Search

Background: Mesotherapy is a medical technique that administers cosmetic nutrients directly to the dermis through microdrop injections for aesthetic purposes. Its application has become increasingly widespread. However, there have also been a growing number of reported cases of multiple foreign body granulomas following mesotherapy. It is crucial to find an effective and safe treatment., Methods: In this study, 31 patients with facial foreign body granuloma after mesotherapy were included. A mixture of 5-fluorouracil, lidocaine injection , and normal saline was prepared in a ratio of 1:1:4 and injected subcutaneously. Triamcinolone acetonide, 5-fluorouracil, lidocaine injection, and normal saline were prepared in a ratio of 2:5:3:10. Subcutaneous injections were administered to each papule using a 34G needle. The treatments were scheduled at intervals of 10-14 days. Color Doppler ultrasound was used to evaluate the condition before the initial treatment and after the final treatment., Results: The preoperative ultrasonography revealed diffuse hypoechoic areas in the dermis of the facial skin. After an average of 2-4 treatment sessions, a significant improvement was observed in all patients' appearance, with reduced redness and swelling, softened nodules, absence of pain and itching symptoms, and no evident abnormal echo on ultrasound examination. During a follow-up period ranging from 1 to 8 months, no recurrence or adverse reactions were reported., Conclusion: This technique demonstrates clear efficacy. And this formulation effectively reduces the dosage of triamcinolone acetonide and minimizes the risk of adverse reactions such as skin atrophy. Therefore, it can be considered an effective treatment for multiple foreign body granulomas following mesotherapy., Level of Evidence Iv: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 ., (© 2024. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.)

Background: Autologous fat grafting is a common treatment for tear trough deformities. This procedure involves a potential complication of fat nodule formation, leading to abnormal bulging of the lower eyelid. However, limited information exists about this complication, and an effective treatment is lacking. The present study aimed to present a novel surgical approach for the removal of fat nodules caused by autologous fat grafting in the tear trough., Methods: This retrospective study included 33 patients who underwent surgery for the removal of fat nodules formed after autologous fat grafting. The procedure was performed using a conjunctival approach, allowing exposure and removal of all fat nodules in the anterior septal space, with the method adapted according to the severity of the deformity., Results: A total of 66 eyelids were treated surgically, including 30 (45.45%) with mild nodular deformity, 23 (34.85%) with moderate nodular deformity, and 13 (10.70%) with severe nodular deformity. A second surgical procedure was required on 3 eyelids (4.56%). The main complications of the surgery were conjunctival congestion (21.21%), and localized depression (18.18%), bruising (12.12%). Among the patients, 29 (87.88%) were satisfied and 4 (12.12%) were dissatisfied with the treatment results., Conclusion: Conjunctival approach surgery is an effective method of removing fat nodules formed after autologous fat grafting in the tear trough, with good results and high levels of patient satisfaction. This approach enables the effective management of a common complication of autologous fat grafting and may enable the wider application of autologous fat grafting in the periorbital region., Level of Evidence Iii: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 ., (© 2024. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.)

Background: In recent years, soft tissue materials have been applied as forehead fillers. Some filling materials need to be removed or refilled in a timely manner in certain situations; therefore, it is important to develop a method to identify the location and type of filling materials. This study summarizes the imaging findings of different filling materials under high-frequency ultrasound, providing a reference for clinical treatment., Methods: We screened facial ultrasound images performed at the Plastic Surgery Hospital of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences from April 2015 to July 2023 and classified and summarized the types of frontal filling materials and their imaging results., Results: This study included ultrasound imaging results from 114 patients, including 39 with hyaluronic acid (HA) filling, 45 with polyacrylamide hydrogel (PAG) filling, 14 who received autologous fat transplantation, 2 who received prosthesis implantation, 2 who received both HA and PAG filling, and 12 who received silicone oil filling. HA mainly manifests as an anechoic zone on ultrasonography, with images divisible into four types. PAG primarily presents as fine punctate echoes, divisible into five types. Fat transplantation presents as a low-echo area with uneven density, divisible into five types. Finally, the silicone oil-filling material appears as a cloud-like high echo on the forehead, visible throughout the entire skin layer, and unclear imaging in deep tissues., Conclusion: High-frequency ultrasound is a safe and reliable method to evaluate the type and position of forehead filling materials, which can be easily applied in clinical practice., Level of Evidence Iv: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 ., (© 2024. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.)

Background: Thread-lifting (TL) is a minimally-invasive technique for facial rejuvenation, whereas liposuction is commonly used for facial contouring. This retrospective cohort study aims to introduce and evaluate a novel technique that combines liposuction and thread-lifting for mid-lower facial rejuvenation., Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent TL for mid-lower facial rejuvenation from May 2016 to May 2021 were divided into thread-lifting group (TL group) or thread-lifting plus liposuction group (TLL group) according to whether liposuction was performed adjunctively. The co-primary outcomes were the changes between the preoperative and 6-month postoperative Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) and Facial Aging Evaluation Scale (FAES)., Results: A total of 185 patients (184 females) with an average age of 34.5±5.5 years were included. There were no significant differences in patients' age, number of threads, and preoperative WSRS and FAES between the two groups. The TLL group (n = 128) had significantly lower postoperative WSRS (1.5±0.6 vs. 1.8±0.8, p<0.001) and FAES (2.5±1.4 vs. 3.8±2.1, p<0.001) than the TL group (n = 57). The decrease in WSRS (0.8±0.6 vs. 0.2±0.7, p<0.001) and FAES (2.7±1.3 vs. 1.6±1.6, p<0.001) were greater in the TLL group. Only 3.8% patients experienced slight side effects and totally recovered., Conclusions: The combination of TL and liposuction is an effective and safe technique for simultaneous contour improvement and facial rejuvenation in middle-aged East Asian females., Level of Evidence Ii: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors https://www.springer.com/00266 ., (© 2024. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.)

Background: Various dermal fillers are often used for nasolabial groove filling. High-frequency ultrasonography might be a valuable tool for assessing facial filler materials., Methods: The facial ultrasound images of plastic surgery hospital of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences from November 2014 to November 2021 were analyzed and judged., Results: A total of 94 patients who underwent high-frequency ultrasound with a nasolabial groove filler were included in the study. Hyaluronic acid was detected in 35 cases, polyacrylamide in 34 cases, lipofilling in 10 cases, silicon oil in seven cases, calcium hydroxyapatite in six cases, and silicone implant in two cases. The ultrasonic performance of hyaluronic acid was divided into four types: aggregation, diffusion, mixed pattern, and associated infection; of polyacrylamide was divided into five types: aggregation and inclusion, aggregation and non-inclusion, diffusion, mixed pattern, and associated infection; and of lipofilling was divided into four types: aggregation, diffusion, fat liquefaction necrosis, and cystic change. Echo intensity, echo characteristics, boundary clarity, fluidity, and blood flow signals can be used as the basis for identifying filler materials., Conclusion: High-frequency ultrasound has an identification significance for the filling materials in the area of nasolabial groove., Level of Evidence Iv: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 ., (© 2022. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.)

Background: In recent years, the use of mental injectable soft tissue fillers is popular. However, some fillers are difficult to distinguish from pathological tissue, and some non-absorbable fillers need to be removed in time. Therefore, identification of different fillers is important. In this study, we summarized the ultrasonic manifestations of different mental injectable soft tissue fillers to provide references for clinical practice., Methods: We screened the mental ultrasound images from November 2014 to November 2021 in the Plastic Surgery Hospital of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, identified different filling injection materials, and summarized and classified the ultrasonic characteristics of each filling material., Results: A total of 244 cases were included, involving 62 cases of hyaluronic acid, 126 cases of polyacrylamide hydrogel, 19 cases of growth factor, 16 cases of calcium hydroxyapatite, 15 cases of silicone oil and 6 cases of fat. The ultrasonic manifestation of hyaluronic acid was anechoic area, which could be divided into six types according to the distribution characteristics. The ultrasonography of polyacrylamide hydrogel showed fine punctate echo, which could be divided into nine types. The ultrasonographic appearance of growth factor was similar to the echo of the surrounding tissue, and the boundary was not clear. Calcium hydroxyapatite was characterized by uneven hyperechoic area, which was spread in the tissue space, with unclear boundary with surrounding tissues. Sonographic patterns of silicone oil were hyperechoic and cloudy on high-frequency ultrasound. The deep tissue and periosteum layer were not clear. Transplanted fat showed isoechoic area or uneven low-echo area, with clear boundary and peripheral adipose tissue acoustic enhancement., Conclusions: High-frequency ultrasound is safe and reliable for identification and typing of chin filling injection materials, which can be applied in clinical practice., Level of Evidence Iv: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 ., (© 2022. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.)