Search

Contains fulltext : 282329.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access) BACKGROUND: High-quality evidence from trials directly comparing single antiplatelet therapies in symptomatic peripheral arterial disease (PAD) to dual antiplatelet therapies or acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) plus low-dose rivaroxaban is lacking. Therefore, we conducted a network meta-analysis on the effectiveness of all antithrombotic regimens studied in PAD. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials. The primary endpoints were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and major bleedings. Secondary endpoints were major adverse limb events (MALE) and acute limb ischaemia (ALI). For each outcome, a frequentist network meta-analysis was used to compare relative risks (RRs) between medication and ASA. ASA was the universal comparator since a majority of studies used ASA as in the reference group. RESULTS: Twenty-four randomized controlled trials were identified including 48,759 patients. With regard to reducing MACE, clopidogrel [RR 0.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.66-0.93], ticagrelor (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.65-0.97), ASA plus ticagrelor (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.64-0.97), and ASA plus low-dose rivaroxaban (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.76-0.93) were more effective than ASA, and equally effective to one another. As compared to ASA, major bleedings occurred more frequently with vitamin K antagonists, rivaroxaban, ASA plus vitamin K antagonists, and ASA plus low-dose rivaroxaban. All regimens were similar to ASA concerning MALE, while ASA plus low-dose rivaroxaban was more effective in preventing ALI (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.55-0.80). Subgroup analysis in patients undergoing peripheral revascularization revealed that ≥ 3 months after intervention, evidence of benefit regarding clopidogrel, ticagrelor, and ASA plus ticagrelor was lacking, while ASA plus low-dose rivaroxaban was more effective in preventing MACE (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.78-0.97) and MALE (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.81-0.97) compared to ASA. ASA plus clopidogrel was not superior to ASA in preventing MACE ≥ 3 months after revascularization. Evidence regarding antithrombotic treatment strategies within 3 months after a peripheral intervention was lacking. CONCLUSION: Clopidogrel, ticagrelor, ASA plus ticagrelor, and ASA plus low-dose rivaroxaban are superior to ASA monotherapy and equally effective to one another in preventing MACE in PAD. Of these four therapies, only ASA plus low-dose rivaroxaban provides a higher risk of major bleedings. More than 3 months after peripheral vascular intervention, ASA plus low-dose rivaroxaban is superior in preventing MACE and MALE compared to ASA but again at the cost of a higher risk of bleeding, while other treatment regimens show non-superiority. Based on the current evidence, clopidogrel may be considered the antithrombotic therapy of choice for most PAD patients, while in patients who underwent a peripheral vascular intervention, ASA plus low-dose rivaroxaban could be considered for the long-term (> 3 months) prevention of MACE and MALE.

Introduction Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is becoming a major health problem worldwide. Inflammation plays an important role in disease pathogenesis and recent studies have shown a potential role for the neutrophil serine proteases (NSPs) proteinase-3 (PR3) and neutrophil elastase (NE) in NAFLD as well as an imbalance between NSPs and their natural inhibitor alpha-1 antitrypsin (AAT). The aim of this study was to investigate whether PR3 and NE plasma concentrations are associated with NAFLD and/or type 2 diabetes. Methods To explore this hypothesis we used several cohorts: a cohort of 271 obese individuals with liver steatosis, a cohort of 41 patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD, a cohort of 401 obese type 2 diabetes patients and a cohort of 205 lean healthy controls; and measured PR3 and NE plasma concentrations. In addition, we measured AAT plasma concentrations in order to investigate if the ratios between NSPs and their natural inhibitor were altered in NAFLD and type 2 diabetes when compared to healthy controls. Results Our data shows an increase in PR3 and NE concentrations and a decrease in AAT concentrations in obese patients when compared to controls. Moreover, PR3 plasma concentrations are increased in patients with liver steatosis. Furthermore, PR3 and NE concentrations in the liver are associated with the advanced stages of NAFLD characterized by NASH and/ or liver fibrosis. Additionally, PR3 and NE concentrations were up-regulated in patients with type 2 diabetes when compared to lean and obese controls. Conclusion We conclude that circulating levels of NSPs associate with obesity-related metabolic disorders. Further research is needed to clearly establish the role of these proteases and investigate whether they could be used as non-invasive markers for NAFLD and/or type 2 diabetes. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s10020-019-0084-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Purpose Concomitant treatment with the glucose-lowering drug metformin and the platelet aggregation inhibitor dipyridamole often occurs in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who have suffered a cerebrovascular event. The gastrointestinal uptake of metformin is mediated by the human equilibrative nucleoside transporter 4 (ENT4), which is inhibited by dipyridamole in preclinical studies. We hypothesized that dipyridamole lowers the plasma exposure to metformin. Methods Eighteen healthy volunteers (mean age 23 years; 9 male) were randomized in an open-label crossover study. Subjects were allocated to treatment with metformin 500 mg twice daily in combination with dipyridamole slow-release 200 mg twice daily or to metformin alone for 4 days. After a washout period of 10 days, the volunteers were crossed over to the alternative treatment arm. Blood samples were collected during a 10-h period after intake of the last metformin dose. The primary endpoint was the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC0–12h) and the maximum plasma metformin concentration (Cmax). Results In healthy subjects, dipyridamole did not significantly affect Cmax nor AUC0–12h of metformin under steady-state conditions. Conclusions Previous in vitro studies report that dipyridamole inhibits the ENT4 transporter that mediates gastrointestinal uptake of metformin. In contrast, co-administration of dipyridamole at therapeutic dosages to healthy volunteers does not have a clinically relevant effect on metformin plasma steady-state exposure. This observation is reassuring for patients who are treated with this combination of drugs. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00228-016-2039-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

In patients with diabetes mellitus, the incidence of cardiovascular disease is increased, and the outcome following cardiovascular events is worse. The antihyperglycemic drug metformin appears to limit cardiovascular death in patients with type 2 diabetes. Indeed, preclinical studies have demonstrated that metformin limits (myocardial) ischemia and reperfusion injury, independent from its glucose-lowering effect. This cardioprotection is mediated by activation of the Reperfusion Injury Salvage Kinase (RISK) pathway, activation of AMPK and by an increased formation of adenosine. In addition, metformin can modulate several cardiovascular risk factors and reduces the development of heart failure in murine models. Consequently, treatment with metformin might potentially improve cardiovascular outcome in patients at risk for myocardial ischemia, even if these patients do not have diabetes. In the current paper, we focus on the direct cardioprotective actions of metformin and the mechanisms that underlie these effects.

Background In patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), cardiovascular events are more common, and the outcome following a myocardial infarction is worse than in nondiabetic subjects. Ischemic or pharmacological preconditioning are powerful interventions to reduce ischemia reperfusion (IR)-injury. However, animal studies have shown that the presence of T1DM can limit these protective effects. Therefore, we aimed to study the protective effect of ischemic preconditioning in patients with T1DM, and to explore the role of plasma insulin and glucose on this effect. Methods 99mTechnetium-annexin A5 scintigraphy was used to detect IR-injury. IR-injury was induced by unilateral forearm ischemic exercise. At reperfusion, Tc-annexin A5 was administered, and IR-injury was expressed as the percentage difference in radioactivity in the thenar muscle between the experimental and control arm 4 hours after reperfusion. 15 patients with T1DM were compared to 21 nondiabetic controls. The patients were studied twice, with or without ischemic preconditioning (10 minutes of forearm ischemia and reperfusion). Patients were studied in either normoglycemic hyperinsulinemic conditions (n = 8) or during hyperglycemic normoinsulinemia (n = 7). The controls were studied once either with (n = 8) or without (n = 13) ischemic preconditioning. Results Patients with diabetes were less vulnerable to IR-injury than nondiabetic healthy controls (12.8 ± 2.4 and 11.0 ± 5.1% versus 27.5 ± 4.5% in controls; p Conclusions Patients with T1DM are more tolerant to forearm IR than healthy controls in our experimental model. The efficacy of ischemic preconditioning to limit IR-injury, however, is reduced by acute hyperglycemia. Trial Registration The study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00184821)

Previous studies have shown that the endogenous nucleoside adenosine is able to modulate inflammation and to prevent associated organ injury. Dipyridamole, an adenosine re-uptake inhibitor, increases extracellular adenosine concentrations during unfavorable conditions (for example, inflammation), and as such may modulate the inflammatory response. We examined the effects of dipyridamole treatment on innate immunity during human experimental endotoxemia.

We read with interest the study by Christiansen and colleagues [1] in the previous issue of Critical Care. In a large cohort study, the authors report that among diabetic patients who are admitted to the ICU, the preadmission use of metformin is associated with a lower mortality rate. Here, we highlight that metformin limits ischemiareperfusion injury (IRI) and modulates inflammation by increased adenosine receptor stimulation and propose that these mechanisms contribute to the reported survival benefit. In prospective studies in patients with diabetes, metformin use is associated with lower cardiovascular mortality compared with alternative glucose-lowering agents, suggesting a direct cardioprotective effect of metformin [2]. In animal studies, metformin potently limits myocardial infarct size [2]. This is caused, at least in part, by increased formation of the endogenous nucleoside adenosine [3]. Adenosine receptor stimulation increases tolerance of various organs against IRI and potently modulates inflammation [4]. Indeed, pharmacological elevation of endogenous adenosine modulates the inflammatory response during experimental human endotoxemia [5]. In the study by Christiansen and colleagues, many patients were admitted to the ICU because of cardiovascular diseases or (non-)cardiac surgery. It is likely that in these patients IRI contributes to organ dysfunction. Therefore, we propose that the survival benefit of metformin is caused by limitation of IRI and inflammation due to increased adenosine receptor signaling. Based on this hypothesis, several randomized controlled trials are currently being performed to investigate whether metformin reduces myocardial injury in patients with a myocardial infarction and patients undergoing cardiac surgery (NCT01438723 and NCT01217307). We await with interest the results of these trials.