1. Left thoracotomy vs full sternotomy for centrifugal durable LVAD implantation: 1-year outcome comparison post-LVAD and post-heart transplantation
- Author
-
David DeNofrio, Bowei Deng, Frederick Y. Chen, Amanda R. Vest, Camille E Hironaka, Gregory S. Couper, Masashi Kawabori, Y. Zhan, Michael S. Kiernan, and Andre C. Critsinelis
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,medicine.medical_treatment ,0206 medical engineering ,Biomedical Engineering ,Medicine (miscellaneous) ,02 engineering and technology ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,Biomaterials ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,medicine ,Thoracotomy ,Heart transplantation ,business.industry ,Retrospective cohort study ,equipment and supplies ,medicine.disease ,020601 biomedical engineering ,Cardiac surgery ,Surgery ,Median sternotomy ,Ventricular assist device ,Heart failure ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,Complication ,business - Abstract
Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantations have traditionally been approached through a full median sternotomy (FS). Recently, a minimally invasive left thoracotomy (LT) approach has been popularized. This study sought to compare the outcomes of FS and LT patients post-primary LVAD implantation and post-subsequent heart transplant (HT). This was a single-center retrospective study. 83 patients who underwent primary centrifugal durable LVAD implantation from January 2014 to June 2018 were included (FS, n = 41; LT, n = 42). 41 patients had a subsequent HT (FS, n = 19; LT, n = 22). Pre-operative patient demographics, intraoperative variables, post-operative 1-year survival, length of hospital stay, complications, and outcomes for LVAD implantation and following HT were analyzed. Intraoperative data showed that the LT group had a 23.4% longer mean LVAD implant surgical time (p
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF