1. For avid glucose tumors, the SUV peak is the most reliable parameter for [18F]FDG-PET/CT quantification, regardless of acquisition time
- Author
-
L. Vervueren, Avigaelle Sher, Djamel Dabli, Pacôme Fosse, Francis Bouchet, Franck Lacoeuille, Aurélie Cahouet-Vannier, and Olivier Couturier
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Volume of interest ,business.industry ,computer.software_genre ,List mode ,030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging ,Acquisition time ,18f fdg uptake ,[18F]FDG uptake ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Voxel ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,medicine ,SUVpeak ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Fdg pet ct ,Radiology ,Nuclear medicine ,business ,computer ,Cardiac imaging ,Original Research - Abstract
Background This study is an assessment of the impact of acquisition times on SUV with [18F]FDG-PET/CT on healthy livers (reference organ with stable uptake over time) and on tumors. Methods One hundred six [18F]FDG-PET/CT were acquired in list mode over a single-bed position (livers (n = 48) or on tumors (n = 58)). Six independent datasets of different durations were reconstructed (from 1.5 to 10 min). SUVmax (hottest voxel), SUVpeak (maximum average SUV within a 1-cm3 spherical volume), and SUVaverage were measured within a 3-cm-diameter volume of interest (VOI) in the right lobe of the liver. For [18F]FDG avid tumors (SUVmax ≥ 5), the SUVmax, SUVpeak, and SUV41% (isocontour threshold method) were computed. Results For tumors, SUVpeak values did not vary with acquisition time. SUVmax displayed significant differences between 1.5- and 5–10-min reconstruction times. SUV41% was the most time-dependent parameter. For the liver, the SUVaverage was the sole parameter that did not vary over time. Conclusions For [18F]FDG avid tumors, with short acquisition times, i.e., with new generations of PET systems, the SUVpeak may be more robust than the SUVmax. The SUVaverage over a 3-cm-diameter VOI in the right lobe of the liver appears to be a good method for a robust and reproducible assessment of the hepatic metabolism.
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF