Search

The α4s7 integrin is upregulated on naive and memory T cell subsets in patients who subsequently develop gastrointestinal (GI) acute GVHD. Natalizumab (Tysabri®, Biogen Inc.) acts against the α4 subunit that mediates homing of lymphocytes to the GI tract. We initiated a phase II study of natalizumab with corticosteroids for initial treatment of acute GI GVHD. In total, 300 mg IV of natalizumab was given, with steroids initiated up to 3 days prior. Twenty-one subjects were treated, median age was 63 years (range 38–74), and 15 (71%) were male. Eighteen (86%) underwent RIC, 15 (71%) received MUD, and all received PBSCs. Overall GVHD at enrollment was grade II in 4 and grade III in 17. The primary endpoint, day 56 GVHD-free survival rate, was attained in 33.3%. The overall response rate at day 28 and 56 was 57% and 52%, respectively. Six of eight CRs were durable for 1 year. Five experienced toxicity possibly related to natalizumab and ten had infections before day 100. 2-year OS was 43% (95% CI 22–62%) and 2-year NRM was 52% (95% CI 29–71%). Natalizumab with corticosteroids as initial treatment of acute GI GVHD is safe, effective, and durable.

We present a single-center retrospective series of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) with the use of posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) in the setting of nonmalignant hematological conditions. Nine patients were treated between 2013 and 2019. Nonmyeloablative conditioning consisted of antithymocyte globulin, fludarabine, low-dose cyclophosphamide, and total body irradiation (200cGy) followed by allogeneic bone marrow infusion. Post-BMT GVHD prophylaxis was with PTCy, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil. At a median follow-up of 24 months (range 4, 63), all patients are alive, with donor-derived hematopoiesis and free of significant acute or chronic GVHD. Donors were haploidentical (n = 6), fully matched unrelated (n = 2), and fully matched sibling (n = 1). Neutrophil and platelet engraftment occurred at a median of 21 days and 33 days, respectively, after transplantation. Three patients (3/9, 33%) experienced stage 1-2 acute skin GVHD. The only cases of chronic GVHD are in three patients (3/9, 33%) with ocular disease (two mild, one moderate). No patient has required systemic immunosuppression beyond 12 months after BMT. PTCy-based nonmyeloablative allogeneic BMT is safe and effective for nonmalignant hematologic conditions and should be prospectively compared with historical regimens.

Correspondence: Donor body mass index does not predict graft versus host disease following hematopoietic cell transplantation

Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is a potentially curative treatment for children and adults with malignant and non-malignant diseases. Despite increasing survival rates, long-term morbidity following HCT is substantial. Neurocognitive dysfunction is a serious cause of morbidity, yet little is known about neurocognitive dysfunction following HCT. To address this gap, collaborative efforts of the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research and the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation undertook an expert review of neurocognitive dysfunction following HCT. In this review, we define what constitutes neurocognitive dysfunction, characterize its risk factors and sequelae, describe tools and methods to assess neurocognitive function in HCT recipients, and discuss possible interventions for HCT patients with this condition. This review aims to help clinicians understand the scope of this health-related problem, highlight its impact on well-being of survivors, and to help determine factors that may improve identification of patients at risk for declines in cognitive functioning after HCT. In particular, we review strategies for preventing and treating neurocognitive dysfunction in HCT patients. Lastly, we highlight the need for well-designed studies to develop and test interventions aimed at preventing and improving neurocognitive dysfunction and its sequelae following HCT.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT) recipients have a substantial risk of developing secondary solid cancers, particularly beyond 5 years after HCT and without reaching a plateau overtime. A working group was established through the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research and the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation with the goal to facilitate implementation of cancer screening appropriate to HCT recipients. The working group reviewed guidelines and methods for cancer screening applicable to the general population and reviewed the incidence and risk factors for secondary cancers after HCT. A consensus approach was used to establish recommendations for individual secondary cancers. The most common sites include oral cavity, skin, breast and thyroid. Risks of cancers are increased after HCT compared with the general population in skin, thyroid, oral cavity, esophagus, liver, nervous system, bone and connective tissues. Myeloablative TBI, young age at HCT, chronic GVHD and prolonged immunosuppressive treatment beyond 24 months were well-documented risk factors for many types of secondary cancers. All HCT recipients should be advised of the risks of secondary cancers annually and encouraged to undergo recommended screening based on their predisposition. Here we propose guidelines to help clinicians in providing screening and preventive care for secondary cancers among HCT recipients.

Monitoring the kinetics of B-cell recovery following rituximab may guide the management of steroid-refractory chronic GvHD