1. A Meta-analysis of TAE/TACE Versus Emergency Surgery in the Treatment of Ruptured HCC
- Author
-
Xinjian Xu, Changsheng Chen, Xiangzhong Huang, and Qiang Liu
- Subjects
Spontaneous rupture ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Carcinoma, Hepatocellular ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Cochrane Library ,Lower risk ,030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Emergency surgery ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Hepatectomy ,Humans ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Embolization ,Chemoembolization, Therapeutic ,Rupture, Spontaneous ,business.industry ,Liver Neoplasms ,Significant difference ,Treatment Outcome ,Meta-analysis ,Hemostasis ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business - Abstract
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of TAE/TACE versus emergency surgery (ES) for spontaneous rupture of HCC (rHCC). Eight databases (Web of Science, Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrial.gov, Wanfang, CNKI and VIP) were searched to obtain all related literature from the inception dates to October 2019. Subgroup analyses based on the kind of study design and kind of embolization were conducted. Twenty-one studies comparing TAE/TACE with ES were eligible. A total of 974 rHCC participants (485 participants treated with TACE/TAE and 489 participants treated with ES) were included in the present meta-analysis. TAE/TACE group was associated with lower risk of complications (OR = 0.36; 95% CI, 0.22–0.57; P
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF