Search

Immunocompromised patients are at high risk of invasive fungal infections (IFI), in particular those with haematological malignancies undergoing remission-induction chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and recipients of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCT). Despite the development of new treatment options in the past decades, IFI remains a concern due to substantial morbidity and mortality in these patient populations. In addition, the increasing use of new immune modulating drugs in cancer therapy has opened an entirely new spectrum of at risk periods. Since the last edition of antifungal prophylaxis recommendations of the German Society for Haematology and Medical Oncology in 2014, seven clinical trials regarding antifungal prophylaxis in patients with haematological malignancies have been published, comprising 1227 patients. This update assesses the impact of this additional evidence and effective revisions. Our key recommendations are the following: prophylaxis should be performed with posaconazole delayed release tablets during remission induction chemotherapy for AML and MDS (AI). Posaconazole iv can be used when the oral route is contraindicated or not feasible. Intravenous liposomal amphotericin B did not significantly decrease IFI rates in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) patients during induction chemotherapy, and there is poor evidence to recommend it for prophylaxis in these patients (CI). Despite substantial risk of IFI, we cannot provide a stronger recommendation for these patients. There is poor evidence regarding voriconazole prophylaxis in patients with neutropenia (CII). Therapeutic drug monitoring TDM should be performed within 2 to 5 days of initiating voriconazole prophylaxis and should be repeated in case of suspicious adverse events or of dose changes of interacting drugs (BIItu). General TDM during posaconazole prophylaxis is not recommended (CIItu), but may be helpful in cases of clinical failure such as breakthrough IFI for verification of compliance or absorption.

Infectious complications after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT) remain a clinical challenge. This is a guideline provided by the AGIHO (Infectious Diseases Working Group) of the DGHO (German Society for Hematology and Medical Oncology). A core group of experts prepared a preliminary guideline, which was discussed, reviewed, and approved by the entire working group. The guideline provides clinical recommendations for the preventive management including prophylactic treatment of viral, bacterial, parasitic, and fungal diseases. The guideline focuses on antimicrobial agents but includes recommendations on the use of vaccinations. This is the updated version of the AGHIO guideline in the field of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation utilizing methods according to evidence-based medicine criteria.

Invasive fungal infections cause substantial morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients, particularly in those with haematological malignancies and recipients of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Difficulties in diagnosing invasive fungal infections and subsequent delays in treatment initiation lead to unfavourable outcomes and emphasise the importance of prophylaxis. Since the recommendations of the Infectious Diseases Working Party of the German Society for Haematology and Oncology in 2009, results of 14 additional clinical studies have been published comprising 2,899 patients and initiating this update. Key recommendations for adult patients are as follows: Posaconazole remains the drug of choice during remission-induction chemotherapy in acute myeloid leukaemia, myelodysplastic syndrome and allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation with graft versus host disease (AI). In the pre-engraftment period of allogeneic transplantation, several antifungals are appropriate and can be recommended with equal strength: voriconazole (BI), micafungin (BI), fluconazole (BI) and posaconazole (BII). There is poor evidence regarding antifungal prophylaxis in the post-engraftment period of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation if no steroids for treatment of graft versus host disease are required. Aerosolised liposomal amphotericin B inhalation in conjunction with fluconazole can be used in patients with prolonged neutropenia (BII).

The Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society of Hematology and Oncology (DGHO) here presents its updated recommendations for the treatment of documented fungal infections. Invasive fungal infections are a main cause of morbidity and mortality in cancer patients undergoing intensive chemotherapy regimens. In recent years, new antifungal agents have been licensed, and agents already approved have been studied in new indications. The choice of the most appropriate antifungal treatment depends on the fungal species suspected or identified, the patient's risk factors (e.g., length and depth of neutropenia), and the expected side effects. This guideline reviews the clinical studies that served as a basis for the following recommendations. All recommendations including the levels of evidence are summarized in tables to give the reader rapid access to the information.

More than 18,000 autolgous transplantation were performed in Europe in the year 2009. It as a routine procedure in experienced centres. Even if there is a low mortality rate, infections are a major issue after transplantation, occurring in more than 60 % of the patients. In this review we discuss all aspects of infections after autologous stem transplantation, including epidemiology, diagnostics, therapeutic algorithms, prophylaxis and supportive therapy.

Invasive fungal infections are a main cause of morbidity and mortality in cancer patients undergoing intensive chemotherapy regimens. Early antifungal treatment is mandatory to improve survival. Today, a number of effective and better-tolerated but more expensive antifungal agents compared to the former gold standard amphotericin B deoxycholate are available. Clinical decision-making must consider results from numerous studies and published guidelines, as well as licensing status and cost pressure. New developments in antifungal prophylaxis improving survival rates result in a continuous need for actualization. The treatment options for invasive Candida infections include fluconazole, voriconazole, and amphotericin B and its lipid formulations, as well as echinocandins. Voriconazole, amphotericin B, amphotericin B lipid formulations, caspofungin, itraconazole, and posaconazole are available for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis. Additional procedures, such as surgical interventions, immunoregulatory therapy, and granulocyte transfusions, have to be considered. The Infectious Diseases Working Party of the German Society of Hematology and Oncology here presents its 2008 recommendations discussing the dos and do-nots, as well as the problems and possible solutions, of evidence criteria selection.

As antifungal agents are frequently used in hematology and oncology, economic data on the empirical therapy of suspected systemic fungal infection are pivotal. Data were analyzed according to: (1) the rate of nephrotoxicity related to treatment with caspofungin in comparison to liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) from a randomized clinical trial, (2) the effect of nephrotoxicity on length of hospital stay from a European observational study, and (3) an example of total bottom-up cost in a department of hematology in Germany. All estimates include 95% confidence intervals (CI) using two-stage Monte Carlo simulation on binominal and Gaussian random variables from separate studies with comparable populations. Overall, 8.9 (95% CI 5.9-12.1) fewer patients (of 100 randomized) experienced worsening of renal function with caspofungin vs L-AmB, giving a number needed to treat for one patient to be harmed by L-AmB of 12 (95% CI 8-17). This was estimated to translate into 5.3 extra days in hospital (95% CI 1.6-9.1) per event or 0.48 days (95% CI 0.14-0.88) worth 298 euro (95% CI 89-554) per patient receiving L-AmB rather than caspofungin. From the hospital perspective, use of caspofungin was estimated to be cost-neutral compared to L-AmB at a per diem total hospital cost of 428 euro with, and 1284 euro without, consideration of supplementary reimbursement (Zusatzentgelt) of both L-AmB and caspofungin. The data presented in this scenario show that use of caspofungin in hematology-oncology departments in Germany results in shorter hospital stays and is at least cost-neutral compared to use of L-AmB.

In patients undergoing allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplantation after reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC), graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) represents a major cause of morbidity and mortality. T-cell depletion (TCD) prevents GVHD but carries potential risks of graft failure, opportunistic infections, and disease relapse. We explored ex vivo TCD of stem cell allografts that were administered after RIC treatment. Thirteen high-risk patients with hematological malignancies were treated with a fludarabine/melphalan-based RIC regimen followed by transplantation of immunomagnetically selected CD34(+) PBSC from HLA-identical sibling or matched unrelated donors. Patients were sequentially enrolled in two cohorts: group A (n=6) received antithymocyte globulin (ATG) during conditioning and 10(5) donor T cells/kg at transplantation, while group B (n=7) received 10(6) donor T cells/kg without ATG pretreatment. Primary graft failure occurred in two patients of group A and in one patient of group B. Complete donor chimerism persisting more than 1 year was achieved in two cases per cohort. Acute grade II to IV or chronic extensive GVHD were observed in a total of six patients (group A, 2; group B, 4). Procedure-related deaths were mainly due to severe pneumonia occurring in two patients of group A and in five patients of group B. These results suggest that CD34 selection of reduced-intensity PBSC allografts may cause adverse effects upon specific antimicrobial immunity which can lead to fatal infections, particularly in high-risk patients. In our study, simultaneous add-back of < or =10(6)/kg donor T cells was unable to compensate for this deficiency.

Invasive fungal infections are associated with a high morbidity and mortality. They are of growing concern and a severe infectious complication in cancer patients treated with intensive chemotherapy. Within the last five years substantial progress has been demonstrated for non-culture based diagnostics and treatment of invasive fungal infections. Recent developments in the epidemiology, diagnostics and treatment of fungal infections are reviewed and discussed in the context of the current state of art for the management of invasive fungal infections in cancer patients.

Vaccinations are safe and effective in immunocompromised patients. Apparently most vaccines in this patient population are underutilized. General vaccination recommendations are expressed for influenza, diphtheria and tetanus. Pneumococcal, meningococcal und Haemophilus influenzae B immunizations are specially indicated for patients with or developing B-cell-deficiency. Live attenuated vaccines are usually contraindicated. The efficacy of the immunization and its indication can be additionally measured by antibody response, which is usually decreased compared to healthy subjects. Immunocompromised hosts with cancer will benefit from consistent immunization practices. Further clinical trials are urgently warranted.

During recent years the therapeutic indications of monoclonal antibodies are on the increase. Most monoclonal antibodies are immunosuppressants. Thus, therapeutic successes are accompanied by an increase of serious infections. Closest cooperation between the haematologist/oncologist and the infectious diseases specialist is a prerequisite for the successful outcome of treatment of the individual patient. Rituximab and alemtuzumab especially pave the way for a variety of opportunistic infections. Prophylactic drugs directed against bacterial infections and invasive fungal infections have not been proven to be useful. Although the efficacy of prophylactic cotrimoxazole against Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia has not been thoroughly examined in this setting, it is usually given at a dose of two double-strength tablets every other day. Whether reactivation of herpes simplex and varizella zoster can be influenced prophylactically has not been studied in randomised trials. In case of fever and detection of cytomegalovirus reactivation preemptive therapy should be given.

The Infectious Diseases Working Party of the German Society of Haematology and Oncology presents their guidelines for the treatment of fungal infections in patients with hematological and oncological malignancies. These guidelines are evidence-based, considering study results, case reports and expert opinions, using the evidence criteria of the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA). The recommendations for major fungal complications in this setting are summarized here. The primary choice of therapy for chronic candidiasis should be fluconazole, reserving caspofungin or amphotericin B (AmB) for use in case of progression of the Candida infection. Patients with candidemia (except C. krusei or C. glabrata) who are in a clinically stable condition without previous azole prophylaxis should receive fluconazole, otherwise AmB or caspofungin. Voriconazole is recommended for the first-line treatment of invasive aspergillosis. The benefit of a combination of AmB and 5-flucytosine has not been demonstrated except in patients with cryptococcal meningitis. Mucormycosis is relatively rare. The drug therapy of choice consists of AmB, desoxycholate or liposomal formulation, in the highest tolerable dosage. Additional surgical intervention has been shown to achieve a lower fatality rate than with antifungal therapy alone. The role of interventional strategies, cytokines/G-CSF, and granulocyte transfusions in invasive fungal infections are further reviewed. These guidelines offer actual standards and discussions on the treatment of oropharyngeal and esophageal candidiasis, invasive candidiasis, cryptococcosis and mould infections.

The risk of infection after allogeneic stem cell transplantation is determined by the underlying disease, the intensity of previous treatments and complications that may have occurred during that time, but above all, the risk of infection is determined by the selected transplantation modality (e.g. HLA-match between the stem cell donor and recipient, T cell depletion of the graft, and others). In comparison with patients treated with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation, patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation are at a much higher risk of infection even after hematopoietic reconstitution, due to the delayed recovery of T and B cell functions. The rate at which immune function recovers after hematopoietic reconstitution greatly influences the incidence and type of post-transplant infectious complications. Infection-associated mortality, for example, is significantly higher following engraftment than during the short neutropenic period that immediately follows transplantation.

Morbidity and mortality in patients with malignancies, especially leukemia and lymphoma, are increased by invasive fungal infections. Since diagnosis of invasive fungal infection is often delayed, antifungal prophylaxis is an attractive approach for patients expecting prolonged neutropenia. Antifungal prophylaxis has obviously attracted much interest resulting in dozens of clinical trials since the late 1970s. The non-absorbable polyenes are probably ineffective in preventing invasive fungal infections, but may reduce superficial mycoses. Intravenous amphotericin B and the newer azoles were used in clinical trials, but their role in antifungal prophylaxis is still not well defined. Allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients are at particularly high risk for invasive fungal infections. Other well described risk factors are neutropenia >10 days, corticosteroid therapy, sustained immunosuppression, graft versus host disease, and concomitant viral infections. The enormous study efforts are contrasted by a scarcity of risk stratified evidence based recommendations for clinical decision making. The objective of this review accumulating information on about 10.000 patients is to assess evidence based criteria primarily regarding the efficacy of antifungal prophylaxis in neutropenic cancer patients.