Search

Studies comparing the recovery profiles of isoflurane- and propofol-based anesthesia for major intracranial surgery have reported contradictory results. The aim of our study was to clarify the emergence status in both regimens by investigating uniformly managed neuroanesthesia cases. The anesthesia database at Yamagata University Hospital covering the period 2002–2005 was retrospectively investigated for adult patients who underwent craniotomy for primary brain tumor excision. General anesthesia was provided by an isoflurane- (ISO group) or propofol-based (PROP group) regimen. Times to extubation and operating room (OR) discharge, perioperative consciousness levels, and perioperative variables were compared. Of the 202 surgeries performed during the study period, 77 and 82 patients were anesthetized with isoflurane and propofol, respectively. Demographic data were comparable between the two groups, although the American Society of Anesthesiology grade was worse in the PROP group. Extubation times [39.5 ± 14.6 min (ISO) vs. 29.5 ± 14.9 min (PROP); P

Prostaglandin E(1) (PGE(1)) has been shown to provide short-term neuroprotection against various types of brain ischemia in a dose-dependent manner in mice. However, these findings were obtained from experiments performed without any control over physiological parameters. We performed an outcome study where physiological parameters were controlled in an attempt to confirm the dose-dependant neuroprotective effects of PGE(1).A rat model of severe forebrain ischemia was used. Two doses of PGE(1) were administered during the pre-ischemic period, a low dose (LowPG group) and a high dose (HighPG group). Normotension was maintained in the LowPG group, while hypotension was induced in the HighPG group. In separate groups, normal saline (Control) or sodium nitroprusside (SNP) were infused to compare outcomes under similar blood pressure conditions. Histological outcomes in the hippocampal CA1 and entorhinal cortex were evaluated 5 days post-ischemia.HighPG resulted in hyperglycemia. The percentage of dead neurons in the hippocampal CA1 and entorhinal cortex were similar in the Control, SNP, and HighPG groups, the percentage being significantly attenuated in the LowPG group (CA1: Control = 92.8 +/- 2.4%, LowPG = 85.0 +/- 8.5%, HighPG = 95.3 +/- 2.4%, and SNP = 96.4 +/- 0.7%, P0.01; entorhinal cortex: Control = 73.8 +/- 4.0%, LowPG = 53.2 +/- 12.3%, HighPG = 72.1 +/- 12.6%, and SNP = 76.5 +/- 4.1%, P0.01).Pre-ischemic administration of low-dose PGE(1) in rats provided neuroprotection against severe forebrain ischemia. A dose dependency was not observed with PGE(1) dose and outcome.

Background Dexmedetomidine (Dex) provides sedation and analgesia by acting on central alpha-2 receptors and is suitable for use after extubation because it has little respiratory depression. Considering the sympathoinhibitory and anxiolytic action of Dex, there is the possibility that Dex might reduce the incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF), which is recognized as a common complication after cardiovascular surgery. We investigated whether the postoperative incidence of AF decreased in patients who received Dex only during the nighttime in the intensive care unit (ICU). Methods We retrospectively reviewed ICU charts to determine the incidence of AF and associated factors during the 2-day period after tracheal extubation in patients who underwent cardiovascular surgery from November 2009 to November 2010. The patients were divided into a Dex group (n = 16) and a non-Dex group (n = 29). Results There were no differences in AF risk factors except for diabetes between the two groups. The average rate of Dex administration was 0.3 ± 0.2 μg/kg/h. There were also no differences between the groups in heart rate during the daytime, central venous pressure, body temperature, white blood cell count, serum level of C-reactive protein, catecholamine use, beta-blocker use, and amount of fentanyl. AF developed in one patient in the Dex group (6.3 %) and ten patients in the non-Dex group (34.5 %) during the observation period, and the difference was significant (p = 0.035). None of the risk factors for AF was significantly associated with AF in univariate analysis; however, multivariate logistic regression analysis using age, Dex use, and beta-blocker use, extracted because their p values in univariate analysis were not exceeding 0.15, showed that Dex use was the only factor associated with the development of AF (p = 0.045, odds ratio 9.75 [1.05–90.8]). Conclusions The results suggest that adequate sedation with Dex during the nighttime can reduce the incidence of AF in cardiovascular surgery patients after extubation.