Search

The authors tested five full scale samples of nominal 6 mm thick heat strengthened glass to failure under uniform lateral loading. One sample was clear glass, one sample had full coverage ceramic enamel frit, and the other three samples had ceramic enamel frit patterns with different percentages of coverage. In testing the samples with ceramic enamel frit applications, researchers oriented the specimens to place the ceramic enamel frit in tension under lateral loading. The authors found that the samples with ceramic enamel frit displayed considerably lower magnitudes of load resistance than did the clear heat strengthened sample. In addition, the authors noted that every fracture origin they have inspected to date from the 75 specimens with ceramic enamel frit patterns occurred underneath frit. Micrographs of fracture origins indicate that the frit may actually damage the glass surface during the heat strengthening process. This study has significant implications for architectural glass design.

In the past few decades, designers increasingly work on glazing projects across the world requiring the use of international glazing standards that often differ from the designer’s national code. Commonly specified international glazing standards include prEN16612, AS1288, and ASTM E1300. Each of these standards has a different approach to determine window glass strength. This paper explores one aspect of glazing design for insulating glass units, the method for estimating the load sharing between the lites comprising insulating glass units. Each glazing standard uses a different method for estimating load sharing and how the effects of environmental loads are incorporated into the estimation. Environmental loads include but are not limited to changes in atmospheric pressure, resulting from elevation, climatic, and temperature variations. Additionally, several iterative methods appear in technical literature that attempt to account for most known factors affecting insulating glass load sharing. Each of these methods addresses environmental loads differently with differing degrees of accuracy. This paper presents comparisons between the three glazing standards above and an iterative method for load sharing with environmental loads in double and triple glazed insulating glass units. The major factors varied in the investigation are insulating glass unit constructions, dimensions, glass lite thicknesses, air space thickness, temperature and pressure and atmospheric pressure changes due to elevation change. Pressure versus load sharing percentage curves are presented for select double and triple insulating glass unit constructions. Figures in this paper will show the load sharing trends of different similarly loaded insulating glass units due to varying the pressure differential between the air space(s) and atmospheric pressures. The results of this study will indicate differences between the load sharing methods and provide example scenarios where the methods produce similar and different estimates of insulating glass load sharing.

In the published article, Table 8 is incorrect (the last value in column 2 and all numbers in column 3). The correct table is given below