1. Comparison of automated protocol-based versus non-protocol-based physician-directed weaning from mechanical ventilation
- Author
-
C. Stahl, Andreas Ziegler, G. Dahmen, and E. Muhl
- Subjects
Mechanical ventilation ,Protocol (science) ,business.industry ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Pressure support ventilation ,Workload ,Emergency Nursing ,Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine ,Sample size determination ,Intensive care ,Anesthesia ,Emergency Medicine ,medicine ,Clinical endpoint ,Weaning ,business - Abstract
In the weaning of patients from mechanical ventilation by gradually reducing pressure support ventilation (PSV), an automated computerized system recently proved to be superior to traditional physician-directed weaning. The aim of this study was to replicate these findings when weaning a broad surgical intensive care unit (ICU) patient population off the ventilator. Sixty patients requiring mechanical ventilation over 24 h were randomized to either automated (n = 30) or physician-directed (n = 30) weaning. The primary endpoint was duration of weaning. Secondary endpoints were duration of mechanical ventilation, length of ICU stay, reintubation rates, and workload for staff. Weaning duration did not differ significantly between the computer-driven group and the physician-directed group (0.64 vs. 2.33 d, 95%CI: -0.10 to 2.15, p = 0.167). No significant differences were detected for any secondary endpoint except the workload for PSV settings, which was lower in the computer-driven weaning group (0.0 vs. 0.15 settings/h, p
- Published
- 2009
- Full Text
- View/download PDF