1. Gut microbiota of frugo-folivorous sifakas across environments
- Author
-
Elodi Rambeloson, Lydia K. Greene, Marina B. Blanco, Brian Fanelli, Karlis Graubics, Christine M. Drea, and Rita R. Colwell
- Subjects
0106 biological sciences ,0301 basic medicine ,Firmicutes ,Veterinary medicine ,Population ,Captivity ,Zoology ,Gut flora ,Microbiology ,010603 evolutionary biology ,01 natural sciences ,Folivory ,Sifaka ,03 medical and health sciences ,SF600-1100 ,Madagascar ,medicine ,education ,Amplicon sequencing ,Folivore ,Gut microbiome ,education.field_of_study ,biology ,Lemur ,Lachnospiraceae ,General Medicine ,biology.organism_classification ,medicine.disease ,QR1-502 ,Strepsirrhine primate ,030104 developmental biology ,Husbandry ,Dysbiosis ,Metagenomic sequencing ,Research Article - Abstract
Background Captive animals, compared to their wild counterparts, generally harbor imbalanced gut microbiota owing, in part, to their altered diets. This imbalance is particularly striking for folivores that fundamentally rely on gut microbiota for digestion, yet rarely receive sufficient dietary fiber in captivity. We examine the critically endangered Coquerel’s sifaka (Propithecus coquereli), an anatomically specialized, rather than facultative, folivore that consumes a seasonal frugo-folivorous diet in the wild, but is provisioned predominantly with seasonal foliage and orchard vegetables in captivity. Using amplicon and metagenomic sequencing applied to fecal samples collected from two wild and one captive population (each comprising multiple groups), we clarify how dietary variation underlies the perturbational effect of captivity on the structure and function of this species’ gut microbiota. Results The gut microbiota of wild sifakas varied by study population, most notably in community evenness and in the abundance of diet-associated microbes from Prevotellaeceae and Lachnospiraceae. Nevertheless, the differences among wild subjects were minor compared to those evident between wild and captive sifakas: Unusually, the consortia of captive sifakas were the most diverse, but lacked representation of endemic Bacteroidetes and metagenomic capacity for essential amino-acid biosynthesis. Instead, they were enriched for complex fiber metabolizers from the Firmicutes phylum, for archaeal methanogens, and for several metabolic pathways putatively linked to plant fiber and secondary compound metabolism. Conclusions The relatively minor differences in gut microbial structure and function between wild sifaka populations likely reflect regional and/or temporal environmental variability, whereas the major differences observed in captive conspecifics, including the loss of endemic microbes, but gain in low-abundance taxa, likely reflect imbalanced or unstable consortia. Indeed, community perturbation may not necessarily entail decreased community diversity. Moreover, signatures of greater fiber degradation indicate that captive sifakas consume a more fibrous diet compared to their wild counterparts. These results do not mirror those typically reported for folivores and herbivores, suggesting that the direction and strength of captivity-induced ‘dysbiosis’ may not be universal across species with similar feeding strategies. We propose that tailored, species-specific dietary interventions in captivity, aimed at better approximating naturally foraged diets, could functionally ‘rewild’ gut microbiota and facilitate successful management of diverse species.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF