Search

Introduction: Fast gut cutaneous sutures have become more prominent due to their low tissue reactivity, rapid absorption, and elimination of suture removal visits. It is not known how fast gut sutures compare to other closure modalities., Methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials comparing fast gut sutures to alternative closure methods during dermatologic surgery. Data collected included patient and physician assessed cosmetic outcome as well as standardized complication rates., Results: Six studies were included in final analysis and reported on 208 patients. Fast gut sutures were associated with lower physician opinions of final scar when compared to polypropylene sutures (SMD 0.438; 95% CI 0.082 to 0.794). No differences existed between physician opinion of fast gut sutures and cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive (SMD - 0.024; 95% CI - 0.605 to 0.556). Complications with fast gut suture placement were rare, and included infection, dehiscence, and hematomas. Fast gut sutures were less likely to experience wound dehiscence than tissue adhesive (p = 0.01)., Conclusion: If no contraindications to polypropylene sutures exist, they may provide superior cosmetic outcomes compared to fast gut sutures. Further research is required to better quantify cosmetic outcomes and optimal use of fast gut sutures., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Understanding patient non-adherence to prescribed antibiotics can inform clinical practices, patient counseling, and antibiotic efficacy study design in dermatology. The primary objective was to determine the rate of and reasons for antibiotic non-adherence in the dermatologic surgery setting. The secondary objective was to test the applicability of previously studied survey questions for antibiotic non-adherence screening in the dermatologic surgery setting. Five academic outpatient dermatologic surgery centers across the United States conducted one multicenter prospective cohort study. Dermatologic surgery patients ≥ 18 years of age who were prescribed an antibiotic were included as part of this study. 15.2% (42/276) of patients did not adhere to their antibiotic regimen after dermatologic surgery. Most common reasons for incomplete antibiotic courses included forgotten antibiotics (42.9%,18/42) and side effects (28.6%, 12/42). Previously evaluated questions to identify and predict non-adherence had modest performance in the dermatologic surgery setting (Area under the curve of 0.669 [95% CI (0.583-0.754)]). Antibiotic non-adherence after skin surgery is prevalent and commonly due to reasons that physicians can address with patients., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

The CAPER Registry is a voluntary, national safety reporting program that gathers patients' adverse events encountered during dermatologic procedures. This registry is intended as an aid for practitioners, patients, industry, and government regulators, and aims to facilitate safety monitoring for the specialty by identifying resource, process, education, and other systemic gaps associated with adverse events, as well as any potential risk factors for adverse events. CAPER will provide new or corroborating information to help dermatologists improve clinical practices, improve safety and effectiveness, and treat and prevent adverse events. The data generated will also help industry partners and regulatory bodies prevent adverse events from going unnoticed., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Undermining is thought to improve wound outcomes; however, randomized controlled data regarding its efficacy are lacking in humans. The objective of this randomized clinical trial was to determine whether undermining low to moderate tension wounds improves scar cosmesis compared to wound closure without undermining. Fifty-four patients, 18 years or older, undergoing primary linear closure of a cutaneous defect with predicted postoperative closure length of ≥ 3 cm on any anatomic site were screened. Four patients were excluded, 50 patients were enrolled, and 48 patients were seen in follow-up. Wounds were divided in half and one side was randomized to receive either no undermining or 2 cm of undermining. The other side received the unselected intervention. Three months, patients and 2 masked observers evaluated each scar using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS). A total of 50 patients [mean (SD) age, 67.6 (11.5) years; 31 (64.6%) male; 48 (100%) white] were enrolled in the study. The mean (SD) sum of the POSAS observer component scores was 12.0 (6.05) for the undermined side and 11.1 (4.68) for the non-undermined side (P = .60). No statistically significant difference was found in the mean (SD) sum of the patient component for the POSAS score between the undermined side [15.9 (9.07)] and the non-undermined side [13.33 (6.20)] at 3 months. For wounds under low to moderate perceived tension, no statistically significant differences in scar outcome or total complications were noted between undermined wound halves and non-undermined halves.Trail Registry: Clinical trials.gov Identifier NCT02289859. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02289859 ., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Cutaneous operations are generally safe procedures with minimal major risks. Excessive bleeding occasionally occurs, especially for patients taking antithrombotic medications. Conversely, stopping these medications before cutaneous surgery may increase the risk of a thromboembolic event. We aimed to synthesize the evidence regarding the risk of hemorrhage and thromboembolic events for patients undergoing cutaneous surgery while taking antithrombotic therapy. We performed a comprehensive search to identify randomized controlled trials and cohort studies that compared rates of hemorrhage and/or thromboembolic events between patients receiving antithrombotic therapy at cutaneous surgery and patients not receiving it. Odds ratio (OR) and risk difference for complications were calculated with random-effects models. Of 9214 patients taking anticoagulant or antiplatelet medications, 323 (3.5%) had hemorrhagic complications; of 21,696 control patients, 265 (1.2%) had hemorrhagic complications. Patients taking antithrombotic therapy had increased bleeding risk relative to control patients (OR 2.63 [95% CI 1.90-3.63]; P < 0.001) and an increased but less clinically important risk difference (OR 0.02 [95% CI 0.01-0.03]; P < 0.001) with high heterogeneity. No difference was observed in hemorrhage rates among patients whose antithrombotic therapy was stopped vs continued (OR 1.16 [95% CI 0.73-1.83]; P = 0.54). No difference was seen in rates of thromboembolic events among patients taking antithrombotic therapy vs control patients. However, two serious thromboembolic events were noted in a cohort of 59 patients whose antithrombotic therapy was stopped. Because of potentially devastating effects of thromboembolic events, the current accepted practice is indicated for continuation of antithrombotic therapy for patients undergoing cutaneous surgery., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

There has been an exponential growth in the number of dermatologic procedures performed over the past two decades. This surge in procedural volumes is accompanied by increasing utilization of local anesthetics. A proper technique in administering local anesthesia is necessary to minimize pain and promote comfort, as it is often regarded as the most painful part of cutaneous procedures. Pain is a psychophysiological phenomenon that involves attention, cognitive appraisal, and emotion. Sensory feedback and anxiety are two important aspects of pain perception. This article aims to introduce a novel way that minimizes pain and discomfort associated with local anesthetics. It is the authors' experience that painless injection is achievable by keeping syringes/needles out of sight, proceeding with injection without pre-procedure warning, and engaging patients in a conversation or simple tasks.

Over 2 million facial skin cancers occur globally each year. Facial skin cancer surgery can leave scars that may alter appearance and impact psychosocial functioning. The objective of this study is to assess patient-reported appearance-related psychosocial distress following facial skin cancer surgery, and to identify independent predictors of psychosocial impairment. This was a single-center, cross-sectional study at a tertiary care cancer center including patients who underwent dermatologic surgery on the face from March 1, 2016 to March 31, 2018. Patients completed the FACE-Q Skin Cancer Appearance-related Psychosocial Distress scale postoperatively between May 21, 2018 and October 1, 2018. Patient responses were rated on a 4-point Likert scale and converted on a scale from 0 to 100. In total, 359 patients completed the questionnaire (34.2% response rate). Overall, patients reported a low level of psychosocial distress. Patients most frequently reported items of self-consciousness, unhappiness, and insecurity < 3 months following surgery. Though psychosocial distress significantly improved over time, self-consciousness continued to be reported in the long-term postoperative period. Linear regression analysis determined that younger age, history of anxiety and/or depression, surgery on the nose, and repair by flap were independently predictive of psychosocial distress. Marginal predicted values for distress scores based on age demonstrated an indirect relationship. Patient-reported appearance-related psychosocial distress is low following facial skin cancer surgery, and report of distress decreases over time. The identified predictors of distress may be used as indicators for offering psycho-oncologic support and early interventions to improve scar appearance.

Argon plasma coagulation (APC) is an electrosurgical technique which can be used to ablate skin lesions with limited invasion depth into dermal tissue. Hence, APC might be well suited for the removal of epithelial tumours. However, there are no data on the effects of APC on human skin tissue. Thus, the aim of this study was to determine the extent of epidermal and dermal damage after APC of human skin. We performed APC ex-vivo on 91 freshly resected human skin samples, which were obtained after reconstructive surgical closures in actinically damaged areas. Tissue effects were evaluated histologically and compared across different power settings. Using 15, 30, and 45 W, median (interquartile range; IQR) coagulation depths were 110.0 µm (91.7-130.0), 113.3 µm (85.8-135.0), and 130.0 µm (100.0-153.3.0), respectively. Median (IQR) thickness of necrosis zone was 30.0 µm (23.3-40.0) at 15 W, 26.7 µm (20.0-41.6) at 30 W, and 43.3 µm (30.8-57.5) at 45 W. The Kruskal-Wallis test showed significant differences between 15 and 30 W versus 45 W for coagulation depth (P = 0.0414), necrosis zone (P = 0.0017), and necrosis according to overlaying epidermal thickness (P = 0.0467). In summary, APC is a simple and controllable electrosurgical technique to remove epidermal tissue with limited penetration to the dermis. Thus, APC is particularly suited for the ablation of epithelial skin lesions and, therefore, may serve as possible treatment approach for intraepithelial neoplasms such as actinic keratosis.

In recent decades, the portion of elderly has increased substantially due to demographic changes in developed countries. Dermatological surgery is particularly affected by this development, because a large proportion of the elderly suffer from skin tumors, which are primarily treated surgically. Physiological changes of age and multimorbidity, often associated with polypharmacy, present the treating physician with enormous challenges. What aspects of care are important? What must be considered? What are possible complications and how can they be prevented? These important questions are answered. Finally, selected surgical approaches for the care of very old patients are also described.

This article provides information on the clinical development of skin reactions after cryosurgery/cryotherapy and the indications, complications and contraindications of skin cryosurgery. Successful skin cryosurgery requires rapid freezing and slow thawing, minimum tissue temperature of -25 to -60℃ and, in malignant lesions, repetition of the freeze-thaw cycle. Frozen tissue reacts with peripheral erythema immediately after thawing, followed by edema, bulla formation, exudation and mumification. Lesions usually heal with a fine atrophic scar after approximately 4 weeks. Nowadays, cryosurgery is considered the treatment of choice in hypertrophic scars and keloids, granuloma annulare, small capillary infantile hemangioma and isolated actinic keratoses. It is also a valuable alternative therapy for various other skin diseases, including common warts, solar lentigo, superficial basal cell carcinoma and Kaposi's sarcoma. Cryosurgery is a safe regimen with relatively few adverse effects and contraindications. Pain during and/or shortly after treatment, bulla formation and local edema are the major temporary adverse effects; lesional hypopigmentation and/or peripheral hyperpigmentation is the most common long-term complication.

In Germany, over half a million operations are done in dermatologic surgery in a hospital setting every year, as well as a less well quantified number of procedures in private offices. In spite of this large number, specific guidelines concerning the use of perioperative antibiotics in dermatologic surgery are sparse. In contrast to procedures in general, visceral or gynecological surgery, general guidelines on perioperative antibiotics issued by the Paul-Ehrlich Institutes and the AWMF do not specifically consider dermatologic operations. Several surveys indicate that familiarity with current recommendations on perioperative antibiotics is suboptimal and resulted in a considerable overuse of perioperative antibiotics in dermatologic surgery. Given the increasing antimicrobial resistance among important pathogens and the inherent risks of antibiotic administration, the decision for the use of prophylactic antibiotics should be based on the individual risk profile of the patient and of the surgical procedure. In the following, we will critically discuss the evidence for perioperative antibiotics in dermatologic surgery.

Background: Local anaesthesia often is insufficient for more extensive procedures. Instead of general anaesthesia or sedation, pediatricians, gynaecologists and dentists increasingly use nitrous oxide (N2O). This study evaluates the suitability of this form of anesthesia in dermatology., Patients and Methods: In 24 patients (18 w, 6 m, mean age 49 y.) N2O/O2 inhalation (Livopan®) was used during 46 procedures with indications including fractional RF/wrinkle reduction, IPL/rosacea, q-sw. laser/tattoos and hemosiderosis as well as fractional Er:Glass laser for scars and hypopigmentation. In 26 procedures subjective pain intensity was measured (visual analogue scale 0-10)., Results: With N2O the treatment pain was lowered from 6.6 ± 1.6 to 2.9 ± 1.7 (median, p = 0.000). 23/24 patients chose N2O for their next treatment. Beside euphoria, fatigue, slight drowsiness, dizziness, nausea or change in auditory perception, no other side effects occurred., Conclusion: The pronounced analgesia, the easy self-administration, the fast onset and complete recovery after a few minutes and the low ratio of side effects make the N2O/O2 inhalation to an ideal addendum in the management of larger painful procedures in dermatology as long as contraindications and safety precautions are respected.

Aesthetic medicine has become increasingly popular in the last two decades. The same trend has occurred in dermatology. Aesthetic dermatology prefers minimally invasive procedures. Nevertheless, even these procedures are not free of possible adverse effects. The spectrum of possible adverse effects, their management and prevention are discussed for four popular procedures in aesthetic dermatology, i.e. chemical peels, mesotherapy, botulinum toxin, and dermal fillers. Aesthetic procedures should only be performed by well-educated, well-trained medical doctors with an excellent medical background, never by lay persons.

The possible treatment errors and complications with the use of laser and non-laser light sources are presented along with corresponding preventive measures. Particular emphasis is laid on practice-related errors and how to avoid them. A checklist for the safe conduct of treatments using laser and non-laser light sources completes the article.