1. Motion correction of free-breathing magnetic resonance renography using model-driven registration
- Author
-
Philip A. Kalra, Jehill D Parikh, Constantina Chrysochou, David L. Buckley, Dimitra Flouri, Neil S. Sheerin, Steven Sourbron, Daniel Lesnic, and Peter E. Thelwall
- Subjects
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy ,Computer science ,Biophysics ,Image registration ,Quantitative imaging ,Model-driven registration ,030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging ,Motion ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Free-form deformation ,Humans ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Parametric statistics ,Ground truth ,Radiological and Ultrasound Technology ,business.industry ,Respiration ,Dynamic data ,Pattern recognition ,Magnetic Resonance Imaging ,Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI ,Hausdorff distance ,Motion correction ,Artificial intelligence ,Magnetic resonance renography ,business ,Gradient descent ,Radioisotope Renography ,Algorithms ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery ,Research Article - Abstract
Introduction Model-driven registration (MDR) is a general approach to remove patient motion in quantitative imaging. In this study, we investigate whether MDR can effectively correct the motion in free-breathing MR renography (MRR). Materials and methods MDR was generalised to linear tracer-kinetic models and implemented using 2D or 3D free-form deformations (FFD) with multi-resolution and gradient descent optimization. MDR was evaluated using a kidney-mimicking digital reference object (DRO) and free-breathing patient data acquired at high temporal resolution in multi-slice 2D (5 patients) and 3D acquisitions (8 patients). Registration accuracy was assessed using comparison to ground truth DRO, calculating the Hausdorff distance (HD) between ground truth masks with segmentations and visual evaluation of dynamic images, signal-time courses and parametric maps (all data). Results DRO data showed that the bias and precision of parameter maps after MDR are indistinguishable from motion-free data. MDR led to reduction in HD (HDunregistered = 9.98 ± 9.76, HDregistered = 1.63 ± 0.49). Visual inspection showed that MDR effectively removed motion effects in the dynamic data, leading to a clear improvement in anatomical delineation on parametric maps and a reduction in motion-induced oscillations on signal-time courses. Discussion MDR provides effective motion correction of MRR in synthetic and patient data. Future work is needed to compare the performance against other more established methods.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF