Search

The reverse transcription of RNA in DNA is responsible for the generation of large families of repetitive sequences called retroposons or non-LTR retrotransposons. Recent reports established that the integration of mammalian SINE and LINE retroposons occurs at nonrandom staggered breaks, probably resulting from the action of a LINE-encoded endonuclease (Feng et al. 1996; Jurka 1997; Jurka et al. 1998). We report here that plant SINE S1 retroposons also integrate at nonrandom staggered breaks. One of the two nicks involved in S1 integration is associated mainly with the 5'-Y/AAANNNG-3' motif. The other nick at opposite DNA strand occurs preferably within 14-16 bp, a situation also observed for mammalian retroposons, but is not associated with any specific motif. Further studies on the distribution of dinucleotides surrounding the two nicking sites showed that, as for mammalian retroposons, S1 retroposons integrate at sites rich in TA, CA, and TG dinucleotides. These dinucleotides were reported as specific DNA sites where special DNA structures called "kinks" may occur under bending constraints. Nicking sites are preceded by peaks in frequency of di-pyrimidine followed by peaks of di-purine. These results suggest that the general A/T richness of a given DNA region and the presence of short runs of pyrimidines followed by short runs of purines could represent a favorable context for the integration of retroposons. In such a context, an endonuclease upon fixation could be able to generate the kink at the pyrimidine/purine transition and to nick the DNA. The similarities in target site selection observed for plant and mammalian retroposons suggest that retroposition is a surprisingly well conserved process.

The identification of a family of SINE retroposons dispersed in the genome of oilseed rape Brassica napus has provided the basis for an evolutionary analysis of retroposition in plants. The repetitive elements (called S1Bn) are 170 bp long and occupy roughly 500 loci by haploid genome. They present characteristic features of SINE retroposons such as a 3' terminal A-rich region, two conserved polymerase III motifs (box A and B), flanking direct repeats of variable sizes, and a primary and secondary sequence homology to several tRNA species. A consensus sequence was made from the alignment of 34 members of the family. The retroposon population was divided into five subfamilies based on several correlated sets of mutations from the consensus. These precise separations in subfamilies based on "diagnostic" mutations and the random distribution of mutations observed inside each subfamily are consistent with the master sequence model proposed for the dispersion of mammalian retroposons. An independent analysis of each subfamily provides strong evidence for the coexpression of at least three subfamily master sequences (SMS). In contrast to mammalian retroposition, diagnostic positions are not shared between SMS. We therefore propose that SMS were all derived from a general master sequence (GMS) and independently activated for retroposition after a variable period of random drift. Possible models for plant retroposition are discussed.

In a recent report mouse B1 genomic repeats were divided into six families representing different waves of fixation of B1 variants, consistent with the retroposition model of human Alu elements. These data are used to examine the distribution of nucleotide substitutions in individual genomic repeats with respect to family consensus sequences and to compare the minimal energy structures of the corresponding B1 RNAs. By an enzymatic approach the predicted structure of B1 RNAs is experimentally confirmed using as a model sequence an RNA of a young B1 family member transcribed in vitro by T7 RNA polymerase. B1 RNA preserves folding domains of the Alu fragment of 7SL RNA, its progenitor molecule. Our results reveal similarities among 7SL-like retroposons, human Alu, and rodent B1 repeats, and relate the evolutionary conservation of B1 family consensus sequences to selection at the RNA level.