Search

The mortality rate in susceptible populations of horses during an epizootic of African horse sickness (AHS) may be in excess of 90%. Rapid and reliable assays are therefore essential for the confirmation of clinical diagnoses and to enable control strategies to be implemented without undue delay. One of the major objectives of a recent European Union funded project was the validation of newly developed diagnostic assays which are rapid, sensitive, highly reproducible and inexpensive, for the detection of African horse sickness virus (AHSV) antigens and antibodies. The Laboratorio de Sanidad y Produccion Animal (LSPA) in Algete, Spain was charged with the responsibility of co-ordinating and supplying samples of viruses and antisera to the participating laboratories in Spain, France and the United Kingdom. The panels comprised 76 antigen samples for assay by indirect sandwich ELISAs and 53 serum samples for antibody detection by either indirect or competitive ELISAs. Results generated by ELISA for each laboratory were analysed in LSPA in terms of their relative sensitivities and specificities. There was a good agreement between the ELISAs used for either antigen or antibody detection. The participating groups agreed that any field sample giving a doubtful result would always be retested by ELISA and an alternative assay.

Two groups, comprising 4 donkeys and 4 mules (group 1) and 4 donkeys and 3 mules (group 2), were used to determine the duration of viraemia and to monitor the development of antibodies following inoculation with African horse sickness virus (AHSV). One group of animals was given a single dose of attenuated AHSV serotype 4 (AHSV 4) vaccine. The second group was inoculated with a virulent field strain of AHSV 4. Both groups were subsequently challenged with the virulent field strain of AHSV 4, 51 and 58 days, respectively, after their primary inoculation. Blood and serum samples, collected on alternate days after the primary inoculations and also after subsequent challenge, were assayed for virus and antibodies. Seven of the 8 AHSV vaccinated (group 1) and 7 of the 7 AHSV inoculated (group 2) animals showed humoral antibody responses after primary inoculation. Although no infectious virus could be isolated from either group for the duration of the study, reverse transcription-PCR data obtained for the second group did show the presence of AHSV viral RNA from as early as day 5 in mules and day 9 in donkeys after the primary inoculation. Viral RNA was detected consistently up to day 47 in some animals and intermittently thereafter. There was no evidence of a second viraemia in any of the animals after challenge. The detection of specific antibodies, against AHSV 4 NS3 protein, in all animals confirmed that both donkeys and mules were infected and that the virus had replicated.

An established mouse model system was used to evaluate the effectiveness of the major outer core protein VP7 of African horse sickness virus (AHSV) serotype 9 as a subunit vaccine. Balb C mice were immunised with VP7 crystals purified from AHSV infected BHK cells. In groups of mice, each of which was immunised with > or = 1.5 micrograms of the protein in Freund's adjuvant, > or = 80% of mice survived challenge with a virulent strain of a heterologous AHSV serotype (AHSV 7), that killed > or = 80% of the mice in the uninoculated control groups. This level of protection was significantly greater than that observed in mice inoculated with equivalent amounts of either denatured VP7 (50% survival), or GST/VP7 fusion protein (50-70% survival), or which were vaccinated with AHSV 9 (40-50% survival). The VP7 protein folding, or its assembly into crystals, are thought to play some role in the effectiveness of the protective response observed. Titres of circulating antibodies against AHSV VP7 were determined by competitive ELISA but did not appear to correlate with the levels of protection observed. Passive transfer of these antibodies to syngeneic recipients also failed to protect Balb C mice from the AHSV 7 challenge. The observed protection is therefore unlikely to be due to an antibody mediated immune response.

African horse sickness virus (AHSV) antigen was demonstrated immunohistochemically in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections of tissues collected from three ponies suffering from the peracute form of the disease and from one pony affected by the fever form. The pattern of the antigen distribution indicated a particular organ tropism characterised by an accumulation of AHSV antigen in cardio-pulmonary tissues of the animals with the peracute disease and in the spleen of the pony with the fever form. AHSV antigen was identified in endothelial cells of small blood vessels, particularly capillaries and in large mono-nuclear cells resembling macrophages or reticular cells of lymphatic tissues. Occasional circulating mononuclear cells with the morphology of monocytes were also positively stained within the larger vessels. The immunohistochemical results confirm earlier work suggesting that AHSV may have different tropisms to particular organs during various forms of the disease and that different target cell populations exist in vivo. Immunohistochemistry may be an additional useful method for diagnostic and research purposes in AHS.

A coupled reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assay (RT-PCR) for the detection of African horse sickness virus (AHSV) dsRNA, has been developed using genome segment 7 as the target template for primers. RNA from isolates of all nine AHSV serotypes were readily detected. The potential inhibitory effects of either ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid (EDTA) or heparin on the RT-PCR were eliminated by washing blood samples before lysis of the red blood cells and storage. There was a close agreement in the sensitivity and the specificity of the RT-PCR and an indirect sandwich ELISA. Confirmation of the presence of AHSV using RT-PCR and dot-blot hybridization on blood samples collected from horses experimentally infected with AHSV serotype 4 (AHSV 4) and AHSV serotype 9 (AHSV 9), was achieved within 24 hours, compared to the period of several days required for virus isolation. The RT-PCR and virus isolation methods showed similar levels of sensitivity when used for the detection of AHSV in 3 horses infected with AHSV 4, and in 2 out of 3 horses infected with a less virulent isolate of AHSV 9. Although viraemia was detected in the third horse by virus isolation, from 6 to 14 days after infection, this animal remained consistently negative by RT-PCR. Conversely, AHSV viral RNA was detected by RT-PCR in the blood of 4 donkeys and 4 mules up to 55 days after their experimental infection despite the absence of any detectable infectious virus. RT-PCR is a sensitive and rapid method for detecting AHSV nucleic acids during either the incubation period at the start of an African horse sickness (AHS) epizootic, or for epidemiological investigations in species where clinical signs may be inapparent.

Investigations have been carried out to elucidate the possible role of the donkey in the epidemiology of African horse sickness (AHS). These studies have shown that despite the absence of pyrexia or other observable clinical signs, donkeys become infected with virulent AHS virus serotype 4 (AHSV 4) and that they develop a viraemia which can persist for at least 12 days, albeit at a comparatively lower titre than that recorded for similarly infected ponies. AHSV 4 showed a similar tissue tropism in the pony and donkey but the virus appeared to replicate less efficiently in donkey tissues. The only gross pathological changes observed in the donkeys post mortem were increased fluid accumulation in the serosal lined compartments, particularly the peritoneal cavity, and petechial and ecchymotic haemorrhages on the left hepatic ligament. The absence of infectious virus or viral antigens in any of the tissues collected at 14 and 19 days post inoculation (dpi) from 6 experimental donkeys suggest that, though susceptible to infection, the donkey is unlikely to be a long term reservoir for AHSV. Although AHSV 4 was detected in all 6 donkeys following the primary inoculation, no virus could be isolated from blood collected from two donkeys subsequently challenged with a second virulent virus, AHSV 5. Data generated from virus neutralisation tests showed a second primary antibody response, against AHSV 5, in these donkeys at 12 dpi. In contrast, the boost in antibody levels detected from 5 dpi, as measured by ELISA, was probably due to an anamnestic response against the AHSV group-specific viral proteins. Homogenised spleen tissue, collected post mortem from a donkey 7 dpi with AHSV 4, caused a lethal, cardiac form of AHS when inoculated into a susceptible pony.