Search

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of induction in women with a single prior Caesarean section.This was a cohort study in which we included all singleton pregnancies in patients with a single prior Caesarean who delivered between 2007 and 2012. Methods of induction were ocytocic infusion plus amniotomy (if Bishop score ≥6) or insertion of a Foley catheter (Bishop6).Of the 2,075 patients included, 806 (38.8 %) had an elective repeat Caesarean, 1,045 (50.4 %) went into spontaneous labour, 89 (4.3 %) were induced by artificial rupture of the membranes and infusion of ocytocics and 135 (6.5 %) were induced using a Foley catheter. Rates of vaginal delivery were 79.2, 79.8 and 43.7 %, respectively. Six cases of uterine rupture were reported in the group of patients who went into spontaneous labour. There was no difference between groups with regard to neonatal morbidity. On multivariate analysis, risk factors for Caesarean delivery were macrosomia (OR 2.04, 95 % CI 1.31-3.18) and induction by Foley catheter (OR 3.73, 95 % CI 2.47-5.62); protective factors were previous vaginal delivery (OR 0.41, 95 % CI 0.29-0.57) and cervical dilatation (OR 0.84, 95 % CI 0.78-0.91).Uterine induction after a single Caesarean section with ocytocic infusion and amniotomy where the cervix is favourable does not appear to entail any significant added risk in terms of maternal or foetal morbidity. Foley catheter induction is a reasonable option if the cervix is not ripe.

To compare intervention rates associated with labor in low-risk women who began their labor in the "home-like birth centre" and the traditional delivery room.This retrospective study used data that were collected from January 2005 through June 2008, from women admitted to the "home-like birth centre" (n=316) and compared to a group of randomly selected low-risk women admitted to the traditional labor ward (n=890) using the Baysian Information Criterion to select the best predictive model.Women in the "home-like birth centre" had spontaneous vaginal deliveries more often (88.6% versus 82.8%, P value 0.034) and perineal lesions less often (60.1% versus 62.5%, P value 0.013). The frequency of adverse neonatal outcomes did not differ statistically between the two groups, although mean clamped at birth umbilical arterial pH level was higher in the "home-like birth centre" group. The transfer rate from "home-like birth centre" to traditional labor ward was 31.3%.It appears that women could benefit from "home-like birth centre" care in settings such as the one studied. Larger observational studies are warranted to validate these results.

Widespread use of intrapartum antimicrobial prophylaxis has significantly reduced the incidence of early-onset neonatal infection (EONI); however, little is known about the effects of increased maternal exposure to antibiotics on late-onset neonatal infection (LONI). This study aims to evaluate LONI epidemiology in our region after the application of French recommendations and to determine whether LONI-causing organisms and their antibiotic susceptibility are influenced by peripartum antibiotic exposure. We performed a prospective epidemiologic study of 139 confirmed and possible cases of bacterial LONI in patients treated with antibiotics for at least 5 days of the 22,458 infants born in our region in the year 2007. The overall incidence of LONI caused by all pathogens, Group B streptococcus (GBS) and Escherichia coli (E. coli) were 6.19, 0.36 and 2.72, respectively, per 1,000 live births. Our findings revealed three major types of LONI: E. coli-induced urinary tract infection (UTI) among term infants, coagulase negative Staphylococcus septicemia affecting preterm infants, and GBS infections with severe clinical presentation. Univariable analysis revealed that maternal antibiotic exposure was significantly associated with the risk of amoxicillin-resistant E. coli infection (p = 0.01). Postnatal antibiotic exposure was associated with an increased risk of E. coli LONI (p = 0.048). This link persisted upon multivariable analysis; however, no additional risk factors were identified for LONI caused by antibiotic-resistant E. coli. Conclusion Our findings confirm that despite the benefits of antenatal antibiotics, this treatment can increase the risk of antibiotic-resistant cases of LONI. National and international surveillance of LONI epidemiology is essential to assess benefits and potential negative consequences of perinatal antibiotic exposure.