Search

Your search keyword '"Christophe, Diagne"' showing total 5 results
Start Over Author "Christophe, Diagne" Publisher springer science and business media llc
5 results on '"Christophe, Diagne"'

1. Capacity of countries to reduce biological invasions

Author

Guillaume Latombe, Hanno Seebens, Bernd Lenzner, Franck Courchamp, Stefan Dullinger, Marina Golivets, Ingolf Kühn, Brian Leung, Núria Roura-Pascual, Emma Cebrian, Wayne Dawson, Christophe Diagne, Jonathan M. Jeschke, Cristian Pérez-Granados, Dietmar Moser, Anna Turbelin, Piero Visconti, Franz Essl, University of Vienna [Vienna], University of Edinburgh, Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK-F), Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main-Senckenberg – Leibniz Institution for Biodiversity and Earth System Research - Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung, Leibniz Association-Leibniz Association, Ecologie Systématique et Evolution (ESE), AgroParisTech-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Helmholtz Zentrum für Umweltforschung = Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Department of Geobotany and Botanical Garden, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle Wittenberg (MLU), McGill University = Université McGill [Montréal, Canada], Universitat de Girona [Girona], Universitat de Girona (UdG), Departament de Ciencies Ambientals, Centre d'Estudis Avançats de Blanes (CEAB), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas [Madrid] (CSIC), Institute of Aquatic Ecology, Durham University, Centre de Biologie pour la Gestion des Populations (UMR CBGP), Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (Cirad)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD [France-Sud])-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE)-Institut Agro Montpellier, Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Université de Montpellier (UM), Freie Universität Berlin, Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (IGB), Berlin-Brandenburg Institute of Advanced Biodiversity Research (BBIB), Universidad de Alicante, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis [Laxenburg] (IIASA), This research was funded through the 2017-2018 Belmont Forum and BiodivERsA joint call for research proposals, under the BiodivScen ERA-Net COFUND programme, and with the funding organisations FWF (project no I 4011-B32–GL, BeL, SD, DM, FE), MCIN/AEI/https://doi.org/10.13039/501100011033 (PCI2018-092966–NRP, CPG, EC), BMBF (16LC1807C–MG, IK, 16LC1807A–HS, 16LC1807B–JMJ) and ANR (NR-18-EBI4-0004–FC, CB, CD, AT)., Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Ecología, Ecología y Conservación de Poblaciones y Comunidades Animales (ECPCA), Department of Botany and Biodiversity Research, Institute of Biology/Geobotany and Botanical Garden, German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv), Institute of Biology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany, Departamento de Ecología, Universidad de Alicante, Alicante, Spain, This research was funded through the 2017-2018 Belmont Forum and BiodivERsA joint call for research proposals, under the BiodivScen ERA-Net COFUND programme, and with the funding organisations FWF (project no I 4011-B32-GL, BeL, SD, DM, FE), MCIN/AEI/https://doi.org/10.13039/501100011033 (PCI2018-092966NRP, CPG, EC), BMBF (16LC1807C-MG, IK, 16LC1807A-HS, 16LC1807B-JMJ) and ANR (ANR-18-EBI4-0004-FC, CB, CD, AT).Document Information, and ANR-18-EBI4-0004,AlienScenarios,Developing and applying scenarios of biological invasions for the 21st century(2018)

Subjects
Governance, Global and Planetary Change, Established alien species, Health (social science), Sociology and Political Science, Ecology, [SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio], Geography, Planning and Development, 500 Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik::570 Biowissenschaften, Biologie::570 Biowissenschaften, Biologie, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Lifestyle, Environmental performance, Scenarios, [SDE]Environmental Sciences, Trade, Innovation, Nature and Landscape Conservation
Abstract

Este artículo contiene 19 páginas, 4 figuras, 2 tablas., The extent and impacts of biological invasions on biodiversity are largely shaped by an array of socio-economic and environmental factors, which exhibit high variation among countries. Yet, a global analysis of how these factors vary across countries is currently lacking. Here, we investigate how five broad, country-specific socio-economic and environmental indices (Governance, Trade, Environmental Performance, Lifestyle and Education, Innovation) explain country-level (1) established alien species (EAS) richness of eight taxonomic groups, and (2) proactive or reactive capacity to prevent and manage biological invasions and their impacts. These indices underpin many aspects of the invasion process, including the introduction, establishment, spread and management of alien species. They are also general enough to enable a global comparison across countries, and are therefore essential for defining future scenarios for biological invasions. Models including Trade, Governance, Lifestyle and Education, or a combination of these, best explained EAS richness across taxonomic groups and national proactive or reactive capacity. Historical (1996 or averaged over 1996–2015) levels of Governance and Trade better explained both EAS richness and the capacity of countries to manage invasions than more recent (2015) levels, revealing a historical legacy with important implications for the future of biological invasions. Using Governance and Trade to define a two-dimensional socio-economic space in which the position of a country captures its capacity to address issues of biological invasions, we identified four main clusters of countries in 2015. Most countries had an increase in Trade over the past 25 years, but trajectories were more geographically heterogeneous for Governance. Declines in levels of Governance are concerning as they may be responsible for larger levels of invasions in the future. By identifying the factors influencing EAS richness and the regions most susceptible to changes in these factors, our results provide novel insights to integrate biological invasions into scenarios of biodiversity change to better inform decision-making for policy and the management of biological invasions., This research was funded through the 2017-2018 Belmont Forum and BiodivERsA joint call for research proposals, under the BiodivScen ERA-Net COFUND programme, and with the funding organisations FWF (project no I 4011-B32–GL, BeL, SD, DM, FE), MCIN/AEI/https:// doi. org/ 10. 13039/ 50110 00110 33 (PCI2018-092966– NRP, CPG, EC), BMBF (16LC1807C–MG, IK; 16LC1807A–HS; 16LC1807B–JMJ) and ANR (NR-18-EBI4-0004–FC, CB, CD, AT).

Published
2022

2. Introduction pathways of economically costly invasive alien species

Author

Anna J. Turbelin, Christophe Diagne, Emma J. Hudgins, Desika Moodley, Melina Kourantidou, Ana Novoa, Philip J. Haubrock, Camille Bernery, Rodolphe E. Gozlan, Robert A. Francis, Franck Courchamp, Ecologie Systématique et Evolution (ESE), AgroParisTech-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Centre de Biologie pour la Gestion des Populations (UMR CBGP), Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (Cirad)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD [France-Sud])-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE)-Institut Agro Montpellier, Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Université de Montpellier (UM), Department of Biology, Carleton University (Carleton University), Carleton University, Institute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences (IB / CAS), Czech Academy of Sciences [Prague] (CAS), University of Southern Denmark (SDU), Hellenic Centre for Marine Research (HCMR), Institute of Marine Biological Resources and Inland Waters, Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum [Frankfurt], Senckenberg – Leibniz Institution for Biodiversity and Earth System Research - Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung, Leibniz Association-Leibniz Association, South Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses [University of South Bohemia] (CENAKVA), Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters [University of South Bohemia], University of South Bohemia -University of South Bohemia, Institut des Sciences de l'Evolution de Montpellier (UMR ISEM), Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (Cirad)-École Pratique des Hautes Études (EPHE), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Institut de recherche pour le développement [IRD] : UR226-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Montpellier (UM), King‘s College London, The authors acknowledge the French National Research Agency (ANR-14-CE02-0021) and the BNP-Paribas Foundation Climate Initiative for funding the InvaCost project that allowed the construction of the InvaCost database. The present work was conducted following a workshop funded by the AXA Research Fund Chair of Invasion Biology and is part of the AlienScenario project funded by BiodivERsA and Belmont-Forum call 2018 on biodiversity scenarios. AJT contract comes from the AXA Research Fund Chair of Invasion Biology of University Paris Saclay. CD is funded by the BiodivERsA-Belmont Forum Project 'Alien Scenarios' (BMBF/PT DLR 01LC1807C). AN and DM acknowledge funding from EXPRO Grant No. 19-28807X (Czech Science Foundation) and long-term research development project RVO 67985939 (The Czech Academy of Sciences)., ANR-14-CE02-0021,InvaCosts,Insectes envahissants et leurs couts pour la biodiversité, l'économie et la santé humaine(2014), University of South Bohemia, and The authors acknowledge the French National Research Agency (ANR-14-CE02-0021) and the BNP-Paribas Foundation Climate Initiative for funding the InvaCost project that allowed the construction of the InvaCost database. The present work was conducted following a workshop funded by the AXA Research Fund Chair of Invasion Biology and is part of the AlienScenario project funded by BiodivERsA and Belmont-Forum call 2018 on biodiversity scenarios. AJT contract comes from the AXA Research Fund Chair of Invasion Biology of University Paris Saclay. CD is funded by the BiodivERsA-Belmont Forum Project 'Alien Scenarios' (BMBF/PT DLR 01LC1807C). AN and DM acknowledge funding from EXPRO Grant No. 19-28807X (Czech Science Foundation) and long-term research development project RVO 67985939 (The Czech Academy of Sciences). We also thank John Wilson and the two anonymous reviewers for their stimulating and helpful comments.

Subjects
InvaCost, Monetary impact, Non-native insects, Policy, Ecology, [SDE]Environmental Sciences, Exotic mammals, Invasive alien species, Introduction pathways, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Management, [SDV.BV.PEP]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Vegetal Biology/Phytopathology and phytopharmacy
Abstract

Introduction pathways play a pivotal role in the success of Invasive Alien Species (IAS)—the subset of alien species that have a negative environmental and/or socio-economic impact. Pathways refer to the fundamental processes that leads to the introduction of a species from one geographical location to another—marking the beginning of all alien species invasions. Increased knowledge of pathways is essential to help reduce the number of introductions and impacts of IAS and ultimately improve their management. Here we use the InvaCost database, a comprehensive repository on the global monetary impacts of IAS, combined with pathway data classified using the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) hierarchical classification and compiled from CABI Invasive Species Compendium, the Global Invasive Species Database (GISD) and the published literature to address five key points. Data were available for 478 individual IAS. For these, we found that both the total and annual average cost per species introduced through the ‘Stowaway’ (US$144.9bn; US$89.4m) and ‘Contaminant’ pathways (US$99.3bn; US$158.0m) were higher than species introduced primarily through the ‘Escape’ (US$87.4bn; US$25.4m) and ‘Release’ pathways (US$64.2bn; US$16.4m). Second, the recorded costs (both total and average) of species introduced unintentionally was higher than that from species introduced intentionally. Third, insects and mammals, respectively, accounted for the greatest proportion of the total cost of species introduced unintentionally and intentionally respectively, at least of the available records; ‘Stowaway’ had the highest recorded costs in Asia, Central America, North America and Diverse/Unspecified regions. Fourthly, the total cost of a species in a given location is not related to the year of first record of introduction, but time gaps might blur the true pattern. Finally, the total and average cost of IAS were not related to their number of introduction pathways. Although our findings are directly limited by the available data, they provide important material which can contribute to pathway priority measures, notably by complementing studies on pathways associated with ecologically harmful IAS. They also highlight the crucial need to fill the remaining data gaps—something that will be critical in prioritising limited management budgets to combat the current acceleration of species invasions.

Published
2022

3. Managing biological invasions: the cost of inaction

Author

Danish A. Ahmed, Emma J. Hudgins, Ross N. Cuthbert, Melina Kourantidou, Christophe Diagne, Phillip J. Haubrock, Brian Leung, Chunlong Liu, Boris Leroy, Sergei Petrovskii, Ayah Beidas, Franck Courchamp, Gulf University for Science and Technology (GUST), Department of Biology [McGill University], McGill University = Université McGill [Montréal, Canada], Department of Biology, Carleton University (Carleton University), Carleton University, Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research [Kiel] (GEOMAR), Queen's University [Belfast] (QUB), Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI), Hellenic Centre for Marine Research (HCMR), University of Southern Denmark (SDU), Ecologie Systématique et Evolution (ESE), AgroParisTech-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum [Frankfurt], Senckenberg – Leibniz Institution for Biodiversity and Earth System Research - Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung, Leibniz Association-Leibniz Association, South Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses [University of South Bohemia] (CENAKVA), Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters [University of South Bohemia], University of South Bohemia -University of South Bohemia, Freie Universität Berlin, Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (IGB), Berlin-Brandenburg Institute of Advanced Biodiversity Research (BBIB), Institute of Hydrobiology [Wuhan], Chinese Academy of Sciences [Beijing] (CAS), Biologie des Organismes et Ecosystèmes Aquatiques (BOREA), Université de Caen Normandie (UNICAEN), Normandie Université (NU)-Normandie Université (NU)-Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle (MNHN)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université des Antilles (UA), University of Leicester, BNP-Paribas Foundation Climate Initiative for funding the InvaCost project that allowed the construction of the InvaCost database., The present work was conducted following a workshop funded by the AXA Research Fund Chair of Invasion Biology and is part of the AlienScenarios project funded by BiodivERsA and Belmont-Forum call 2018 on biodiversity scenarios. DAA is funded by the Kuwait Foundation for the Advancement of Sciences (KFAS), grant no. PR1914SM-01 and the Gulf University for Science and Technology (GUST) internal seed fund, grant no. 234597. EJH is supported by a Fonds de recherche du Québec-nature et technologies B3X fellowship. RNC acknowledges funding from the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation. CL was sponsored by the PRIME programme of the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) with funds from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)., and ANR-14-CE02-0021,InvaCosts,Insectes envahissants et leurs couts pour la biodiversité, l'économie et la santé humaine(2014)

Subjects
InvaCost, Ecology, [SDE]Environmental Sciences, Long-term management, Socioeconomic impacts, Invasive alien species, 500 Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik::570 Biowissenschaften, Biologie::570 Biowissenschaften, Biologie, Prevention and biosecurity, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Logistic growth
Abstract

Ecological and socioeconomic impacts from biological invasions are rapidly escalating worldwide. While effective management underpins impact mitigation, such actions are often delayed, insufficient or entirely absent. Presently, management delays emanate from a lack of monetary rationale to invest at early invasion stages, which precludes effective prevention and eradication. Here, we provide such rationale by developing a conceptual model to quantify the cost of inaction, i.e., the additional expenditure due to delayed management, under varying time delays and management efficiencies. Further, we apply the model to management and damage cost data from a relatively data-rich genus (Aedes mosquitoes). Our model demonstrates that rapid management interventions following invasion drastically minimise costs. We also identify key points in time that differentiate among scenarios of timely, delayed and severely delayed management intervention. Any management action during the severely delayed phase results in substantial losses $$( > 50\%$$ ( > 50 % of the potential maximum loss). For Aedes spp., we estimate that the existing management delay of 55 years led to an additional total cost of approximately $ 4.57 billion (14% of the maximum cost), compared to a scenario with management action only seven years prior (

Published
2022

4. Association between temporal patterns in helminth assemblages and successful range expansion of exotic Mus musculus domesticus in Senegal

Author

Christophe Diagne, Carine Brouat, Arame Ndiaye, Youssoupha Niang, Mamadou Kane, Caroline Tatard, Laurent Granjon, M. S. Gueye, Centre de Biologie pour la Gestion des Populations (UMR CBGP), Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (Cirad)-Université de Montpellier (UM)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD [France-Sud])-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE)-Institut Agro - Montpellier SupAgro, Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro), Université Cheikh Anta Diop [Dakar, Sénégal] (UCAD), CERISE project (Fonds Francais pour l'Environnement Mondial via the Fondation pour la Recherche sur la Biodiversite) : AAP-SCEN-20B III, French Research Institute for Development (IRD), ANR-11-JSV7-0006,ENEMI,Conséquences évolutives des ennemis naturels dans des invasions biologiques majeures : le rôle des parasites dans le succès de l'invasion de deux rongeurs commensaux(2011), Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (Cirad)-Centre international d'études supérieures en sciences agronomiques (Montpellier SupAgro)-Université de Montpellier (UM)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD [France-Sud])-Institut national d’études supérieures agronomiques de Montpellier (Montpellier SupAgro), and Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE)

Subjects
0106 biological sciences, Mus musculus domesticus, Ecology, biology, Rodent, Host (biology), Range (biology), Enemy release, [SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio], [SDV.BA]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Animal biology, 010604 marine biology & hydrobiology, Parasitism, Zoology, biology.organism_classification, Gastrointestinal helminths, 010603 evolutionary biology, 01 natural sciences, House mouse, biology.animal, Parasite hosting, Helminths, Mastomys erythroleucus, Spill-back, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Abstract

International audience; Relationships between parasitism and invasion success are increasingly evidenced in the literature. However, the dynamic nature of the major parasite-related processes has been rarely taken into account until now, while the residence time of invaders in colonized regions was shown to be associated to crucial changes in parasite communities. Here, we strive to bridge this gap using a temporal survey of rodent populations along one invasion route of the exotic house mouseMus musculus domesticusthat currently invades North Senegal. In this study, we investigated whether gastrointestinal helminth (GIH) assemblages changed over time in native (Mastomys erythroleucus) and/or invasive (M. m. domesticus) rodent populations sampled at an invasion front, and whether these potential changes may be associated to the invasion success of the exotic mouse. Four years separated two rodent sampling campaigns (2013 and 2016/17) in six localities. Despite being relatively short, the timeframe considered here allowed to evidence significant patterns in rodent communities and their GIH assemblages. At the host community level, we showed that the exotic mouse was now established at all sites, becoming the dominant species in sites where it was not recorded before. At the GIH community level, increased infection of the single shared cestode (Mathevotaenia symmetrica) in both rodent species brought support to the "spill-back" hypothesis. Infection levels of GIH that remained low at the invasion front in invading mice over time also supported the "enemy release" hypothesis. Both hypotheses should deserve further experimental work to demonstrate their role in the invasion success of the house mouse in Senegal.

Published
2020

5. Correction to: Managing biological invasions: the cost of inaction

Author

Danish A. Ahmed, Emma J. Hudgins, Ross N. Cuthbert, Melina Kourantidou, Christophe Diagne, Phillip J. Haubrock, Brian Leung, Chunlong Liu, Boris Leroy, Sergei Petrovskii, Ayah Beidas, and Franck Courchamp

Subjects
Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Published
2022

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results