Search

Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) do not reduce the risk of initial or recurrent myocardial infarction (MI) in patients diagnosed with stable coronary artery disease (CAD). The aim of this current study was to evaluate the association between CCBs and aspirin resistance in patients with CAD. Patients with stable CAD who were regularly taking aspirin (75–100 mg qd) for at least 1 month prior to enrollment in the study were included. The VerifyNow system was used for platelet function testing with high on-aspirin platelet reactivity (HAPR) defined as aspirin reaction units (ARU) >550. We compared patients treated with CCBs versus control group. Five hundred three patients with CAD were included in this study, and 88 were treated with CCBs. Mean age (67.9±9.7 in the CCB group vs. 66.5±11.4 in the control group), gender (77.3 male vs. 82.9%), rates of diabetes mellitus (34.7 vs. 36.9%), rates of CKD (23.5 vs. 23.5%), dyslipidemia (85.1 vs. 85.3%), and statin therapy (89.5 vs. 90.7%) were similar. The mean ARU was 465.4±70.0 for patients treated with CCBs versus 445.2±60.0 in controls (p=0.006). Similarly, 15.9% of CCB patients demonstrated HAPR compared to 7.0% (p=0.006). The administration of CCBs was independently associated with HAPR in a multivariate analysis (OR 1.72, 95% CI: 1.04–8.91, p=0.047) as well as in propensity score matched analysis (OR 1.56; CI: 1.22–1.93; p

Coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) is associated with a high incidence of venous and arterial thromboembolic events. Currently, there are no clinical or laboratory markers that predict thrombotic risk. Circulating immature platelets are hyper-reactive platelets, which are associated with arterial thrombotic events. The aim of this study was to assess whether the proportion of circulating immature platelets is associated with disease severity in Covid-19 patients. Patients admitted with Covid-19 disease were prospectively assessed. Immature platelet count (IPC) and immature platelet fraction (IPF) were measured at admission and at additional time points during the hospital course using the Sysmex XN-3000 auto-analyzer. A total of 136 consecutive patients with Covid-19 were recruited [mean age 60 ± 19 years, 49% woman, 56 (41%) had mild-moderate disease and 80 (59%) had severe disease at presentation]. The median IPF% was higher in patients with severe compared to mild-moderate disease [5.8 (3.9–8.7) vs. 4.2 (2.73–6.45), respectively, p = 0.01]. The maximal IPC value was also higher in patients with severe disease [15 (10.03–21.56), vs 10.9 (IQR 6.79–15.62), respectively, p = 0.001]. Increased IPC was associated with increased length of hospital stay. Patients with severe Covid-19 have higher levels of IPF than patients with mild-moderate disease. IPF may serve as a prognostic marker for disease severity in Covid-19 patients.

Multi-vessel coronary artery disease (MV-CAD) is correlated with worse clinical outcomes compared with single-vessel CAD (SV-CAD). The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between MV-CAD and high on-aspirin platelet reactivity (HAPR) in patients with stable CAD treated with aspirin.The current study is an analysis of prospectively enrolled randomly selected patients with known stable CAD, who were taking aspirin (75-100 mg qd) regularly for at least one month, and had undergone coronary angiography at least 3 months prior to the enrollment to the study.acute coronary syndrome at the time of platelet function testing, active malignancy, acute infection, active inflammatory/rheumatic disease, major surgery in the past 6 months, chronic liver failure, treatment with oral anticoagulation, non-adherence with Aspirin and thrombocytopenia (100 K/micl). Blood was drawn from the participants and sent for platelet function testing (VerifyNow, Instrumentation Laboratory Company, Bedford, Massachusetts, United States). MV-CAD was defined as50% stenosis in ≥2 separate major coronary territories per coronary angiography. HAPR was defined as aspirin reaction units (ARU)550.Overall, 507 patients were analyzed; age 66.7 ± 11.2, 17.9% women, 223 (44%) had MV-CAD. The rate of HAPR was significantly higher among patients with MV-CAD vs. SV-CAD (14.8% vs. 3.5%, p 0.001, respectively). Furthermore, a "dose response"-like association was found between the number of stenotic coronary arteries and the rate of HAPR (3.5%, 13.5 and 17.3% for SV-CAD, 2-vessel and 3-vessel disease, respectively). In a multivariate analysis adjusted for potential confounders, MV-CAD was found to be a strong independent predictor of HAPR [OR = 1.8 (95%CI: 1.05-4.7), p = 0.014].A significant association between MV-CAD and HAPR was found. Additional studies designed to investigate the mechanisms of HAPR and different therapeutic options for this subset of patients are warranted.

Circulating endothelial progenitor cells (cEPCs) are vital to vascular repair by re-endothelialization. We aimed to explore the effect of proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) on cEPCs hypothesizing a possible pleiotropic effect. Patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) were sampled for cEPCs at baseline and following the initiation of PCSK9i. cEPCs were assessed using flow cytometry by the expression of CD34(+)/CD133(+) and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-2(+), and by the formation of colony-forming units (CFUs) and production of VEGF. Our cohort included 26 patients (median age 68 (IQR 63, 73) years; 69% male). Following 3 months of treatment with PCSK9i and a decline in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (153 (IQR 116, 176) to 56 (IQR 28, 72) mg/dl), p

To assess the effect of cessation of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) regimens containing 2nd generation P2Y12 inhibitors on platelet reactivity, in patients who completed 12 months of DAPT following an acute myocardial infarction. Clinical data has shown an increased cardiovascular risk in the 90 days following cessation of DAPT. One possible explanation is a transient platelet hyper-reactivity after cessation of treatment. Data from patients treated with 2nd generation P2Y12 inhibitors is scarce. Patients who completed 12 month DAPT with prasugrel/ticagrelor underwent serial assessment of platelet reactivity (on DAPT and 1, 4 and 12 weeks post cessation). The primary outcome was platelet reactivity, expressed as platelet reactivity units (PRU) at each time point. 41 participants were included in this study, (23 ticagrelor, 18 prasugrel). There was no statistically significant differences in baseline characteristics between prasugrel/ticagrelor treated patients . The pattern of platelet reactivity recovery after DAPT cessation differed between the ticagrelor and prasugrel: with ticagrelor, after the initial PRU increase from baseline, the PRU remained stable, while with prasugrel, there was a further increase in PRU between 1 and 4 weeks, with a return to the 1 week level by 12 weeks (p = 0.034 for the time × treatment interaction between ticagrelor and prasugrel). Our results suggest there is a transient platelet hyper-reactivity after cessation of ADP receptor blockers therapy with prasugrel, but not ticagrelor. Further research is required to elucidate the pathophysiologic mechanisms behind these findings and to evaluate potential strategies to prevent or overcome this “rebound” effect.

The new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) reduce stroke and systemic embolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF), but dabigatran may increase risk of coronary ischemic events for unclear reasons. Thus, this study assessed the effects of dabigatran and rivaroxaban on platelet reactivity and inflammatory markers in patients with non-valvular AF. Patients with non-valvular AF planned to begin treatment with NOACs were included. Seventeen patients were prescribed dabigatran and ten rivaroxaban. Platelet function (as assessed by multiple-electrode aggregometry, Impact-R shear-induced platelet deposition, P-selectin expression and plasma RANTES levels) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) were measured at enrollment (prior to initiation of NOAC treatment) and at least 7 days into treatment with either dabigratran or rivaroxaban. Seventeen patients treated with dabigatran (mean age 69 ± 7 years, 35 % women, mean CHADS2 score 2.6 ± 1.2), and ten patients treated with rivaroxaban (mean age 73 ± 9 years, 20 % women, mean CHADS2 score 2.7 ± 1.6) completed the study. In both groups, there were no significant differences in platelet reactivity between the baseline and on-anticoagulant treatment time-points, as measured by each of the platelet-specific assays. There was a trend towards increased platelet reactivity in response to arachidonic acid from baseline to on-treatment in both groups, probably as a result of aspirin discontinuation in 33 % of patients. No significant differences were noted between baseline and on-treatment in hs-CRP in both anticoagulant groups. Treatment with dabigatran and rivaroxaban does not appear to be associated with changes in markers of platelet reactivity or systemic inflammation.

Antiplatelet responses to clopidogrel and prasugrel are highly variable and subject to significant rates of high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The proportion of circulating young reticulated platelets (RPs) inversely correlates with responsiveness to both agents. We aimed to determine the relationship between RPs and on-treatment platelet reactivity in ticagrelor-treated patients. Patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) treated with PCI and ticagrelor were tested for platelet reactivity using the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay and multiplate aggregometry. RPs levels were determined using flow cytometry with thiazole orange staining. Tests were performed at 2–4 and 30 days post-PCI. Fifty three patients were included (mean age 62.6 ± 9.8 years, 18.9 % women, 35.8 % diabetes), of which 41 patients (77 %) completed follow-up. Variability in response to ticagrelor was very low according to both assays with no identified cases of HTPR at either time-point. In addition, there were no differences in platelet reactivity, as analyzed by the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay, or in the proportion of RPs between the two time points (p > 0.5). With the multiplate assay, platelet reactivity increased between the two time-points (8.6 ± 6.0 vs. 15.5 ± 11 AU*min; p = 0.0007). There was no significant correlation between RPs and platelet reactivity at both time-points and using both assays (p > 0.5). There were no cases of HTPR up to 30-days post-PCI in patients with NSTE-ACS treated with ticagrelor. In this cohort, no correlation between % RPs and platelet reactivity was observed. Attenuation of RP-induced platelet reactivity as a novel mechanism for ticagrelor’s benefit requires further investigation.

Mean platelet volume (MPV) is a value that is available from standard blood count. Increased MPV is associated with increased platelet reactivity and it has been correlated with adverse cardiac outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). However, there is limited information about the prognostic value of baseline MPV in a large heterogenous patient population which undergoes percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). To examine whether baseline MPV is predictive of clinical outcomes in patients who undergo PCI. Included were consecutive patients who underwent PCI during 2004–2010 (n = 7,585, mean age 67.7 ± 12.1 years, 76.0 % males) with a median follow-up period of 4 years. Baseline MPV before angiography and long-term clinical outcomes were assessed. The mean MPV was higher in women as compared to men (8.6 ± 1.2 vs. 8.5 ± 1.1 fL, p = 0.02), in diabetic versus non-diabetic patients (8.6 ± 1.2 vs. 8.4 ± 1.1 fL, p

The interaction of platelets with the polymeric surface of drug eluting stents has not been fully described in the literature. Our aim was to analyze the patterns of activation and deposition of platelets exposed to two different stent platforms; (a) the polymeric surface of the paclitaxel eluting stent (Taxus® stent, PES,) and (b) the metallic surface of a stent with identical structural design (Express® stent, BMS). Platelet activation was tested by deploying stents in an in vitro flow chamber model. Anticoagulated blood of 25 healthy volunteers was circulated (flow rate 10 ml/min for 60 min) into the flow chamber system. P-selectin expression, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa activation (PAC-1 binding) and platelet-monocyte complexes (PMC) formation were evaluated at 0, 10, 30 and 60 min. Surface platelet deposition was assessed by surface electron microscopy in stents implanted in the in vitro system for 60 min and in stents implanted in normal porcine coronary arteries for 24 h. Platelet activation evaluation showed a higher P-Selectin expression (92.9% of baseline in PES versus 68.3 % in BMS, P = 0.01) and higher PMC formation (125.7 % of baseline in PES versus 75.6% in BMS, P

The mechanism of ultrasound augmentation of pharmacological thrombolysis is yet unknown. The goal of this study is to find the best timing regimen for in-vitro ultrasound augmented clot dissolution by streptokinase, heparin and their combination. Blood clots from 4 donors were cut into 200-400 mg sections and randomized to no treatment with ultrasound; pre-treatment with ultrasound (before immersion); early treatment with ultrasound; or late treatment with ultrasound. Clots were placed in tubes containing either saline; heparin; streptokinase or streptokinase +heparin. All groups showed significant weight reduction (p < 0.001). Using the one way ANOVA test, we showed that ultrasound application resulted in a significantly higher rate of clots dissolution (p < 0.05) than without ultrasound in all of the solutions tested. We found no statistically significant difference between the three ultrasound regimens tested. In conclusion, in our in-vitro model, no single ultrasound timing schedule was found to provide better clot dissolution than the other schedules. This finding may suggest an additive effect between the ultrasound and the different solutions rather than a synergistic effect.

Pharmacotherapies with agents that inhibit platelet function have proven to be effective in the treatment of acute coronary syndromes, and in the prevention of complications during and after percutaneous coronary intervention. Because of multiple synergetic pathways of platelet activation and their close interplay with coagulation, current treatment strategies are based not only on platelet inhibition, but also on the attenuation of procoagulant activity, inhibition of thrombin generation, and enhancement of clot dissolution. Current strategies can be broadly categorized as anticoagulants, antiplatelet agents, and fibrinolytics. This review focuses on the pharmacology of current antiplatelet therapy primarily targeting the inhibition of the enzyme cyclooxygenase 1, the P2Y12 receptor, the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor, and protease-activated receptor 1.