1. Untangling the relationship between fat distribution, nutritional status and Parkinson’s disease severity
- Author
-
Diego Ricciardi, Roberto Bernabei, Davide L. Vetrano, Maria Rita Lo Monaco, Giulia Grande, Domenico Fusco, Anna Rita Bentivoglio, Graziano Onder, Giuseppe Zuccalà, Vincenzo Brandi, Alice Laudisio, and Maria Stella Pisciotta
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,Aging ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Parkinson's disease ,Nutritional Status ,Disease ,Body composition ,Severity of Illness Index ,03 medical and health sciences ,Absorptiometry, Photon ,0302 clinical medicine ,Pharmacotherapy ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Geriatric Assessment ,Adiposity ,Aged ,DXA ,Geriatrics ,business.industry ,Parkinson Disease ,Nutritional status ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Malnutrition ,Cross-Sectional Studies ,Fat ,Parkinson’s disease ,Linear Models ,Original Article ,Female ,Android fat distribution ,Geriatrics and Gerontology ,business ,Body mass index ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery - Abstract
Background Parkinson’s disease (PD) is responsible for significant changes in body composition. Aims We aimed to test the association between PD severity and fat distribution patterns, and to investigate the potential modifier effect of nutritional status in this association. Methods We enrolled 195 PD subjects consecutively admitted to a university geriatric day hospital. All participants underwent comprehensive clinical evaluation, including assessment of total and regional body composition (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, DXA), body mass index, nutritional status (Mini-Nutritional Assessment, MNA), motor disease severity (UPDRS III), comorbidities, and pharmacotherapy. Results The fully adjusted linear regression model showed a negative association between UPDRS III and total body fat in kg and percentage (respectively, B − 0.79; 95% CI − 1.54 to − 0.05 and B − 0.55; 95% CI − 1.04 to − 0.05), percentage android fat (B − 1.07; 95% CI − 1.75 to − 0.39), trunk–leg fat ratio (B − 0.02; 95% CI − 0.04 to − 0.01), trunk–limb fat ratio (B − 0.01; 95% CI − 0.06 to − 0.01) and android–gynoid fat ratio (B − 0.01; 95% CI − 0.03 to − 0.01). After stratification by MNA score, all the parameters of android-like fat distribution resulted negatively associated (p
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF