Search

Implant malpositioning, joint line (JL) lowering, and malalignment have been identified as risk factors for implant failure in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). The aims of this study were to compare the accuracy of implant positioning in robotic-assisted UKA versus conventional UKA in a large cohort and examine the correlation with implant survival at mid-term follow-up.This retrospective study included 356 medial UKAs from 2011 to 2019. The radiological measurements performed were coronal positioning of tibial implant according to Cartier angle (Δ Cartier), posterior tibial slope (PTS), residual hip-knee-ankle (HKA), and JL restoration. Outliers were defined as follows: post-operative HKA 175° or 180°, Δ Cartier 3° or - 3°, JL change ≥ 2 mm, and PTS 2° or 8°. The survival probability was reported at the last follow-up.Out of the 356 knees included, 159 underwent conventional UKA (44.5%) and 197 (55.5%) robotic-assisted UKA. The mean follow-up was 61.3 months ± 24.0. Robotic UKA was associated with better accuracy compared to conventional UKA in relation to HKA (67% vs 56%, p = 0.023), JL restoration (70% vs 44%, p 0.0001), PTS (83% vs 55%, p 0.0001), and tibial varus restoration (65% vs 55%, p = 0.049). Implant survival in the robotic group was found to be superior at the last follow-up (96.4% versus 87.3% at 9 years, p = 0.004).Robotic assistance in patients undergoing medial UKA was associated with better accuracy compared to conventional UKA with respect to tibial implant positioning, post-operative limb alignment, and JL restoration. This was translated in improved survival at mid-term follow-up favouring the robotic group.

The aim was to investigate the contribution of robotics assisted total hip arthroplasty (THA) through direct anterior approach (DAA) in improving radiographic precision, functional results and complications.This retrospective study compared 100 primary conventional THA (cTHA) to 50 primary robotic THA (rTHA) through DAA. All cups were placed with the objective of having no anterior overhang while respecting the safe zones (SZ). Radiographic analysis included cup inclination and anteversion, vertical and horizontal changes of the rotation centre (ΔVCOR, ΔHCOR), acetabular and femoral offset. SZ were 30-50° of inclination and 10-30° of anteversion. Outliers were defined as medial displacement of the COR 5 mm, vertical displacement of the COR 3 mm superiorly. Harris hip score (HHS) and complications were compared at one year of follow-up.The robotic cups were better oriented with 98% in the global SZ versus 68% in the cTHA group (p = 0.0002). The COR was on average better restored in the robotic group in both the horizontal and vertical planes (Δ HCOR = - 5.0 ± 5.0 vs - 3.4 ± 4.9, p = 0.03; Δ VCOR = 1.6 ± 3.3 vs 0.2 ± 2.7, p = 0.04). There were fewer outliers in the rTHA group concerning VCOR (28% versus 10%, p = 0.03). There was no significant difference in HHS and complication rate at one year.The use of robotics for THA by DAA provided an advantage in controlling the orientation of the cup and the restoration of its rotation centre. Thanks to the 3D planning on CT scan, it allowed to respect the thresholds while avoiding the anterior overhangs.

Purpose To investigate the minimum use that correlates with the best outcomes in term of complications associated with self-directed rehabilitation mobile application and to explore the user profile and usage habits. Methods This was a single-center retrospective study of 356 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction surgery between November 2019 and August 2020. Complications were defined as the presence of an extension deficit ≥ 5° after 6 weeks and/or the presence of cyclops syndrome. The demographics, sports competition level and number of connections were collected by the application. Results The complication rate was reduced 4.2-fold with at least 2 weeks of use (2.4% (3/123) (with 0.8% (1/123) of cyclops syndrome) versus 10.8% (23/212) (with 3.3% (7/212) cyclops syndrome), p = .04). The mean duration of use was 20 ± 23 days with a frequency of 2.1 ± 2.3 connections per day. The usage rate was 50% in week 1, 35% in week 2, and 24% in week 3. There was one peak in the abandon rate during the first few days of use and a second peak at Day 10 when physiotherapy sessions started. There were two dips in the abandon rate associated with the follow-up visits at Days 21 and 45. Greater use was found in older patients (p = .0001) and female patients (p = .04). Conclusions When using the application for a minimum of 2 weeks, the risk of complications was reduced 4.2-fold. The typical users of a self-directed rehabilitation application after ACL surgery in this study were women and patients over 30 years of age. Level of evidence IV, retrospective.

There are increased surgical considerations when revising total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in active patients. Few studies have assessed if a semi-constrained [Total Stabilized (TS)] prostheses has similar knee biomechanics to a primary posterior stabilized (PS) prosthesis. The aim was to compare the gait parameters in patients with PS or TS TKA and normal controls. 32 patients with TKA were prospectively included with either a primary PS (n = 15) or a revision TS (n = 17) prosthesis. Gait analysis was performed at 6 months postoperatively for each patient, with an optoelectronic knee assessment device (KneeKG®) assessing the displacement of the tibia relative to the femur during the different gait phases (flexion/extension, anterior/posterior translation, adduction/abduction, internal/external rotation). A control group (n = 12) of healthy knees was compared with the TKA groups. There were no significant kinematic differences between PS and TS groups. The maximum knee flexion during gait was 53° ± 8.1° in the PS group vs 52° ± 8.7° in the TS group. The antero-posterior translation was similar in both group (2.3 ± 0.5 mm vs 2.6 ± 0.9 mm, respectively). Peak varus angle during loading and swing phase was slightly higher in the TS group (2.7° ± 0.7° and 5.2° ± 0.9°) than in the PS group (2.9° ± 0.6° and 5.6° ± 1.2°), without significant difference. The ranges in internal/external rotation were similar between PS and TS TKA (3.7° ± 0.5° vs 3.3° ± 0.6°, respectively). Both designs approached closely the normal gait patterns of the control group except in the frontal plane. Single radius TS TKA has gait parameters similar to single radius PS TKA. Use of a single radius TS TKA in revision TKA is not detrimental to a patient’s gait pattern. Both designs approached closely the normal gait patterns of the control group. Prospective, case–control study; Level III.

Greater trochanter (GT) fractures affect 0.6–29% of patients after direct anterior approach (DAA) total hip arthroplasty (THA). Given the growing popularity of this approach, this study aimed to assess the evolution of the GT fractures during the learning curve, their risk factors and their consequences. 537 total hip arthroplasties were retrospectively included from May 2013 to December 2017 in a single academic centre. Patient characteristics, perioperative management, clinical consequences and postoperative radiographs were analysed. GT fractures represented 2.4% (n = 13) of the THA, and there was not a decrease with experience. The GT fracture patients did not require any additional support during the surgery, and full weight bearing was always allowed without any restriction. This complication only happened in females, with the risk significantly increased in those > 70 years old (OR = 4.9). There was no specific consequence during the follow-up, mean HHS score was 98.5 and all of the patients were satisfied or very satisfied postoperatively. Older osteoporotic women are known to be at risk for GT fracture during DAA THA. Those results reinforce the argument in favour of proper patient selection in DAA to lower the complications since it does not improve with surgeon’s experience. Retrospective, consecutive case series; Level IV.

PURPOSE: Cup positioning is important for optimum hip stability, avoiding component impingement and decreasing both bearing surface wear and revision rate. Transitioning from posterior approach in a lateral position to direct anterior approach (DAA) in a supine presents unique challenges for surgeons. The aim of this study was to examine the learning curve when using standard instrumentation that was not specific to DAA. METHODS: A consecutive retrospective series of 537 total hip arthroplasty by DAA from May 2013 to December 2017. Cup positioning was analysed on radiographs and classified whether inside or outside two safe zones (inclination 30-50° and anteversion 10-30°). The demographic data (age, BMI, gender, neck shaft angle (NSA)), surgeon's dominant side and experience were assessed as risk factors. RESULTS: Eighty per cent of cups (n=426) were in the combined safe zones. Eighty-eight per cent (n=470) were in appropriate anteversion and 87% (n=463) abduction. Two factors that were significant were identified: Cups of left hips operated by right-handed surgeons were more anteverted (OR=4.06) and more vertical (OR=2.23); females had a higher anteversion of the cup (OR=2.42). Obesity, age and NSA were not risk factors for cup malposition. There was a spike of cups too horizontal at the beginning of the experience (OR=3.86), and no learning curve was observed in the other orientations. CONCLUSION: With our DAA technique using standard instrumentation, there were no risk factors linked to the patient identified for cup malposition. DAA-specific instrumentation is not required to achieve optimum positioning of the cup. Surgeon has to be aware of an excess of abduction at the beginning of his experience and an excess of anteversion and adduction when performing THA on the opposite side of his dominant hand.