Search

Venous disorders causing a permanent increase in venous pressure are by far the most frequent reason for ulcers of the lower extremity. With a prevalence of 1 % in the general population rising to 4 % in the elderly over 80 and its chronic character, 1 % of healthcare budgets of the western world are spent on treatment of venous ulcers. A thorough investigation of the underlying venous disorder is the prerequisite for a differenciated therapy. This should comprise elimination of venous reflux as well as local wound management. Chronic ulcers can successfully be treated by shave therapy and split skin grafting. Compression therapy is a basic measure not only in venous ulcer treatment but also in prevention of ulcer recurrence. Differential diagnosis which have to be considered are arterial ulcers, vasculitis and neoplasms.

The basis of surgery of great saphenous vein insufficiency is the concept of "privat circulation" coined by Trendelenburg in 1891. It was only logical that the dissection of the insuffcient vein or it's partial or complete resection could bring about healing. Over the years varicose vein stripping was modified to finally result in the highly effectiv concept of crossectomy and stripping. For decades this was the Goldstandard in surgery of varicose vein insufficiency. All the other minimally invasive therapeutic techniques which have been developed in the last decades had to compete with crossectomy and stripping. Thanks to progress in technical development the classic stripping procedure has been replaced by highly effectiv, minimally invasiv procedures, at least in the western industrialisied countries. For a minority of patients with specific anatomical pathologies as well as countries with limited health resources vein stripping remains a surgical standard procedure.

A prospective study was performed to compare the diagnostic potential of color-coded duplex sonography (CCDS) and that of ascending pressure phlebography (APP) in 61 patients before venous stripping. Varicosis of the long saphenous vein was correctly diagnosed and graded by CCDS in 87% of cases, and varicosis of the short saphenous vein in 97%. CCDS was inaccurate in 3 of 4 cases of recurrent varicosis of the long saphenous vein. Anterior femoral cutaneous varicosis (n = 3), mild postthrombotic syndrome (n = 1) and variant venous anatomy (n = 1) were not diagnosed on CCDS. One Baker cyst was diagnosed by CCDS. In the assessment of venous reflux CCDS seems to be superior to APP. Our results suggest that CCDS is a valuable diagnostic tool for routine imaging before venous stripping. However, patients with ambiguous or inconclusive CCDS results (eg. recurrent varicosis, venous variants) should be examined by APP.