Search

To define a set of indicators that could be used to improve quality in intensive care medicine.An European Society of Intensive Care Medicine Task Force on Quality and Safety identified all commonly used key quality indicators. This international Task Force consisted of 18 experts, all with a self-proclaimed interest in the area. Through a modified Delphi process seeking greater than 90% consensual agreement from this nominal group, the indicators were then refined through a series of iterative processes.A total of 111 indicators of quality were initially found, and these were consolidated into 102 separate items. After five discrete rounds of debate, these indicators were reduced to a subset of nine that all had greater than 90% agreement from the nominal group. These indicators can be used to describe the structures (3), processes (2) and outcomes (4) of intensive care. Across this international group, it was much more difficult to obtain consensual agreement on the indicators describing processes of care than on the structures and outcomes.This document contains nine indicators, all of which have a high level of consensual agreement from an international Task Force, which could be used to improve quality in routine intensive care practice.

BACKGROUND The abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) is a life-threatening condition and may affect any critically ill patient. Little is known about the recognition and management of the ACS in Germany. METHODS A postal questionnaire was sent to departments of surgery and anesthesia of German hospitals with more than 450 beds. RESULTS From the 222 eligible hospitals a total of 113 replies were received. Most respondents (95%) indicated that the ACS plays a role in their clinical practice. Measurement of intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) is not performed by 26% while it is routinely done by 30%. Intra-abdominal pressure is mostly (94%) assessed via the bladder pressure. Of the respondents 41% measure IAP only in those patients thought likely to develop ACS. Risk factors of the ACS would lead to IAP monitoring in 10-23% of cases. The majority (86%) would require signs of organ dysfunction together with exceeding the IAD threshold in order to opt for a surgical decompression. The attitude towards the critical threshold (>20 mmHg or >25 mmhg) divided respondents into two groups of similar size (39% compared to 47%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS German anesthesiologists and surgeons are familiar with the ACS. However, about one-quarter never measure IAP and there is a considerable variance as to which patients are at risk to develop ACS and how often IAP should be measured in these patients. This could indicate a lack of acceptance or simply a persisting need for more data concerning the avoidance and treatment of the ACS.

Background Scientific evidence is accumulating that non-invasive ventilation (NIV) may be beneficial for different patient groups with acute respiratory insufficiency (ARI). The aim of the new S3 guidelines is to propagate evidence-based knowledge about the indications and limitations of NIV in clinical practice. Methods A total of 28 experts from 12 German medical societies were involved in the process of development of the present guidelines. These experts systematically analyzed approximately 2,900 publications. Finally, the recommendations were discussed and approved in two consensus conferences. Results In hypercapnic ARI, NIV reduces the length of stay and mortality during intensive care treatment [grade A recommendation (A)]. Patients with cardiopulmonary edema should be treated with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or NIV (A). For immunocompromized patients with ARI, NIV reduces the mortality (A). In patients with postextubation respiratory failure and during weaning from mechanical ventilation, NIV reduces the risk of reintubation (A). For patients who decline to be ventilated invasively, NIV may be an acceptable alternative (B). Non-invasive ventilation can also successfully be used in pediatric patients with ARI caused by different reasons (C). In acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) NIV cannot generally be recommended because the failure rate is relatively high. Conclusion Non-invasive ventilation is still not as widely implemented in clinical medicine as would be expected on the basis of the scientific literature. The aim of the present guidelines is to further propagate NIV for the treatment of ARI.

A pathological increase of intraabdominal pressure (IAP) is frequently observed in severely ill patients suffering from surgical diseases. This may lead to the abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) which is characterized by an IAP >20 mmHg (>2.67 kPa) and failure of one or more organ systems. The mortality of ACS exceeds 60%. Knowledge concerning the sequelae of ACS is abundant, however, measurement of IAP is not routinely performed even if patients present with corresponding risk factors. This is probably due to a variable incidence of ACS and scepticism regarding the results of bladder pressure measurement. However, measurement of IAP can now be performed semi-automatically, continuously and in a standardized fashion. The therapy of ACS, i.e. decompression laparotomy and laparostomy, is undisputed. Since a heterogeneous group of patients can be affected, monitoring of IAP is indicated in patients needing intensive care. A consistent registration of IAP will improve knowledge and guidelines regarding the therapy of a pathologically increased IAP. Nevertheless, patients in whom ACS is suspected should be decompressed as soon as possible.

Sedation and analgesia are relevant aspects for the adequate treatment of patients in an intensive care unit. Recent drug developments and new strategies for ventilation provide improved sedation management allowing better adaptation to the clinical background and individual needs of the patient. This article provides an overview on the application of different substance groups. Focus is placed on newly developed pharmaceuticals such as dexmedetomidine. Another aspect is scoring system-related and EEG-based monitoring of depth of sedation. Modern concepts of analgesia and sedation for ICU patients have been developed based on the interaction of different parameters such as adaptive sedation and analgesia management (ASAM).

Mechanical ventilation is a lifesaving procedure in routine intensive care medicine. However, during recent years we have learned that intubation and prolonged mechanical ventilation can be associated with quite serious side effects. Therefore, one of the major goals in the management of the mechanically ventilated patient is to liberate the patient from the ventilator at the earliest time possible. In about 20% of all mechanically ventilated patients, the process of weaning is difficult and time consuming so that these patients need a specific weaning technique. It has been shown that the duration of weaning might be shortened and its outcome might be improved when standardized protocols are used to detect the earliest time when a patient is able to breath spontaneously. However, although this evidence suggests that it is in general possible to improve the process of weaning, those studies have not resulted in a clear preference for one or the other weaning method. Both, T-piece trials as well as spontaneous breathing trials with low level pressure support have been successfully used for weaning. Since it is well known that the intubated patients has to overcome an additional breathing workload which is imposed mainly by the endotracheal tube, we have a preference for the spontaneous breathing trials using pressure support to compensate for this added workload.

The airway occlusion pressure, P0.1, is an index for the neuro-muscular activation of the respiratory system. It has been shown to be a very useful indicator for the ability of patients receiving ventilatory support to be weaned from mechanical ventilation. Since the standard measurement technique for P0.1 determination is technically complex, it is not widely available for clinical purposes. For that reason a P0.1 measurement technique was developed as an integrated function in a standard respirator (Evita, Drager, Lubeck, Germany). This technique is easy to use and does not need any further equipment. We validated this new technique by comparing it to standard P0.1 measurements in a mechanical lung model as well as in ventilated patients. In the lung model we found a correlation between the Evita measurement and standard measurements of r = 0.99. In 6 ventilated patients the correlation was r = 0.78. Since the Evita P0.1 and the standard measurement had to be performed during two different breaths, this little poorer correlation in patients may be due to a significant breath-by-breath variability in P0.1. Comparing the Evita P0.1 and the standard measurement within one breath resulted in a clearly better correlation (r = 0.89). We conclude that this new measurement technique provides an easy and accurate P0.1 measurement using standard respiratory equipment when tested in a lung model. In patient measurements the method is less precise, which is probably due to the variable waveforms of the inspiratory driving pressure seen in patients, for example when intrinsic PEEP is present.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The pathophysiology of ALI and ARDS induces distinct changes in respiratory mechanics. For more than 30 years respiratory mechanics have been assessed by analysis of the static pressure–volume (P–V) curve. Ventilation, however, is a dynamic process and the mechanical properties of the respiratory system can be assessed under dynamic conditions [1]. If the respiratory system shows a specific dynamic behaviour that is not present during static conditions, differing results are to be expected if mechanics are analysed during dynamic conditions. The aim of the present study was to test whether such differences can be observed in ARDS and ALI.