1. Ocrelizumab and ofatumumab comparison: an Italian real-world propensity score matched study.
- Author
-
Zanghì A, Borriello G, Bonavita S, Fantozzi R, Signoriello E, Barone S, Abbadessa G, Cellerino M, Ziccone V, Miele G, Lus G, Valentino P, Bucello S, Inglese M, Centonze D, Avolio C, and D'Amico E
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Female, Italy, Adult, Retrospective Studies, Middle Aged, Treatment Outcome, Antibodies, Monoclonal adverse effects, Antibodies, Monoclonal therapeutic use, Follow-Up Studies, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized therapeutic use, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized adverse effects, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized administration & dosage, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized pharmacology, Propensity Score, Immunologic Factors pharmacology, Immunologic Factors administration & dosage, Immunologic Factors adverse effects, Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting drug therapy
- Abstract
Background: The management of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) has undergone transformative evolution with the introduction of high-efficacy disease-modifying therapies (DMTs), specifically anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, such as ocrelizumab (OCR) and ofatumumab (OFA)., Materials and Methods: This is an independent retrospective cohort study in Relapsing MS (RMS) patients followed at eight Italian MS centers who initiated treatment with OCR or OFA in the participating centers and with at least 12 months on therapy. A generalized linear regression model inverse probability of treatment weight (IPTW) PS-adjusted was performed to evaluate the relationship between annualized relapse rate (ARR) and treatment groups. No evidence of disease activity-NEDA-3 at 12-month score was also collected. Safety profile of the investigated DMTs was recorded., Results: A total cohort of 396 RMS patients fulfilled the required criteria and were enrolled in the study. Out of them, 216 had a prescription of OCR and 180 of OFA. The mean follow-up was 13.2 ± 1.9 months. The estimated means for ARR did not show differences between the two groups, 0.059 for patients on OCR and 0.038 for patients on OFA (p = 0.185). The generalized regression model IPTW PS-adjusted did not reveal differences between patients on OCR and OFA (ExpB
OFA 0.974, 95%CI 934-1.015, p = 0.207). NEDA-3 at 12 months was experienced by 199(92.1%) patients on OCR and 170(94.4%) patients on OFA (p = 0.368). Generally, both therapies exhibit good tolerability., Conclusions: The treatment with OCR and OFA resulted in comparable control of disease activity with good safety profile. Our results need further validation in larger multicentre studies with long-term follow-up., (© 2024. The Author(s).)- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF