1. Ethical Dilemmas Linked to Fragile X Testing of Minors—a Preliminary Survey Among Professionals
- Author
-
Annick Raas-Rothschild, Shahar Shefer, and Lidia V. Gabis
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,0301 basic medicine ,Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ,Fragile x ,Health Personnel ,Fragile X Mental Retardation Protein ,03 medical and health sciences ,Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience ,Sex Factors ,0302 clinical medicine ,Surveys and Questionnaires ,medicine ,Humans ,Family history ,Full mutation ,Genetic testing ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Genetic Carrier Screening ,General Medicine ,medicine.disease ,FMR1 ,Premature ovarian failure ,Minors ,Phenotype ,030104 developmental biology ,Neuropsychiatric disorder ,Fragile X Syndrome ,Childbearing age ,Female ,business ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery ,Clinical psychology - Abstract
Asymptomatic female carriers of the FMR1 premutation at childbearing age have been mostly identified through prenatal genetic testing, which is routinely proposed in Israel. During the last few years, a premutation phenotype in males and females has been defined-FXAND, including neuropsychiatric disorder, learning difficulties, endocrine dysfunction, and premature ovarian failure. So when a family at risk is identified, should individuals be tested for premutation even if minors? In order to understand what professionals' views are with regard to testing FMR1 premutation in minors, we performed a questionnaire testing both ethical attitudes and knowledge. Eighty-two percent of professionals would positively consider fragile X testing in minors, and an additional 15.4% would consider it in boys only. The specific phenotype of full mutation is recognized well by health professionals, while the premutation phenotype is not well known. There is a need to expand awareness on the fragile X premutation phenotype through better information. Testing of fragile X premutation status in minors should be considered, when at risk due to family history.
- Published
- 2020