibial fractures. Methods: Medline, Embase, and CENTRAL databases were searched for eligible studies. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared EF to IMN for skeletally mature adults with open tibial fracture (Gustilo I, II, and III). We evaluated the following outcomes: superficial infection, pin-track infection, deep infection, malunion, nonunion, delayed union, and implant/hardware failure. The risk ratio (RR) was used to represent the desired outcomes. The statistical analysis was performed using the random-effects model. Results: A total of 12 RCTs that enrolled 1090 participants were deemed eligible for the analysis. EF showed a significantly higher rate of superficial infection, pin track infection, and malunion compared to IMN (RR = 2.30, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.34 to 3.95; RR = 13.52, 95% CI: 6.16 to 29.66; RR = 2.29, 95% CI 1.41 to 3.73, respectively). No substantial difference was found between EF and IMN in terms of deep infection, nonunion, delayed union, or implant/hardware failure (RR = 1.15, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.98; RR = 0.92, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.10; RR = 1.50, 95% CI 0.98 to 3.33; RR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.36 to 2.60, respectively). Discussion: The findings of our meta-analysis are consistent with the previous systematic reviews excepts for the implant/hardware failure which was found to be significant in favour of IMN by one of the previous reviews. Conclusion: This meta-analysis confirms that IMN is better than EF with respect to clinical outcomes and complication rate for the definitive fixation of open tibial fracture. Highlights: External fixation (EF) and intramedullary nailing (IN) are widely used for the definitive fixation of open tibial fractures. IMN is more preferred as it is associated with lower risk of infection. Recent randomized clinical trials demonstrated similar risk of infection between the two surgical techniques. We aimed to provide an updated meta-analysis comparing EF to IMN for the definitive fixation of open tibial fractures with respect to infection rate and fracture healing problems. Our review revealed that IMN offers lower rates of superficial infection, pin-track infection, and malunion, supporting the use of IMN over EF for the definitive fixation of open tibial fractures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Volar locking plate fixation (VLPF) is the most common method for operative fixation of distal radius fractures (DRF). The dorsal ulnar corner (DUC) can be difficult to stabilize as the fragment is small and not exposed when using the volar approach. The purpose of this study was to study fracture fragment migration after VLPF of AO type C DRF, using a volume registration technique of paired CT scans with special focus on the DUC fragment. Materials and Methods: This pilot study included ten patients with AO type C DRF, all operated with VLPF. The primary outcome was radiographic outcome. Postoperative and 1-year scans were compared and analyzed. Fragment migration was assessed with CT-based micromotion analysis (CTMA), a software technique used for volume registration of paired CT scans. Results: All plates were stable over time. Two patients showed signs of screw movement (0.2–0.35 mm and 0.35– > 1 mm respectively). Postoperative reduction was maintained, and there was no fragment migration at the 1-year follow-up except for one case with increased dorsal tilt. The DUC fragment was found in 8/10 cases, fixated in 7/8 cases, and not dislocated in any case at the 1-year follow-up. Conclusion: The CTMA results indicate that variable-angle VLPF after AO type C DRF can yield and maintain a highly stable reduction of the fracture fragments. The DUC fragment remained stable regardless of the number of screws through the fragment. CT volume registration can be a valuable tool in the detailed assessment of fracture fragment migration following volar plate fixation of DRFs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The current clinical options for the treatment of femoral neck fractures include traditional cannulated screw fixation, dynamic hip screw fixation, hip replacement and the latest femoral neck system (FNS). FNS was noted and popular for exhibiting excellent mechanical properties. In this study, a three-dimensional finite element method was used to analyze the FNS and optimize the design of a new type of internal fixation with four different screw heads based on the analysis results. In the results of the FNS analysis, the portion of the screw implanted into the femoral head was smaller stressed and larger displaced, material consumption was increased due to the use of two screws here. The steel plate and locking screw construction allowed for more uniform internal stress on the fixation and femur. Among the four types of screw head internal fixation, the pyramid screw head internal fixation has more balanced mechanical properties. In the comparison of the pyramid screw head internal fixation with the FNS, the stress and displacement data of the pyramid screw head internal fixation were shown to be superior. The single size design of the FNS did not have the best therapeutic effect on people whose femoral size deviates greatly from the average value, and the new type of internal fixation with adjustable length and angle could be more widely used. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of robot-assisted percutaneous hollow screw placement combined with tarsal sinus incisions for treating calcaneal fractures. Methods: Clinical data of 50 patients with calcaneal fractures treated from January 2018 to June 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. Twenty-six patients (26 feet) were included in the traditional group (traditional surgical reduction and internal fixation) and 24 (24 feet) in the robot-assisted group (robot-assisted internal fixation of tarsal sinus incision). The operation time, C-arm fluoroscopy dose, fracture healing time, Gissane angle, Böhler angle, calcaneal width, calcaneal height, visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, and American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scores were compared between the groups preoperatively and two years postoperatively. Results: Operation time was significantly longer in the traditional group than in the robot-assisted group, while the intraoperative C-arm fluoroscopy dose was significantly lower in the robot-assisted than in the traditional group (P < 0.05). Both groups were followed up for 24–26 months (average, 24.9 months). Two years postoperatively, the Gissane angle, Böhler angle, calcaneal height, and calcaneal width improved significantly in both groups, without significant differences. Fracture healing time was not significantly different in both groups (P > 0.05). The two year postoperative VAS and AOFAS scores in both groups were significantly higher than the preoperative scores, but the robot-assisted group postoperative AOFAS scores were significantly higher than those in the traditional group (t = − 3.775, P = 0.000). Conclusion: Robot-assisted internal fixation of tarsal sinus incision is effective in treating calcaneal fractures with satisfactory long-term follow-up outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The treatment of periprosthetic femur fractures around a total knee replacement remains a technical challenge for the orthopedic surgeon. Management options include non-operative treatment, plate fixation, intramedullary nailing and distal femur replacement (DFR), with few studies comparing fixation with DFR. This is an up-to-date meta-analysis in the literature to directly compare clinical outcomes between fixation and distal femoral replacement in the treatment of supracondylar periprosthetic femur fractures. Methods: A stratified literature search of the Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane databases was performed. All studies in English language were searched from inception to July 2022. The search was performed with the following MeSH terms: Periprosthetic fracture AND ORIF OR Internal Fixation AND Distal Femur Replacement. The search was conducted using a predesigned search strategy where all eligible literature was critically appraised for methodological quality using the Cochrane collaboration tool. We included Level I, II and III studies comparing fixation with DFR in the treatment of periprosthetic supracondylar femur fractures. Data from eligible studies were extracted by two authors (NP and AR) and a table created which included author, year, sample size, mean age, measured parameters, follow-up period, fracture classification, length of stay (days), mortality rate, revision rate and complication rate. Results: The extracted data were pooled for meta-analysis using RevMan® v5.3.5 software (Nordic Cochrane Centre, Copenhagen, Denmark) and forest plots constructed. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant and confidence intervals (CI) set to 95%. A total of six studies were included in the meta-analysis (n = 406). 153 patients underwent distal femur replacement and 253 patients underwent fixation with a mean follow-up time of 71.4 months. The results of this analysis suggest no statistically significant difference in measured outcomes. Conclusion: The results of this meta-analysis suggest no proven statistically significant difference between DFR and fixation in terms of length of hospital stay, mortality rate, revision rate and complication rate for the treatment of periprosthetic supracondylar femur fractures. Further prospective randomized research may help to define the specific indications for each treatment option which must include fracture configuration. Early functional outcome and cost-effectiveness have yet to be evaluated in the available literature. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Die Unfallchirurgie is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Introduction: Fixation of femoral neck fractures with cannulated screws is an accepted method. This study aimed to compare a novel guide device and conventional technique with regard to the accuracy, operation time, fluoroscopy numbers, and drilling attempts during the insertion of cannulated screws to internal fixation of femoral neck fractures. Methods: This retrospective study included 60 patients with intracapsular femoral neck fractures who were treated with cannulated screws from January 2020 to June 2021. Three screws were inserted into the femoral neck by conventional technique or using the novel guide device. The operative time, total drilling attempts, and fluoroscopy numbers were evaluated. The precision of implant placement was evaluated by screw parallelism and spread. The patients were followed for 12–24 months. Results: The fluoroscopy numbers and operation time of the guide-device-assisted group were shorter than for the conventional group (p < 0.05). The total drilling attempts were significantly lower with the guide device than in the conventional group (p < 0.05). The guide-device-assisted group had better screw parallelism and greater spread than the conventional group (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The novel guide device may be an effective assistant instrument for internal fixation of femoral neck fracture with cannulated screws. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Die Unfallchirurgie is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Purpose: Open talus fractures are notoriously difficult to manage, and they are commonly associated with a high level of complications including non-union, avascular necrosis and infection. Currently, the management of such injuries is based upon BOAST 4 guidelines although there is no suggested definitive management, and thus, definitive management is based upon surgeon preference. The key principles of open talus fracture management which do not vary between surgeons are early debridement, orthoplastic wound care, anatomic reduction and definitive fixation whenever possible. However, there is much debate over whether the talus should be preserved or removed after open talus fracture/dislocation and proceeded to tibiocalcaneal fusion. Methods: A review of electronic hospital records for open talus fractures from 2014 to 2021 returned fourteen patients with fifteen open talus fractures. Seven cases were initially managed with ORIF, and five cases were definitively managed with FUSION, while the others were managed with alternative methods. We collected patient's age, gender, surgical complications, surgical risk factors and post-treatment functional ability and pain and compliance with BOAST guidelines. The average follow-up of the cohort was 4 years and one month. EQ-5D-5L and FAAM-ADL/Sports score was used as a patient reported outcome measure. Data were analysed using the software PRISM. Results: Comparison between FUSION and ORIF groups showed no statistically significant difference in EQ-5D-5L score (P = 0.13), FAAM-ADL (P = 0.20), FAAM-Sport (P = 0.34), infection rate (P = 0.55), surgical times (P = 0.91) and time to weight bearing (P = 0.39), despite a higher proportion of polytrauma and Hawkins III and IV fractures in the FUSION group. Conclusion: FUSION is typically used as second line to ORIF or failed ORIF. However, there is a lack of studies that directly compared outcome in open talus fracture patients definitively managed with FUSION or ORIF. Our results demonstrate for the first time that FUSION may not be inferior to ORIF in terms of patient functional outcome, infection rate and quality of life, in the management of patients with open talus fracture patients. Of note, as open talus fractures have increased risks of complications such as osteonecrosis and non-union, FUSION should be considered as a viable option to mitigate these potential complications in these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The optimal treatment for radiation-induced fragility fractures of the pelvis (RI-FFP) is not well evaluated due to the rarity of the condition. Purpose: The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the prevalence of RI-FFP, the radiological and clinical outcomes as well as the complications of patients treated with internal fixation. Methods: A retrospective review of our database was performed to identify all surgically treated patients with RI-FFP. Surgical stabilization was recommended for patients with FFP type III and FFP type IV. Surgical stabilization was also recommended after 5–7 days for patients with FFP type II in case of unsuccessful conservative treatment. Demographic data, fracture patterns according to the FFP classification of Rommens and Hofmann, type of treatment and surgery-related complications including nonunion, hardware failure, fracture progression (secondary fracture) or infection were documented. Results: Among 500 patients with FFP, the prevalence of patients with RI-FFP was 1% (5/500): 5 patients with a median age of 79 years (76–79). The median time interval from radiation to fracture was 18 months (18–24). All of them underwent internal fixation. Two patients experienced surgery-related complications, one due to hardware failure and one due to fracture progression. At median follow-up of 27 months, all fractures had healed. Patients reached a good level of mobility with a median Parker Mobility Score of 7 and suffered moderate pain with a median value of 2.5 on the numeric rating scale. Conclusion: RI-FFP remains a rare injury (1%). In our experience, patients, who underwent surgical treatment, obtained a high level of mobility and a moderate pain score after 2 years of follow-up. Internal fixation can be recommended in RI-FFP. Because bone healing may be impaired due to previous irradiation, highly stable constructs are required to avoid fracture progression or revision surgery. Level of evidence: III, retrospective study [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Intramedullary (IM) nail use for metaphyseal fracture management is problematic in long bones like the femur because the larger medullary cavity allows increased fracture motion and potentially increased implant failure and malunion/nonunion risk; Achieving effective distal femur fracture fixation is even more difficult in osteoporotic bone. Blocking screws to control IM nail movement are known to be effective for tibia fracture management. Few studies have evaluated IM nail and blocking screw use efficacy for distal femur fracture fixation in osteoporotic bone.Methods: This study used an osteoporosis simulation synthetic bone model to evaluate retrograde IM nail fixation of a standardized non-comminuted, extra-articular distal femur fracture with and without blocking screws. The hypothesis was that use of one or two blocking screws would increase IM nail fixation stability as evidenced by greater peak IM nail load and lesser movement. A servohydraulic device under displacement control collected loading force versus movement deflection data. Shapiro-Wilk tests confirmed data normality. One-way analysis of variance and Tukey post hoc tests were used to compare condition specific loading force and movement differences.Result: In the coronal plane, blocking screw conditions displayed greater loading ranges (38.3 ± 2 vs. 19.1 ± 2 N, 100.5% difference) (p < 0.0001) and lesser movement (2.0 ± 0.3 vs. 6.86 ± 0.4 mm, 243% difference) (p < 0.0001). In the sagittal plane, the two blocking screw condition displayed a significantly greater loading magnitude (29.9 ± 6 vs. 20.8 ± 2.3 N, 43.8% difference) than the identical control condition without blocking screws (p = 0.018); however, movements were comparable (p = 0.82). Long-axis rotational loading failed to reveal load magnitude differences (p = 0.28); however, two different blocking screw conditions displayed decreased movement (1.32 ± 0.2 vs. 2.05 ± 0.3 mm, 53.8% difference) compared to other conditions (p ≤ 0.018).Conclusions: Use of one or two blocking screws on the medial and lateral sides of the IM nail decreased coronal plane movement in the intramedullary canal. Combining retrograde IM nail implantation with blocking screws reduced medial-lateral IM nail movement and increased fracture stability. These characteristics may help prevent fixation failure, malunion, and even nonunion in patients with a distal femur fracture in osteoporotic bone. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is a popular method for treatment of displaced Lisfranc injuries. However, even with anatomic reduction and solid internal fixation, treatment does not provide good outcomes in certain severe dislocations. The purpose of this study was to compare ORIF and primary arthrodesis (PA) of the first tarsometatarsal (TMT) joint for Lisfranc injuries with the first TMT joint dislocation. Methods: Seventy-eight Lisfranc injuries with first TMT joint dislocation were finally enrolled and analyzed in a prospective, randomized trial comparing ORIF and PA. They were 50 males and females with a mean age of 40.7 years and randomized to ORIF group and PA group. Outcome measures included radiographs, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) midfoot scale, Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) Sports subscale, visual analog scale (VAS), and the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). Complications and revision rate were also analyzed. Results: Forty patients were treated by ORIF, while PA group includes 38 cases. Patients were followed up for 37.8(range, 24–48) months. At final follow-up, the mean AOFAS midfoot score (P < 0.01), the FAAM Sports subscale (P < 0.01), the physical function score (P < 0.05), and the Bodily Pain score of SF-36 (P < 0.05) after ORIF treatment were significantly lower than PA group. The mean VAS score in ORIF group was higher (P < 0.01). In ORIF group, redislocation of the first TMT joint was observed in ten cases, and thirteen patients had pain in midfoot. No redislocation and no hardware failure were identified in PA group. Conclusion: PA of the first TMT joint provided a better medium-term outcome than ORIF for Lisfranc injuries with the first TMT dislocation. Possible complications and revision could be avoided by PA for dislocated first ray injuries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Traditionally, partially threaded cancellous lag screws (PTCS) are used for most medial malleolar fractures but are often challenging to execute in elderly patients because of the high risk of postoperative complications. Limited literature explores whether hook-type locking compression plates (LCPs) reliably offer better outcomes than PTCS in elderly patients. We aimed to compare the midterm radiologic and clinical outcomes between hook-type LCP and PTCS for medial malleolar fractures in an elderly population. Methods: We included 258 patients, aged 65 years and above, treated with either a hook-type locking plate (hook LCP group: 121 patients) or PTCS (screw group: 137 patients), and with follow-ups of at least 36 months in this retrospective study. Radiographic assessments included the union rate and interval to fracture union. Clinical assessment included the postoperative complications and revision procedures. Results: Although a significantly higher rate of comminuted fractures was observed in the hook LCP group than in the screw group (p <.001), no significant difference in the union rate was observed between the two groups (hook LCP group: 93.4% vs. screw group: 89.8%, p =.151), and a significantly shorter interval to union was observed in the hook LCP group (10.2 ± 7.0 vs. 12.3 ± 6.7 weeks, p =.015). There was a trend toward a lower rate of complications, including revision procedures, in the hook LCP group than in the screw group (19.9% vs. 28.5%, p =.107 and 6.6% vs. 13.8%, p =.074). Conclusion: Hook-type LCP may be an alternative option for treating medial malleolar fractures with comminution in elderly patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Percutaneous compression plate (PCCP) provides superior anti-rotational abilities and mechanical strength in femoral neck fractures (FNFs). The first series reporting its utilization of FNFs was promising. Since the long-term outcome regarding the implant has not been reported, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term functional outcomes and complications after fixation using PCCP in FNFs. Materials and methods: From 2010 to 2019, 51 patients aged from 18 to 87 years were evaluated; 11 patients were excluded from this study. Demographic data, fracture classification, and complications were analyzed. Besides plain radiographs and CT, uptake ratios using bone scintigraphy and/or SPECT were also collected and analyzed. Results: At a mean follow-up of 4.4 ± 2.0 years (range, 2–10 years), the mean Harris hip score was 88, with 44 patients (86.3%) achieving excellent or good outcomes. The rate of complication was 13.7% (7/51), with five cases of osteonecrosis of the femoral head (OFNH). Hip replacements were performed in four (7.8%) cases. After confirmation of normal transfusion status, 11 patients underwent elective removal of the implant without further complications. Conclusion: Closed reduction and internal fixation using PCCP in FNFs resulted in satisfactory outcomes with low complication rates. Longer follow-up (3–5 years) and sequential bone scintigraphy or SPECT after surgery are recommended after internal fixation using PCCP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The presence of a posterior malleolar (PM) fragment has a negative prognostic impact in ankle fractures. The best treatment is still subject to debate. The aim of this study was to assess the medium-to-long-term clinical and functional outcome of ankle fractures with a PM fragment in a larger patient population. Materials and methods: One hundred patients (69 women, 31 men, average age 60 years) with ankle fractures including the PM were evaluated clinically and radiographically. Patients with Bartoníček–Rammelt type 3 and 4 fracture displayed a significant female preponderance. Fixation of the PM was performed in 63% and tailored to the individual fracture pattern. Results: Internal fixation of the PM fragment was negatively correlated with the need for syndesmotic screw placement at the time of surgery (p = 0.010). At an average follow-up of 7.0 years, the mean Foot Function Index (FFI) was 16.5 (SD: 21.5), the Olerud Molander Ankle Score (OMAS) averaged 80.2 (SD: 24) and the American Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle/hindfoot score averaged 87.5 (SD: 19.1). The maximum score of 100 was achieved by 44% of patients. The physical (PCS) and mental health component summary (MCS) scores of the SF-36 averaged 47.7 (SD: 12.51) and 50.5 (SD: 9.36), respectively. Range of motion was within 3.4 (SD: 6.63) degrees of the uninjured side. The size of the PM fragment had no prognostic value. There was a trend to lower outcome scores with slight anterior or posterior shift of the distal fibula within the tibial incisura. Patients who underwent primary internal fixation had significantly superior SF-36 MCS than patients who underwent staged internal fixation (p = 0.031). Conclusions: With an individualized treatment protocol, tailored to the CT-based assessment of PM fractures, favorable medium and long-term results can be expected. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To evaluate the biomechanical performances of the sacroiliac screw fixation of the first sacral vertebra with different lengths of screws using the Finite-Element Method. Methods: First, pelvic CT images were generated from a healthy volunteer, and multislice sagittal views were produced to determine the axis for the first sacral vertebra geometric osseous fixation pathway (GOFP). Subsequently, according to the geometric size and mechanical parameters of the iliosacral screw, the screw models with the same diameter of 7.3 mm and different lengths of 80 mm, 90 mm, 100 mm, 110 mm, 120 mm, 130 mm and 140 mm were built. Then the seven screws were assembled with the pelvic model. The maximum von Mises stress and the shape variables were evaluated for the pelvis and the screws. Results: Results are shown for the pelvic and GOFP screw, respectively. The simulation results show that the maximum von Mises stress in the cortex of the pelvic ring of the pelvis with the 130-mm length screw is the lowest among the pelvic models with different screws. Moreover, the peak displacement of the pelvis with the 130-mm length screw is the smallest. These results indicate that under the standing condition, a 130-mm length screw can decrease the stress concentration and result in a more effective transfer of stress within the reconstructed pelvis. In addition, the displacement of the screw with a 130-mm length is the smallest among all the considered screws. The peak von Mises stresses in the 130-mm length screw and the cortex are still within a low and elastic range below the yielding strengths of the materials. Conclusion: Through the finite element analysis, the GOFP can be used as a safe and effective way for iliosacral screw fixation. The optimal length of the screw may be 130 mm length. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Currently, sacroiliac joint dislocations, including crescent fracture–dislocations, are treated using several techniques that have certain issues. We present the technical details and clinical outcomes of a new technique, anterior sacroiliac stabilisation (ASIS), performed using spinal instrumentation. Methods: ASIS is performed with the patient in a supine position via the ilioinguinal approach. The displacements are reduced and fixed by inserting cancellous screws from the sacral ala and iliac brim; the screw heads are bridged using a rod and locked. We performed a retrospective review of patients with iliosacral disruption who underwent ASIS between May 2012 and December 2020 at two medical facilities. The patients were assessed for age, sex, injury type, associated injuries, complications, functional outcome by evaluating the Majeed pelvic score after excluding the sexual intercourse score and fracture union. Results: We enrolled 11 patients (median age: 63 years). The median operative time was 195 min, median blood loss was 570 g, and eight patients (72.3%) required blood transfusion. The sacral and iliac screws had a diameter of 6.0–8.0 mm and 6.2–8.0 mm, and a length of 50–70 mm and 40–80 mm, respectively. Bone union was achieved with no marked loss of reduction in the median follow-up period of 12 months in all cases. The median Majeed score at the final follow-up was 85/96. Conclusion: ASIS is a rigid internal fixation method that provides angular stability. Despite invasiveness issues compared to iliosacral screw fixation, this method is easy to confirm and achieves precise reduction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Although most paediatric radial neck fractures can be treated with closed reduction, some severely displaced fractures require open reduction. The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of ESIN and KW fixation in open reduction of radial neck fracture in children. Methods: Twenty-four patients with mean age of 8.5 years were included. Four of the patients had a Judet type III fracture and 20 had a Judet type IV fracture. Ten patients who underwent percutaneous KW fixation were assigned to group A, while 14 patients who underwent ESIN fixation were assigned to group B. Variables of interest included age, sex, fracture type, associated lesions, surgical time, fracture reduction, cost, follow-up, healing time, X-rays, clinical outcomes, and complications. Results: There were no significant between-group differences in sex, age, additional injuries, fracture type, and quality of reduction. Costs were significantly lower in Group A. Fracture healing was achieved in 23 of 24 patients (10/10 in group A and 13/14 in group B). In a postoperative elbow function assessment based on the Steele and Graham classification, 80% of patients in group A had a score of excellent or good, compared to 78.6% of patients in group B. Two cases of nail shifting and joint protrusion were observed in group B, one of which also presented with nonunion during follow-up. Conclusions: Both KW and ESIN may achieve good clinical outcomes, but KW is associated with lower costs, easier implant removal (without the need for a secondary surgery), and lower iatrogenic complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Open fractures of the scapula are relatively rare and only a few studies are interested in this subject. This study aims to demonstrate the results of internal fixation of open scapula fractures due to gunshot injuries. Materials and methods: Eight patients who had open scapula fractures and were treated by internal fixation through the conventional Judet approach included in this study. Patients were followed up monthly in the first 6 months and every 2 months in the rest of the follow-up. Shoulder range of motion, Constant Shoulder Score, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score were used for functional evaluation. Results: The average follow-up period was 34.6 ± 11.9 months. The average time between injuries and the surgery was 10.5 ± 5.1 days. The average shoulder abduction of the patients was 135.6 ± 18.8°, the average forward flexion of the shoulder was 160 ± 19.2°. The average internal and external rotations of the shoulders were 80 ± 14.1° and 63.1 ± 17.3°, respectively. CSS was calculated as 79.8 ± 14.4, and DASH was calculated as 14.1 ± 14.9. Conclusions: In the treatment of open scapula fractures due to gunshot injuries, an internal fixation is a reliable option and the results were comparable with previous studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To carry out clinical in vivo evaluation of efficiency of the 2-mm lambda plate for open reduction and internal fixation of condylar fractures. Materials and Methods: This prospective clinical study was conducted on a group of 16 patients who underwent open reduction for subcondylar fractures of the mandible and fixation using a 2-mm 7-holed titanium lambda miniplate. Results: The average surgical time was found to be 79.5 min. The ease of access was found to be adequate in 13 cases (81.3%). All patients showed a gradual improvement in mouth opening and occlusion over the post-operative follow-up period. The maximum mouth opening seen at 3-month follow-up was 54 mm. None of the patients had transient or permanent weakness of the facial nerve. In our study, we encountered one case of hardware failure (6.25%). Conclusion: The 2-mm lambda condylar miniplate provides an excellent stabilisation of the fractured subcondylar segments and ensures satisfactory results, confirmed both clinically and radiographically. The plate reduces the amount of surgical exposure needed and does not cause any significant post-operative complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The quality and durability of fracture reduction play an important role in the functional prognosis of articulation. The purpose of this study was to investigate the radiological and clinical effects of compression bolts in the treatment of Schatzker I-IV tibial plateau fractures (TPFs).Methods: Between May 2015 and April 2018, a total of 96 consecutive adult patients with operatively treated Schatzker I-IV TPFs were included and divided into two groups according to the internal fixations: Group 1 (unilateral locking plate) and Group 2 (unilateral locking plate combined with compression bolt). Data on demographic and fracture characteristics, postoperative follow-up imaging, intraoperative indicators, postoperative reduction quality and durability, clinical outcomes, and complications were retrospectively collected and compared between the two groups.Results: There were no significant intergroup differences in preoperative baseline data, duration of operation, intra-operative blood loss, days in hospital, rate of immediate post-operative reduction loss, or complications. The time of fracture healing, the rate of secondary reduction loss, and the mean WOMAC score were significantly reduced compared with those in Group 1 (P = 0.024, 0.015, and 0.024, respectively). There were significant intergroup differences in the mean HSS score (89.0 ± 11.4 vs. 94.4 ± 6.7, P = 0.042), the mean Lysholm score (83.8 ± 9.6 vs. 88.4 ± 5.2, P = 0.027), and the mean SF-36 score (82.8 ± 12.5 vs. 90.5 ± 7.6, P = 0.001). Additionally, there were similar significant differences in subgroup analysis (only included patients with Schatzker II-III), except for WOMAC score.Conclusion: Compared with unilateral locking plate fixation, unilateral locking plate combined with compressing bolt fixation can reduce the rate of secondary reduction loss, accelerate fracture healing, and show better clinical outcomes for patients with Schatzker I-IV TPFs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The study aimed to investigate the association between out-of-hours surgery and postoperative mortality in hip fracture patients. Furthermore, internal fixation and arthroplasty were compared to determine if a difference could be observed in patients operated with these techniques at different times during the day. Methods: All patients above 18 of age years in Sweden who underwent hip fracture surgery between 2008 and 2017 were eligible for inclusion. Pathological fractures, non-operatively managed fractures, or cases whose time of surgery was missing were excluded. The cohort was subdivided into on-hour (08:00–17:00) and out-of-hours surgery (17:00–08:00). Poisson regression with adjustments for confounders was used to evaluate the association between out-of-hours surgery and both 30-day and 90-day postoperative mortality. Results: Out-of-hours surgery was associated with a 5% increase in the risk of both 30-day [adj. IRR (95% CI) 1.05 (1.00–1.10), p = 0.040] and 90-day [adj. IRR (95% CI) 1.05 (1.01–1.09), p = 0.005] mortality after hip fracture surgery compared to on-hour surgery. There was no statistically significant association between out-of-hours surgery and postoperative mortality among patients who received an internal fixation. Arthroplasties performed out-of-hours were associated with a 13% increase in 30-day postoperative mortality [adj. IRR (95% CI) 1.13 (1.04–1.23), p = 0.005] and an 8% increase in 90-day postoperative mortality [adj. IRR (95% CI) 1.08 (1.01–1.15), p = 0.022] compared to on-hour surgery. Conclusion: Out-of-hours surgical intervention is associated with an increase in both 30- and 90-day postoperative mortality among hip fracture patients who received an arthroplasty, but not among patients who underwent internal fixation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]