Search

We evaluated the feasibility of the sentinel lymph node technique to refine staging and potentially individualize therapy for anal cancer. Seventeen patients with cancer of the anal canal underwent peritumoral injection of 99mTc-colloid, followed 17 hours later by lymphoscintigraphy. A selective lymph node biopsy (SLNB) was attempted in 12 of 13 cases with scintigraphically detected SLNs. Lymph node metastases were present in 5 of 12 cases (42%); in 2 of these 5 cases, micrometastases were detected only by immunohistochemical staining. Hence, SLNB refines the diagnostic workup for anal cancer and provides an accurate basis for individualized therapy.

The largest subgroup of patients with metastasised urological malignancies are those with metastases of the bone. Lesions of bones frequently reduce the patients quality of life. Therefore a sufficient therapy is crucial. First of all the appropriate diagnostic procedure of the lesion/lesions is necessary because e the right choice of diagnostic measures may already improve quality of life. Besides the most frequently used local irradiation a systemic radiotherapy may be the adequate therapy in patients with disseminated disease. Renal cell-, bladder and penile cancer respectively are the urological malignancies frequently metastasising into the brain. Adequate diagnostic procedures and therapy are crucial to the patients quality of life for the remaining lifetime. Besides a whole brain irradiation as standard therapy stereotactic radiotherapy is a high precision tool to destroy intracerebral tumour. There are many other locations of metastatic disease (i.e. lymph node or soft tissue metastasis, et cetera) where palliative external beam irradiation may provide relief from symptoms such as pain, lymph oedema or bleeding and thus increase quality of life. Psychological and social care are of great value besides symptom oriented therapy (i.e. radiotherapy, drugs, et cetera) to achieve an optimal palliation/quality of life.

PURPOSE Four different three-dimensional planning techniques for localized radiotherapy of prostate cancer were compared with regard to dose homogeneity within the target volume and dose to organs at risk, dependent upon tumor stage. PATIENTS AND METHODS Six patients with stage T1, 7 patients with stage T2 and 4 patients with stage T3 were included in this study. Four different 3D treatment plans (rotation, 4-field, 5-field and 6-field technique) were calculated for each patient. Dose was calculated with the reference point at the isocenter (100%). The planning target volume was encompassed within the 95% isodose surface. All the techniques used different shaped portal for each beam. Dose volume histograms were created and compared for the planning target volume and the organs at risk (33%, 50%, 66% volume level) in all techniques. RESULTS The 4 different three-dimensional planning techniques revealed no differences concerning dose homogeneity within the planning target volume. The dose volume distribution at organs at risk show differences between the calculated techniques. In our study the best protection for bladder and rectum in stage T1 and T2 was achieved by the 6-field technique. A significant difference was achieved between 6-field and 4-field technique only in the 50% volume of the bladder (p = 0.034), between the 6-field and rotation technique (all volume levels) and between 5-field and rotation technique (all volume levels). In stage T1, T2 6-field and 4-field technique in 50% (p = 0.033) and 66% (p = 0.011) of the rectum volume. In stage T3 a significant difference was not observed between the 4 techniques. The best protection of head of the femur was achieved by the rotation technique. CONCLUSION In the localized radiotherapy of prostate cancer in stage T1 or T2 the best protection for bladder and rectum was achieved by a 3D-planned conformal 6-field technique. If the seminal vesicles have been included in the target volume and in the case of large planning target volume other techniques should be taken for a better protection for organs at risk e. g. a 3D-planned 4-field technique box technique.