1. A CO2 removal system using extracorporeal lung and renal assist device with an acid and alkaline infusion
- Author
-
Nozomi Takahashi, Taka-aki Nakada, Toshikazu Sakai, Osamu Nishida, Kazuhiro Moriyama, Yu Kato, and Shigeto Oda
- Subjects
Respiratory rate ,medicine.medical_treatment ,0206 medical engineering ,Biomedical Engineering ,Medicine (miscellaneous) ,02 engineering and technology ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,Lung injury ,Extracorporeal ,pCO2 ,Biomaterials ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Medicine ,Mechanical ventilation ,Lung ,business.industry ,respiratory system ,020601 biomedical engineering ,respiratory tract diseases ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Anesthesia ,Base excess ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business ,Respiratory minute volume - Abstract
The patients with respiratory failure need high tidal volume by mechanical ventilation, which lead to the ventilator-induced lung injury. We developed an extracorporeal lung and renal assist device (ELRAD), comprising acid infusion, membrane lung, continuous hemodiafiltration and alkaline infusion. To evaluate this system, we conducted in vivo studies using experimental swine which were connected to the new system. In vivo experiments consist of four protocols; baseline = hemodiafiltration only (no O2 gas flow to membrane lung); membrane lung = “Baseline” plus O2 gas flow to membrane lung; “Acid infusion” = “Membrane lung” plus continuous acid infusion; ELRAD = “Acid infusion” plus continuous alkaline infusion. We changed the ventilatory rate of the mechanical ventilation to maintain PCO2 at 50–55 mmHg during the four protocols. The results showed that there was statistically no significant difference in the levels of pH, HCO3−, and base excess when each study protocol was initiated. The amount of CO2 eliminated by the membrane lung significantly increased by 1.6 times in the acid infusion protocol and the ELRAD protocol compared to the conventional membrane lung protocol. Minute ventilation in the ELRAD protocol significantly decreased by 0.5 times compared with the hemodiafiltration only protocol (P
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF