Search

Purpose: Sarcomas are a heterogeneous group of malignant neoplasms with a wide range of histological types and occur in almost any anatomic site and side. This study evaluated the prognostic factors in sarcoma patients based on German clinical cancer registry data., Methods: The German clinical cancer register of Saxony-Anhalt was used for all data analyses. Sarcoma cases of all clinical or pathological T-stages (T1a-T4c), all N-stages (N0-3) and M-stages (0-1b) corresponding to the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) stages I to IVB were considered. In our analyses, 787 cases diagnosed between 2005 and 2022 were included. Further, we assessed the association of cancer-related parameters with mortality and hazard ratios (HR) from the Cox proportional hazard models. We included sex, age at diagnosis, histological grade, T-, N- and M-stages, tumor size, tumor localization and tumor side as parameters in our regression models., Results: The majority of sarcoma patients were diagnosed with leiomyosarcoma (12%), liposarcoma (11%), angiosarcoma (5.3%) and myxofibrosarcoma (2.7%). In our univariate regression models, tumors localized in more than one location, head, face and neck region as well as the pelvis and lower extremity were associated with increased mortality risk (more than one location: HR 7.10, 95% CI 2.20-22.9; head, face and neck: HR 1.35, 95% CI 0.89-2.06; pelvis: HR 1.27, 95% CI 0.86-1.89; lower extremity: HR 1.44, 95% CI 1.05-1.96). Higher histological grades, UICC-grades and TNM-stages were related to a higher mortality risk. Differing histological subtypes had significant influence on overall survival and progression-free survival. Patients diagnosed with fibromyxoid sarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma and angiosarcoma were related to higher mortality risk compared to other histological subtypes (fibromyxoid sarcoma: HR 5.2, 95% CI 0.71-38.1; rhabdomyosarcoma: HR 2.93, 95% CI 1.44-6.00; angiosarcoma: HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.53-2.18)., Conclusions: Histological grade, tumor size, nodal and distant metastasis, tumor localization and histological subtype were determined as prognostic factors in terms of survival., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Purpose: Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, mostly due to delayed diagnosis. The objective of this study is to examine the treatment patterns and overall survival (OS) outcomes in a cohort of patients diagnosed with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) over a period of 12 years in Germany., Methods: This retrospective study is based on German cancer registry data and included 14,606 stage III NSCLC patients diagnosed during 2007-2018. Three time-periods were defined according to the availability of advanced diagnostic and treatment strategies (2007-2010 low availability era (LAE), 2011-2014 transition era (TE), 2015-2018 modern era (ME)). Patients were categorized according to the treatment they received during those eras. Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to investigate the association between being diagnosed during a certain era and survival. The hazard ratio (HR) estimates were reported along with the 95% confidence interval (CI)., Results: The median OS rose from 16 months in the LAE to 22 months in the ME. The HR for patients diagnosed and treated in the ME was estimated to be [0.78; 95% CI (0.74-0.83)] compared to those diagnosed and treated in LAE. The benefit was most evident for patients treated by radiotherapy and chemotherapy [HR 0.73 95% CI (0.66-0.82)]., Conclusion: This study highlights the importance of diagnostic and treatment advances in improving outcomes for lung cancer patients. Further studies are needed to assess progress in survival rates with current immunotherapy integration., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Purpose: Area-based socioeconomic deprivation has been established as an important indicator of health and a potential predictor of survival. In this study, we aimed to measure the effect of socioeconomic inequality on endometrial cancer survival., Methods: Population-based data on patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer between 2004 and 2014 were obtained from the German Centre for Cancer Registry Data. Socioeconomic inequality was defined by the German Index of Socioeconomic Deprivation. We investigated the association of deprivation and overall survival through Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional regression models., Results: A total of 21,602 women, with a mean age of 67.8 years, were included in our analysis. The observed 5-year overall survival time for endometrial cancer patients living in the most affluent districts (first quintile) was 78.6%. The overall survival rate decreased as the level of deprivation increased (77.2%, 73.9%, 76.1%, 74.7%, for patients in the second, third, fourth, and fifth quintile (most deprived patients), respectively). Cox regression models showed stage I patients living in the most deprived districts to have a higher hazard of overall mortality when compared to the cases living in the most affluent districts [Hazard ratio: 1.20; 95% Confidence interval (0.99-1.47)] after adjusting for age, tumor characteristics, and treatment., Conclusion: Our results indicate differences in endometrial cancer survival according to socioeconomic deprivation among stage I patients. Considering data limitations, future studies with access to individual-level patient information should be conducted to examine the underlying causes for the observed disparity in cancer survival., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a primary malignant brain tumour characterized by a very low long-term survival. The aim of this study was to analyse the distribution of treatment modalities and their effect on survival for GBM cases diagnosed in Germany between 1999 and 2014., Methods: Cases were pooled from the German Cancer Registries with International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, third edition (ICD-O-3) codes for GBM or giant-cell GBM. Three periods, first (January 1999-December 2005), second (January 2006-December 2010) and a third period (January 2011-December 2014) were defined. Kaplan-Meier plots with long-rank test compared median overall survival (OS) between groups. Survival differences were assessed with Cox proportional-hazards models adjusted for available confounders., Results: In total, 40,138 adult GBM cases were analysed, with a mean age at diagnosis 64.0 ± 12.4 years. GBM was more common in men (57.3%). The median OS was 10.0 (95% CI 9.0-10.0) months. There was an increase in 2-year survival, from 16.6% in the first to 19.3% in the third period. When stratified by age group, period and treatment modalities, there was an improved median OS after 2005 due to treatment advancements. Younger age, female sex, surgical resection, use of radiotherapy and chemotherapy, were independent factors associated with better survival., Conclusion: The inclusion of temozolomide chemotherapy has considerably improved median OS in the older age groups but had a lesser effect in the younger age group of cases. The analysis showed survival improvements for each treatment option over time., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Purpose: Despite recent improvements in cancer treatment in Germany, a marked difference in cancer survival based on socioeconomic factors persists. We aim to quantify the effect of socioeconomic inequality on head and neck cancer (HNC) survival., Methods: Information on 20,821 HNC patients diagnosed in 2009-2013 was routinely collected by German population-based cancer registries. Socioeconomic inequality was defined by the German Index of Socioeconomic Deprivation. The Cox proportional regression and relative survival analysis measured the survival disparity according to level of socioeconomic deprivation with respective confidence intervals (CI). A causal mediation analysis was conducted to quantify the effect of socioeconomic deprivation mediated through medical care, stage at diagnosis, and treatment on HNC survival., Results: The most socioeconomically deprived patients were found to have the highest hazard of dying when compared to the most affluent (Hazard Ratio: 1.25, 95% CI 1.17-1.34). The most deprived patients also had the worst 5-year age-adjusted relative survival (50.8%, 95% CI 48.5-53.0). Our mediation analysis showed that most of the effect of deprivation on survival was mediated through differential stage at diagnosis during the first 6 months after HNC diagnosis. As follow-up time increased, medical care, stage at diagnosis, and treatment played no role in mediating the effect of deprivation on survival., Conclusion: This study confirms the survival disparity between affluent and deprived HNC patients in Germany. Considering data limitations, our results suggest that, within six months after HNC diagnosis, the elimination of differences in stage at diagnosis could reduce survival inequalities.

Objective: To assess the association of public health parameters with the regional variation in the initial treatment for prostate cancer., Methods: We used data from German epidemiologic cancer registries for the years 2009-2013. Presence of a certified cancer center, a radiotherapy and/or urology institution, the district-specific GDP, and population density were used as predictors. Patients with indication for adjuvant treatment were excluded (T3b). Only districts with defined quality criteria were eligible. We used general linear mixed models (equivalent to logistic regression) with a covariance matrix weighted by the Euclidean distances between districts. Models were adjusted for age, grading, and TNM stage. We performed sensitivity analyses by imputing missing data with multiple imputation and considering extreme case scenarios. We applied inverse probability weighting to account for missing values., Results: When radiotherapy/surgery is compared to neither treatment, the probability for the latter was higher in East than in West Germany (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.43-2.02). The same was true for districts with both, a radiotherapy and urologic treatment facility (OR 1.43, 1.19-1.72). Analyzing radiotherapy vs. surgery, the probability for prostatectomy was inversely associated with the presence of a radiotherapy unit when compared to districts with neither treatment facility (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.38-0.73). Patients treated in East Germany were more likely to receive a surgical treatment (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.08-1.66). Sensitivity analyses revealed no relevant change of effect estimates., Conclusion: Treatment differs between East and West Germany and is associated with the presence of a radiotherapy or urology clinic.

Background: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) can achieve high tumour control with limited toxicity for inoperable early stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients., Patients and Methods: The German Epidemiologic Cancer Registries from the Robert-Koch Institute were assessed. Periods according to the availability of SBRT were: (1) 2000-2003 (pre-SBRT); (2) 2004-2007 (interim); and (3) 2007-2014 (broad availability of SBRT). To assess the association of cancer-related parameters with mortality, hazard ratios (HR) from Cox proportional hazards models were computed. To evaluate the change of treatment-related mortality, we performed interaction analyses and the relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI, additive scale) was computed., Results: A total of 16,292 patients with UICC stage I NSCLC diagnosed between 2000 and 2014 were analysed. Radiotherapy utilization increased from 5% in pre-SBRT era to 8.8% after 2007. In univariate analyses, survival in the whole cohort improved only marginally when 2000-2003 is compared to 2004-2007 (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.85-1.01) or 2008-2014 (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.86-1.01). Comparing surgery/radiotherapy, mortality in the radiotherapy group started from a 3.5-fold risk in 2000-2003 to 2.6 after 2007. The interaction analysis revealed a stronger improvement for radiotherapy (multiplicative scale for 2000-2003 vs. > 2007: 0.74, 95% CI 0.58-0.94). On an additive scale, treatment × period interaction revealed an RERI for 2000-2003 vs. > 2007 of - 1.18 (95% CI - 1.8, - 0.55)., Conclusions: Using population-based data, we observed a survival improvement in stage I lung cancer over time. With an increasing utilization of radiotherapy, a stronger improvement occurred in patients treated with radiotherapy when compared to surgery.