Search

Background This article is a duplicated publication from the Japanese version of “2019 JSDT Guidelines for Peritoneal Dialysis” with permission from the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy (JSDT). This clinical practice guideline (CPG) was developed primarily by the Working Group on Revision of Peritoneal Dialysis (PD) Guidelines of the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy. Recently, the definition and creation process for CPGs have become far more rigorous; traditional methods and formats no longer adhere to current standards. To improve the reliability of international transmission of our findings, CPGs are created in compliance with the methodologies developed by the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) working group. Part 2 of this PD guideline is the first CPG developed by our society that conforms to the GRADE approach. Methods Detailed processes were created in accordance with the Cochrane handbook and the GRADE approach developed by the GRADE working group. Results Clinical question (CQ)1: Is the use of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RAS inhibitors), such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), effective in PD patients? Recommendation: We suggest the usage of RAS inhibitors (ACEI and ARB) in PD patients (GRADE 2C). CQ2: Icodextrin or glucose solution: which is more useful as a dialysate among patients with PD? Recommendation: We suggest using icodextrin when managing body fluids in PD patients (GRADE 2C). CQ3: Is it better to apply or not apply mupirocin/gentamicin ointment to the exit site? Recommendation: We suggest not applying mupirocin/gentamicin ointment to the exit sites of PD patients (GRADE 2C). CQ4: Which surgical approach is more desirable when a PD catheter is placed, open surgery or laparoscopic surgery? No recommendation. CQ5: Which administration route of antibiotics is better in PD patients with peritonitis, intravenous or intraperitoneal? Recommendation: We suggest intraperitoneal administration of antibiotics in PD patients with peritonitis (GRADE 2C). Note: The National Insurance does not currently cover intraperitoneal administration. CQ6: Is peritoneal dialysis or hemodialysis better as the first renal replacement therapy in diabetic patients? No recommendation. Conclusions In the future, we suggest that society members construct their own evidence to answer CQs not brought up in this guideline, and thereby show the achievements of Japan worldwide.

Success in peritoneal dialysis (PD) requires a well-functioning catheter, and catheter placement at PD initiation is extremely important for long-term PD. Although several randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) have compared open surgery with laparoscopic surgery, there is controversy regarding which surgical approach is desirable. The present systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to clarify which surgical approach is superior. A systematic literature search for RCTs was performed using the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and the MEDLINE database, and a meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager Version 5.3.5 (Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK). Catheter survival was the primary outcome, and leakage, hernia, requirement for reoperation, catheter-related infection, postoperative pain, hospitalization period associated with catheter placement, and catheter migration were the secondary outcomes. After screening 913 references, seven RCTs were analyzed. Laparoscopic surgery was found to have no favorable effect on catheter survival (5 trials, 424 patients; risk ratio [RR] 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.92–1.13; p = 0.68; low-quality evidence]. The incidence of catheter migration was significantly lower with laparoscopic surgery (6 trials, 526 patients; RR 0.42; 95% CI 0.18–0.96; p = 0.04; moderate-quality evidence). However, the significance decreased on limiting the analysis to RCTs involving laparoscopic surgery without secured suture of the PD catheter (4 trials, 431 patients; RR 0.58; 95% CI 0.27–1.25; p = 0.17; moderate-quality evidence). Other outcomes were similar between open surgery and laparoscopic surgery. The present findings indicate that laparoscopic surgery has a limited advantage over open surgery with respect to PD patients’ outcomes.

In 2011, the Japanese Society of Nephrology (JSN) published new clinical guidelines for IgA nephropathy (IgAN) with a new risk stratification based on clinical and histological severity. For classification, patients are divided into four groups (low, medium, high, and very high risk). However, differences in responsiveness to each treatment among different groups remain unclear. We evaluate the responsiveness of tonsillectomy plus steroid pulse (TSP) therapy using the new risk stratification. We retrospectively reviewed 111 IgAN patients with TSP therapy between January 2003 and January 2013. Study patients were divided into three groups [low- (n = 40), medium- (n = 43) and high-/very high-risk group (n = 28)]. The primary outcome was clinical remission (CR). The observation period was 1 year following tonsillectomy. 57 out of 111 patients (51.4 %) reached CR. The CR incidence was 70.0, 41.9 and 39.3 % (the low-, the medium- and the high-/very high-risk group, respectively). The incidence of CR was significantly higher in the low-risk group (P = 0.013). In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, both the medium- and the high-/very high-risk group showed significantly lower incidence of inducing CR than the low-risk group [(odds ratio 0.324; 95 % confidence interval 0.106–0.939, P = 0.041) (odds ratio 0.239; 95 % confidence interval 0.058–0.910, P = 0.040), respectively]. The new risk stratification in the 2011 JSN clinical guidelines for IgAN had a positive impact on early CR of TSP therapy.

A 42-year-old female end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patient with reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome (RPLS) post-transfusion during initiation of hemodialysis is reported. Eleven days after the onset of illness, we diagnosed encephalopathy as a grand mal seizure resulting from diffuse cerebral edema. One reason for the delayed diagnosis was that her symptom, a throbbing headache that occurred during her first dialysis, indicated dialysis disequilibrium syndrome. We must bear in mind that a small amount of transfusion could cause RPLS even during the first dialysis. To our knowledge, this is the first case report on RPLS after blood transfusion in an ESRD patient.