Search

Patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) stenting is an accepted method for securing pulmonary blood flow in cyanotic neonates. In neonates with pulmonary atresia and single source ductal-dependent pulmonary blood flow (SSPBF), PDA stenting remains controversial. We sought to evaluate outcomes in neonates with SSPBF, comparing PDA stenting and surgical Blalock–Taussig shunt (BTS). Neonates with SSPBF who underwent PDA stenting or BTS at the four centers of the Congenital Catheterization Research Collaborative from January 2008 to December 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Reintervention on the BTS or PDA stent prior to planned surgical repair served as the primary endpoint. Additional analyses of peri-procedural complications, interventions, and pulmonary artery growth were performed. A propensity score was utilized to adjust for differences in factors. Thirty-five patients with PDA stents and 156 patients with BTS were included. The cohorts had similar baseline characteristics, procedural complications, and mortality. Interstage reintervention rates were higher in the PDA stent cohort (48.6% vs. 15.4%, p

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) can lead to progressive heart failure with high morbidity and mortality. Cardiac catheterization (CC) is the gold standard for diagnosis and response to vasodilatory medications. The invasive nature of CC and associated anesthesia predispose this patient population to adverse events including death. Catheterization records were queried from 1/1/2011 to 10/31/2016. Patients with PH, defined as pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) greater than 3 WU m2, pulmonary artery pressure above 20 mmHg, and pulmonary wedge pressure less than or equal to 15 mmHg, who underwent hemodynamic CC were included in this retrospective study. Both patients with and without congenital heart disease were included. There were 198 CC in 191 patients. Adverse events (n = 28, 14.1%) included cardiac arrest, increased respiratory support requiring ICU care, PH crisis, bradycardia/hypotension requiring intervention, and arrhythmias. Odds of an adverse event increased by 22% for every 15-min increase in procedure times (OR 1.22, CI 1.01–1.39, p = 0.002) and were significantly increased for procedures longer than 80 min (OR 3.75, CI 1.56–9.00, p = 0.007) (Fig. 1). Patients with an adverse event had higher mean pulmonary artery pressures while breathing oxygen (43 [35–58] versus 34 [27–44] mmHg, p = 0.017) and oxygen with inhaled nitric oxide (37 [32–56] versus 32 [25–40] mmHg, p = 0.026). Females carried more risk than males (OR 3.88, CI 1.44–10.40, p = 0.007). Younger age, medication regimens, prematurity, and genetic disease did not carry an increased risk. Adverse events are common in pediatric patients with PH undergoing CC. The risk of adverse events correlates with greater procedure times and higher mean pulmonary artery pressure. Minimizing procedure time may improve patient outcomes.

Isolated pulmonary artery (PA) of ductal origin (IPADO) is a rare cardiac defect which requires surgical repair, with or without preceding palliation. We sought to determine the impact of treatment strategy on outcomes. Retrospective study of consecutive patients with IPADO that underwent staged or primary repair from 1/05 to 9/16 at 6 Congenital Cardiac Research Collaborative centers. Patients with single ventricle physiology, major aortopulmonary collaterals, or bilateral IPADO were excluded. Primary outcome was isolated PA z-score at late follow-up. Secondary outcomes included PA symmetry index (isolated:confluent PA diameter) and reintervention burden. Propensity score adjustment was used to account for baseline differences. Of 60 patients in the study cohort, 26 (43%) underwent staged and 34 (57%) primary repair. The staged and primary repair groups differed in weight at diagnosis and presence of other heart disease but not in baseline PA dimensions. Staged patients underwent ductal stent (n = 16) or surgical shunt (n = 10) placement followed by repair at 210 vs. 21 days in the primary repair group (p < 0.001). At median follow-up of 4.5 years post-repair, after adjustment, isolated PA z-score (− 0.74 [− 1.75, − 0.26] vs. − 1.95 [− 2.91, − 1.59], p = 0.012) and PA symmetry index (0.81 [0.49, 1.0] vs. 0.55 [0.48, 0.69], p = 0.042) significantly favored the staged repair group. Freedom from PA reintervention was not different between groups (adjusted HR 0.78 [0.41, 1.48]; p = 0.445). A staged approach to repair of IPADO is associated with superior isolated PA size and symmetry at late follow-up. Consideration should be given to initial palliation in IPADO patients, when feasible.

Pulmonary vein stenosis (PVS) is an increasingly recognized disease in infants and young children. Controversy exists regarding the best management of this disease. The hallmarks of PVS include recurrence, upstream progression, and spread to previously unaffected pulmonary veins. This review highlights invasive and medical therapies for pediatric patients with primary and secondary PVS. Catheter-based therapies for PVS are the mainstay of anatomic, large-vessel therapy. Angioplasty and stenting both have a role in the anatomic management of PVS. Repeated transcatheter interventions have been shown to improve survival. Surgical PVS intervention is an important element to PVS therapy. Primary (medical) therapy is increasingly recognized as an important element to PVS treatment. New anti-proliferative therapies have proven to be a useful adjunct to invasive therapies. Congenital and acquired PVS are progressive diseases that pose a growing challenge for cardiologists. Surgical and transcatheter interventions in most cases have early success but are only temporizing solutions in the face of myofibroblastic proliferation. More recent studies focusing on benefits of immunomodulatory therapy have paved the way for the use of primary treatment alongside the anatomic therapy.

Prior to initiation of a formal screening program, 30 % of patients referred for device closure of an atrial septal defect (ASD) at our institution had atrial septal anatomy which precluded ASD device closure. This resulted in inefficiencies in workflow, staff utilization, and inconvenience for families. Our objective was to report our experience with an ASD prescreening evaluation/protocol and family consultation process. This is a retrospective study of pediatric patients who underwent a comprehensive ASD prescreening evaluation at Children's Healthcare of Atlanta between January 2011 and June 2013. The comprehensive prescreening process included a detailed transthoracic echocardiogram and family consultation. Upon establishing a formal prescreening process for patients with secundum ASDs, 138 patients were screened for appropriateness of ASD device closure. At time of prescreening, 40 patients (29 %) were deemed not to be suitable candidates for device ASD closure. In 9 patients (6.5 %), after discussion with the interventionalist, parents elected to pursue surgical ASD closure. A total of 78 patients (56.5 %) underwent successful transcutaneous ASD device closure. In addition, there was a significant discrepancy in the reported size of the ASD between the outside evaluation and the ASD size discovered during the prescreening process. The addition of a prescreening program for transcatheter ASD closure has decreased the incidence of unsuccessful ASD closure from 30 to 10.3 %. The use of a comprehensive evaluation process for ASD device closure improves the likelihood of successful device implantation and permits adequate preprocedural counseling for the patient and family.