1. Remaining Human in COVID-19: Dialogues on Psychogeography
- Author
-
Degen, Johanna L., Smart, Gemma Lucy, Quinnell, Rosanne, O’Doherty, Kieran C., and Rhodes, Paul
- Subjects
Psychogeography ,050101 languages & linguistics ,Social psychology (sociology) ,050109 social psychology ,Resistance (psychoanalysis) ,Context (language use) ,Walking ,Anthropocentrism ,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous) ,Group Healing ,Group Coping ,Semiotics ,0501 psychology and cognitive sciences ,Sociology ,Dialogic ,Dystopia ,Interdisciplinary Methods ,05 social sciences ,Arena of Pandemic ,COVID-19 ,Viralscape ,Dialogical Inquiry ,Epistemology ,Coronavirus ,Psychology (miscellaneous) ,Crystallization ,Experimental Methods ,Social Sciences (miscellaneous) - Abstract
Post-COVID-19 environments have challenged our embodied identities with these challenges coming from a variety of domains, that is, microbiological, semiotic, and digital. We are embedded in a new complex set of relations, with other species, with cultural signs, and with technology and venturing further into an era that pushes back on our anthropocentrism to create a post-human dystopia. This does not imply that we are less human or forfeit ethics in this state of flux, but can lead to considering new ways of being alive and humanists. The aim of this project was to explore walking through our associated psychogeographies as captured in photographs and text from individual walks, as the means by which to characterize responses to the distress of the pandemic and to assess resistance to non-being. The psychogeographies were the starting points for our dialogic enquiry between authors who each represent living theory, representing their own emergent knowledge, inseparable from personal commitments and history. Walking and the associated images and reflections, provided a way to regulate our affect, reconnecting with our bodies, leading to understand and adapt to new meanings of context and ways of coping and healing in this new becoming. The interdisciplinarity of philosophy, social psychology, botany, and clinical psychology is nonetheless rejected in favour of multi-vocality; each author representing their own emergent, living theory, inseparable from personal commitments, and history.
- Published
- 2021