1. Long-term results of intravesical chemoprophylaxis of superficial bladder cancer: experience of the Japanese urological cancer research group for Adriamycin
- Author
-
Kenkichi Koiso, Toyofumi Ueda, Shigeo Isaka, Yosuke Matsumura, Hiroshi Ohe, Tadao Niijima, Kazuya Tashiro, Toyohei Machida, Hideyuki Akaza, Toshihiko Kotake, Jun Shimazaki, Yoshitada Ohi, Koji Obata, Susumu Kagawa, and Yasuo Ohashi
- Subjects
Male ,Cancer Research ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Mitomycin ,Urology ,Disease ,Toxicology ,Drug Administration Schedule ,law.invention ,Randomized controlled trial ,Actuarial Analysis ,law ,Humans ,Medicine ,Pharmacology (medical) ,Stage (cooking) ,Aged ,Pharmacology ,business.industry ,Incidence (epidemiology) ,Mitomycin C ,Middle Aged ,Combined Modality Therapy ,Surgery ,Survival Rate ,Regimen ,Administration, Intravesical ,Urinary Bladder Neoplasms ,Oncology ,Doxorubicin ,Tumor progression ,Chemoprophylaxis ,Female ,Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ,business ,Follow-Up Studies - Abstract
Long-term results were analyzed in terms of tumor progression and survival in patients with superficial bladder cancer who were enrolled in the second intravesical chemoprophylactic study of the Japanese Urological Cancer Research Group for Adriamycin, which was started in July 1982. This study was a prospective, randomized, controlled trial conducted on primary tumors treated with a long-term instillation regimen that involved control versus intravesical instillations of Adriamycin or mitomycin C given once a week for the first 2 weeks, once every other week for 14 weeks, once a month for 8 months, and once every 3 months for 1 year, for a total of 21 instillations in 2 years. An analysis of the prophylactic effects of such treatment on bladder tumors after TUR has previously been performed, and the results have been published elsewhere. The present study represents a follow-up of the above trial. Of the 671 cases previously analyzed with regard to tumor prophylaxis, 158 cases (23.5%) were eligible to be followed for tumor progression and survival. A detailed comparison of the background factors between these 158 patients and the other 513 cases revealed no statistically significant difference. Thus, the 158 evaluable cases might reasonably be considered to represent all patients enrolled in the second study, and the results were thought to be reasonable enough to reflect the long-term efficacy of the long-term instillation regimen adopted in this study. The median follow-up for these 158 cases was 6.6 years. Tumor progression in terms of the disease stage and/or grade occurred in 43 of 127 patients who received prophylactic instillations and in 12 of 31 control cases. No significant difference in the incidence of tumor progression was found between the treatment and the control groups. In addition, no difference in survival was observed between the treatment group and the control group. Survival was also compared between patients who showed tumor progression and those who did not. All patients whose tumors did not progress survived, whereas the 7-year survival of those exhibiting tumor progression was less than 90%.
- Published
- 1992