Search

The estuarine maximum turbidity zone (MTZ) can be assumed to be a stressful environment featuring special conditions of great biological importance with an excess of organic matter, high-deposition rates, large variations in salinity, and dredging activities. Under such harsh conditions, populations may remain below the carrying capacity and competition is assumed to be of little importance, as predicted by the stress-gradient hypothesis. Therefore, we hypothesized that invertebrates of similar feeding types may utilize the same resources. To test our hypothesis, we chose the three most abundant taxa classified in literature as deposit feeders (Bathyporeia pilosa, Boccardiella ligerica, Marenzelleria sp.) and two taxa classified as predominately predacious (Palaemon longirostris, Crangon crangon) and determined their isotopic niches based on a stable isotope analysis for the MTZ of the Elbe Estuary (Germany). We expected the isotopic niches of similar feeding types to show a clear overlap if our hypothesis was true. Our results showed that the isotopic niches of no two taxa overlapped within each feeding group, indicating different resource use and the absence of competition. The sediment analysis revealed that two of the deposit feeders inhabited significantly different mean grain sizes. The lack of overlap of isotopic niches within each feeding group may be due to differences in habitat and feeding behavior in the case of the deposit feeders and due to different migration behavior in the case of the predominately predacious species. However, competition may have occurred in the past, resulting in a divergence of feeding niches during evolution.

Purpose Acute whole-sediment bioassay with the estuarine and marine amphipod Corophium volutator (Pallas) is widely used to assess toxicity of sediments. According to the guidelines DIN EN ISO 16712, mortality is the determined toxic endpoint. Additionally, the reburrowing ability of the surviving organisms of this acute toxicity test in fresh uncontaminated sediment is suggested as the sublethal endpoint, but insufficient information (e.g., exact measurement protocols) on this endpoint is provided, thus confounding factors and the interpretation of the results. The aim of this study was to provide information on burrowing activity as a sublethal endpoint.

Defining the reference condition is one of the most critical aspects of ecosystem investigations since it describes the baseline against which the experimental sites will be evaluated and compared. In large-scale ecosystem experiments, this reference is ideally another ecosystem which is similar to the experimental system. We investigated two streams for their potential as experimental sites for a full-size pairwise ecosystem experiment. Temporal (2 years) and spatial (pool, riffle) variabilities of abiotic factors and as biotic element the structure of the macroinvertebrate communities were investigated. Criteria of similarity that we applied at the two streams were: (1) high similarity in abiotic factors, (2) only small differences in the faunal assemblages (abundance structures, composition, feeding types), and (3) that the differences between the two systems should not exceed the temporal and spatial differences within each system. Among the abiotic factors investigated, only the inorganic nutrients (nitrate and soluble reactive phosphorus), major ions (magnesium, calcium), electric conductivity, and pH showed significant differences between the two streams. Discharge rate, current velocity, temperature, and oxygen concentrations did not significantly differ between the streams. Also, the community structure did not differ in species richness, abundance, and biomass; and only small differences in dominance structure and feeding-type composition were observed. The differences between habitats within each stream were always higher than those between the streams. Thus, both the streams are characterized by a similar structure of the macroinvertebrate community, a main component of the stream food-web, which make them suitable for a full size pairwise ecosystem experiment. The present case study can form a basis for other full-size field experiments.

Two preservative treatments traditionally used in aquatic sciences, formalin (4%) and ethanol (70%), were compared for their effects on biomass estimations. The effects of both preservatives on wet weight, dry weight, and ash-free dry weight were determined for samples preserved for 10, 21, and 90 days. The effects were studied in four different macrofauna species commonly found in German estuaries: Heteromastus filiformis (Capitellidae, Polychaeta), Hediste diversicolor (Nereididae, Polychaeta), Corophium sp. (Amphipoda, Crustaceae), and Gammarus spp. (Amphipoda, Crustacea). The biomass estimates of preserved samples were compared with those of unpreserved samples. In all four species the loss in wet weight, dry weight, and ash-free dry weight was most pronounced within the first 10 days, and an additional weight loss was recorded between days 10 and 21. However, there was no further loss in weight for samples kept for as long as 90 days in the preservatives. In general, crustaceans exhibited higher weight loss than polychaetes, and smaller species (H. filiformis and Corophium sp.) showed higher weight loss and a higher variability than larger species. As our main result, significant differences between the two preservative treatments did never occur. Our results contradict some earlier investigations on this matter where formalin has been reported to be superior to alcoholic preservatives because weight loss was less pronounced than in ethanol. Factors affecting biomass estimates are discussed and we conclude that, for the macrofauna groups tested, the use of the toxic formalin solution is not justified when the major intent is biomass estimation.