1. Embolisation of pulmonary arteriovenous malformations using high-frequency jet ventilation: benefits of minimising respiratory motion
- Author
-
Marc Lopez, Pierre De Marini, Thi Mai Bernmann, Emanuele Boatta, Afshin Gangi, Bob Heger, Mathieu Canuet, Julien Garnon, Nitin Ramamurthy, Roberto Luigi Cazzato, and Christine Jahn
- Subjects
lcsh:Medical physics. Medical radiology. Nuclear medicine ,Adult ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,lcsh:R895-920 ,Group B ,030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging ,Arteriovenous Malformations ,High-Frequency Jet Ventilation ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Anesthesiology ,Statistical significance ,Humans ,Medicine ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Lung ,Retrospective Studies ,Neuroradiology ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Respiration ,Ultrasound ,Interventional radiology ,Middle Aged ,Embolization, Therapeutic ,Embolisation (therapeutic) ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Anesthesia ,Female ,Original Article ,Diaphragmatic excursion ,business ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery - Abstract
Background To evaluate patient radiation dose and procedural duration recorded during pulmonary arteriovenous malformation (PAVM) embolisation performed using high-frequency jet ventilation (HFJV) as compared with conventional intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV) Methods Patients undergoing PAVM embolisation with HFJV assistance after April 2017 were retrospectively identified as group A, and those treated with IPPV before April 2017 as group B. Primary outcomes were patient radiation dose and procedural duration between groups A and B. Secondary outcomes were difference in diaphragmatic excursion between groups A and B, in group A with/without HFJ assistance, technical/clinical success, and complications. Results Twelve PAVMs were embolised in 5 patients from group A, and 15 PAVMs in 10 patients from group B. Mean patient radiation was significantly lower in group A than in group B (54,307 ± 33,823 mGy cm2 [mean ± standard deviation] versus 100,704 ± 43,930 mGy cm2; p = 0.022). Procedural duration was 33.4 ± 16.1 min in group A versus 57.4 ± 14.9 min in group B (p = 0.062). Diaphragmatic excursion was significantly lower in group A (1.3 ± 0.4 mm) than in group B (19.7 ± 5.2 mm; p
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF