1. Assessment of relative bioavailability of heavy metals in soil using in vivo mouse model and its implication for risk assessment compared with bioaccessibility using in vitro assay
- Author
-
Jiwen Luo, Siyun Liang, Weijian Pan, Lixuan Zeng, Yuan Kang, Ning Li, and Qiuyun Zhang
- Subjects
Male ,0301 basic medicine ,Environmental Engineering ,Soil test ,Biological Availability ,In Vitro Techniques ,010501 environmental sciences ,Risk Assessment ,01 natural sciences ,Mice ,Soil ,03 medical and health sciences ,Geochemistry and Petrology ,In vivo ,Metals, Heavy ,Animals ,Soil Pollutants ,Environmental Chemistry ,Poor correlation ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,General Environmental Science ,Water Science and Technology ,Chemistry ,Heavy metals ,Uptake kinetics ,General Medicine ,In vitro digestion ,In vitro ,Bioavailability ,030104 developmental biology ,Environmental chemistry - Abstract
There is limited study to simultaneously determine the relative bioavailability of heavy metals such as Cd, Pb, Cu, Cr(VI), and Ni in soil samples. In the present study, the bioaccessibility of heavy metals using in vitro assay was compared with the relative bioavailability of heavy metals using in vivo mouse model. The bioaccessibility of heavy metals ranged from 9.05 ± 0.97 % (Cr) to 42.8 ± 3.52 % (Cd). The uptake profile of heavy metals in soil and solution samples in mouse revealed that the uptake kinetics could be fitted to a two-compartment model. The relative bioavailability of heavy meals ranged from 34.8 ± 7.0 % (Ni) to 131 ± 20.3 % (Cu). Poor correlation between bioaccessibility and relative bioavailability of heavy metals was observed (r (2) = 0.11, p > 0.05). The relative bioavailability of heavy metals was significantly higher than the bioaccessibility of heavy metals (p
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF