1. 2D cine vs. 3D self-navigated free-breathing high-resolution whole heart cardiovascular magnetic resonance for aortic root measurements in congenital heart disease
- Author
-
Clement Nussbaumer, Matthias Stuber, Jürg Schwitter, Davide Piccini, C Blanche, Pierre Monney, Anna-Giulia Pavon, Tobias Rutz, and Judith Bouchardy
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy ,Bicuspid aortic valve ,Heart disease ,Aortic root ,Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine ,Aortic root dilatation ,High resolution ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Bicuspid Aortic Valve Disease ,Predictive Value of Tests ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system ,Humans ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Congenital heart disease ,Retrospective Studies ,Angiology ,Radiological and Ultrasound Technology ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Research ,Reproducibility of Results ,Magnetic resonance imaging ,medicine.disease ,3D self-navigation whole heart ,Cross-Sectional Studies ,RC666-701 ,Aortic Valve ,cardiovascular system ,Cardiology ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business ,Free breathing - Abstract
Background Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is considered the method of choice for evaluation of aortic root dilatation in congenital heart disease. Usually, a cross-sectional 2D cine stack is acquired perpendicular to the vessel’s axis. However, this method requires a considerable patient collaboration and precise planning of image planes. The present study compares a recently introduced 3D self-navigated free-breathing high-resolution whole heart CMR sequence (3D self nav) allowing a multiplanar retrospective reconstruction of the aortic root as an alternative to the 2D cine technique for determination of aortic root diameters. Methods A total of 6 cusp-commissure (CuCo) and cusp-cusp (CuCu) enddiastolic diameters were measured by two observers on 2D cine and 3D self nav cross-sectional planes of the aortic root acquired on a 1.5 T CMR scanner. Asymmetry of the aortic root was evaluated by the ratio of the minimal to the maximum 3D self nav CuCu diameter. CuCu diameters were compared to standard transthoracic echocardiographic (TTE) aortic root diameters. Results Sixty-five exams in 58 patients (32 ± 15 years) were included. Typically, 2D cine and 3D self nav spatial resolution was 1.1–1.52 × 4.5-7 mm and 0.9–1.153 mm, respectively. 3D self nav yielded larger maximum diameters than 2D cine: CuCo 37.2 ± 6.4 vs. 36.2 ± 7.0 mm (p = 0.006), CuCu 39.7 ± 6.3 vs. 38.5 ± 6.5 mm (p Conclusion Both, the 3D self nav and 2D cine CMR techniques allow reliable determination of aortic root diameters. However, we propose to privilege the 3D self nav technique and measurement of CuCu diameters to avoid underestimation of the maximum diameter, particularly in patients with asymmetric aortic roots and/or BAV.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF