Search

Following a 2-week placebo lead-in, schizophrenic patients were randomly assigned to fluoxetine 20 mg/day or placebo added to depot neuroleptic for a 6-week, double blind trial. All patients had received a stable dose of depot neuroleptic for at least 6 months and did not meet criteria for depression. Serum samples were obtained at baseline and at weeks 4 and 6. Scores on the negative symptom subscale of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) were significantly lower at week 6, controlling for baseline scores, in patients receiving fluoxetine (n = 20) compared to patients receiving placebo (n = 21). Measures of psychosis, depression, global functioning and extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) did not differ between groups at week 6. Fluoxetine administration was associated with a mean 65% increase in serum fluphenazine concentrations in 15 patients and a mean 20% increase in serum haloperidol concentrations in three patients. The change in negative symptoms at week 6 did not correlate with serum concentrations of fluoxetine or norfluoxetine, but did inversely correlate with S-norfluoxetine, an active stereoisomer of fluoxetine. For these chronically ill patients, fluoxetine significantly improved negative symptoms and did not worsen EPS, despite causing substantial elevation in serum concentrations of neuroleptics.

Plasma fluphenazine concentrations (FLU) were measured in 45 patients with schizophrenic disorders who participated in a double-blind comparison of 5 and 25 mg fluphenazine decanoate (FD). The rise in plasma level of FLU 24 h after a "test dose" was significantly correlated with steady state FLU concentration at 12 weeks (for 5 mg patients, r = 0.45, P = 0.04; for 25 mg, r = 0.78, P = 0.005). Patients who had low FLU at baseline required nearly 6 months to reach a steady state when they received 25 mg. Patients who received 5 mg and had low FLU at baseline continued to demonstrate relatively low plasma levels for the entire 1st year. Although the mean FLU at 6 months was lower for patients who relapsed during the subsequent 18 months (0.57 ng/ml for relapsers vs 1.01 ng/ml for nonrelapsers), this difference was not statistically significant. When plasma levels from both dosage groups were combined, FLU at 12 weeks correlated significantly with factor scores for akinesia (r = 0.52, P = 0.002) and BPRS cluster scores for retardation (r = 0.52, P = 0.002). These results indicate that the measurement of fluphenazine plasma levels may be useful in determining when patients treated with FD are receiving drug doses which are likely to cause discomforting side effects.

Highly sensitive radioimmunoassays were applied to study the sulfoxidation of fluphenazine in 30 schizophrenic patients maintained on either 5 mg or 25 mg fluphenazine decanoate by intramuscular injection every 14 days over a period of 6 months. The presence of the sulfoxide metabolite was detected in all but one of the patients, such that 97% of the 340 plasma samples analysed contained the metabolite. Interpatient variations in plasma levels of fluphenazine, fluphenazine sulfoxide, and in drug to metabolite plasma level ratios were several fold higher than the corresponding intrapatient variations at both dosages. There were statistically significant tendencies for mean plasma fluphenazine levels to rise and mean plasma sulfoxide levels to fall over the 6-month period of study among patients on the high dose, consistent with our previously reported observation that it takes 3-6 months to establish a steady state of fluphenazine with this dosage regimen. By contrast, there were no statistically significant changes in mean plasma levels of either fluphenazine or its sulfoxide in patients on the low dose. Nevertheless, there was a significant rise in fluphenazine to fluphenazine sulfoxide mean plasma level ratios in both dosage groups. It is difficult to assess the significance of the changes in the drug to metabolite ratios with time, since there are no kinetic data on the phase II metabolism (conjugation) of fluphenazine or fluphenazine sulfoxide. This study shows that sulfoxidation is an important major pathway in the metabolism of intramuscularly-administered fluphenazine, and implies that metabolic sites other than gut wall are also involved in the process.

The single dose pharmacokinetics of trifluoperazine (5 mg, Stelazine) were investigated in black (n = 25) and white (n = 32) healthy male subjects. Plasma samples were harvested over 24 h and analysed by a GLC-MS method. There were wide intersubject variations in all pharmacokinetic parameters examined, including Cmax, AUC, apparent oral volume of distribution at steady state, and elimination half-life. For each of these parameters the distribution was positively skewed in both blacks and whites and the geometric mean gave a better estimate of central tendency than the corresponding arithmetic mean. In all pharmacokinetic parameters examined there was no significant difference detected between black and white subjects or between smokers and non-smokers.

The authors review the literature regarding the pharmacokinetics of long-acting injectable neuroleptic drugs (LINS). There are important differences between LINS and oral neuroleptics that affect their pharmacokinetics. By avoiding first pass metabolism in gut and liver, LINS result in lower circulating concentrations of metabolites than are found after oral administration. In addition, LINS take more time to reach a stable steady state than their oral counterparts. The clinical significance of these pharmacokinetic properties is discussed. The authors recommend that when patients are being changed from oral neuroleptics to LINS, that this conversion be done gradually over several months.

The single dose pharmacokinetics of fluphenazine (2 x 5 mg tablets, Prolixin) were studied in 21 drug free male psychiatric patients (12 black, 9 white). Plasma samples were harvested over a period of 48 h while the patients were on a strictly controlled diet. The results showed wide interpatient variations in all pharmacokinetic parameters including Cmax, AUC, apparent oral clearance, and elimination half-life. It was determined for each of these parameters that the geometric mean gave a better estimate of central tendency than the corresponding arithmetic mean and the distribution was skewed and leptokurtotic. There was no significant difference between blacks and whites in any pharmacokinetic parameter examined. Considerable variations and marked undulations in the elimination portion of the plasma concentration versus time profiles were evident, possibly indicating biliary recycling of the drug. These undulations made it difficult to determine elimination rate constants for several of the patients. Hydrolysis or plasma samples from one patient demonstrated that the conjugate(s) of fluphenazine was present in three to four times the concentration of the unchanged drug.