Search

Background and Objectives: Trauma patients often suffer from persisting pain even years after injury, and data on long-term pain management is lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency of persisting pain and health-related quality of life (HrQoL) among trauma victims 2 years after injury. Furthermore, the frequency of pain specialist consultation and the quality of outpatient pain management, including phamacological management, was assessed., Materials and Methods: We analyzed prospectively collected data on severely injured adult patients treated between 2008-2011 at the Cologne Merheim Medical Center (CMMC)/Germany.  Data included the 'Polytrauma Outcome Profile' and a standardized questionnaire on outpatient pain management. Exclusion criteria were death, inability to answer the questionnaire due to cognitive disabilities and lack of language knowledge., Results and Conclusions: 207/391 (53 %) data sets were available for analysis, presenting a typical trauma collective with injury severity of ISS 19, predominantly male and a mean age of 44 years. 2 years after trauma 59 % still reported that they suffered from severe persisting pain; 53 % of these patients were under pharmacological pain medication. Only 1/5 of the patients with severe persisting pain was treated by a pain specialist. Successful treatment options do exist; improvement of treatment is required.

Background and Aims: Prehospital triage is aimed at getting the right patient to the right hospital. Evaluations on the performance of prehospital triage tools are scarce. This study examines the ability of the American College of Surgeons' Committee on Trauma (ACSCOT) triage guidelines to identify major trauma patients in a European trauma system. Furthermore, this study evaluates the predictive power of other prehospital measurements., Materials and Methods: Prehospital data of 151 minor (Injury Severity Score (ISS) 1-15) and 151 major trauma patients, (ISS > 15) treated at a Dutch trauma center, were collected. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors of major trauma patients., Results: The major trauma patients particularly incurred severe head injuries (45.7%) and severe thorax injuries (21.9%). The ACSCOT guidelines had a sensitivity of 84.1% and a specificity of 77.5%. A new prehospital trauma triage model was constructed including nine predictors of major trauma. This model identified more major trauma patients than the ACSCOT (sensitivity 92.1%, p = 0.023) and resulted in a comparable specificity (79.5%; p = 0.711)., Conclusion: The new triage model outperforms the ACSCOT triage guidelines in identifying major trauma patients in the prehospital setting. The new triage guidelines may improve patient outcomes but needs to be validated in a prospective study.

Background and Aims: Since 1999, the Dutch trauma care has been regionalized into ten trauma systems. This study is the first to review such a trauma system. The aim was to examine the sensitivity of prehospital triage criteria [triage revised trauma score (T-RTS)] in identifying major trauma patients and to evaluate the current level of trauma care of a regionalized Dutch trauma system for major trauma patients., Patients and Methods: Major trauma patients (n=511) (June 2001-December 2003) were selected from a regional trauma registry database. The prehospital T-RTS was computed and standardized W scores (Ws) were generated to compare observed vs expected survival based on contemporary US- and UK-norm databases., Results: The T-RTS showed low sensitivity for the prehospital identification of major trauma patients [34.1% (T-RTS< or =10)]. Nevertheless, 78.0% of all major trauma patients were directly managed by the trauma center. These patients were more severely injured than their counterparts at non-trauma-center hospitals (p<0.001). No significant difference emerged between the mortality rates of both groups. The Ws {-0.46 calculated on the US model [95% confidence interval (CI) ranging from -1.99 to 1.07]} [0.60 calculated on the UK model (95% CI ranging from -1.25 to 2.44)] did not differ significantly from zero., Conclusion: The trauma center managed most of the major trauma patients in the trauma system but the triage criteria need to be reconsidered. The level of care of the regional trauma system was shown to measure up to US and UK benchmarks.

220 of 268 polytraumatized patients (82.1%) presented an additional head injury, which increased the mortality significantly. By the Hannover Polytrauma Score we could demonstrate that the severity of the polytrauma and the prognosis depended on the extent of the brain injury. Important risk factors were skull fractures and shock on arrival. 66.7% of the patients with a severe brain trauma and a skull fracture died; without this fracture, only 36.8% died. 76.1% of the children with a systolic blood pressure (SBP) > 80 mm Hg survived, but only 31.2% with a SBF < or = 80 mm Hg did not die. For all polytraumatized children we recommend a computer tomography of the head. In spite of a negative initial CT a follow up CCT should be performed.

To improve patient's outcome of seriously injured occupants after vehicle accident rescue should be performed as soon as possible. While the rescue-time-period after EMS alarming is well-defined the rescue-time-period before EMS-alarm is very variable from minutes to several hours. To reduce the rescue-time-period between accident occurrence and EMS-alarm the Automatic Collision Notification (ACN) was developed. The ACN is a new invehicle-equipment which detects a severe vehicle crash and alarms via cellular phone the EMS automatically. Simultaneously the exact accident location is transmitted (GPS). Official data of the European Community predict a 15% reduction of road traffic fatalities with ACN. Thereby the economical benefit of about 561 million [symbol: see text] could be calculated for Germany 2000.

Background: The answer to the question "Scores in polytrauma - do they help ?" is discussed., Discussion: One of the two sections deals with the role of scores used for clinical decision making in individual patients and, in the other, the significance of scores in improving patient care is analyzed., Results: It is shown that scores may be helpful in both regards. However, certain methodological limitations of scores have to be considered.

3 different types of complex spinal trauma are defined: Type I means a multilevel contiguous or non contiguous unstable injury, type II is described as a spinal injury with concomitant thoracic or abdominal lesion, type III stands for the coincidence of spinal injury and polytrauma. Overlapping of different types occurs. Type I: The incidence amounts according a german multicenter study to about 2.5%. Multilevel injuries need to be stabilized for a long distance from posterior. With a thorough analysis the segments to be fused are determined. Type II: The leading thoracic injury is a lung contusion which occurs in up to 50% of the cases. A CT scan of the thorax during the first diagnostic screening is recommended. Early reduction and stabilization from posterior should be aimed at. During the first two weeks anterior procedures are contraindicated. Abdominal injuries are to be found in 3-4% of all spinal injuries. All organs could be affected. A typical constallation is the "seat-belt syndrome" with lesions of the upper abdominal organs and a flexiondistraction injury of the upper lumbar spine. The main problem is to make the diagnosis of both components initially. Most of the patients may be treated in one operation by first taking care of the abdominal injury and than stabilizing the spine. The prognosis of this combination is favorable. Type III: In 17-18% of all polytraumatized patients lesions of the spine are to be diagnosed. From these only one third need surgical care. From 680 patients with operatively treated fractures of the thoracolumbar junction 6.2% were polytraumatized according to the multicenter study mentioned above. The risk of missing a spinal injury in polytrauma totals approximately 20%. Surgical stabilization should be performed in the primary phase (day-1-surgery). Additional injuries, potentially time consuming operations with a high blood loss sometimes necessitate a different approach. Non stabilized spinal injuries apparently do not have the same negative effect on the whole organism as long bone fractures. In the early phase of treatment on the C-spine only anterior procedures and on the thoracolumbar spine only posterior techniques should be applied.

The treatment of injuries in elderly patients requires thorough planning. Preexisting diseases and the current status determine the priorities and methods of treatment. The advantages of extensive preoperative assessment must be judged against the risks of a delay in undertaking operative measures. Fracture treatment aims at fast, careful and simple fixation, which is nevertheless stable and sufficient. Modern methods and implants allow acceptable results to be achieved, even under the limitations of modern health care systems.

Hospital standards for the care of multiple traumatized patients include certain clinical capabilities, special logistics (appraisal of structure), and--even more important--algorithms for simultaneous activities in diagnosis and therapy (assessment of process). The main goal in the trauma system should be definitive, specialized care for the injured in the shortest possible time. Economically there is no way of creating a tight network of highly developed trauma centers close to every patient. Also primary air-transport by helicopters over some distances in every case is not realistic (darkness, weather conditions). Therefore, an algorithm that is dependent on regional conditions is needed for primary care and stabilization of multiple trauma patients in smaller hospitals followed by early transfer to trauma centers. The effectivity of this stepwise approach must be compared with primary care in a trauma center. Trauma registers are necessary to plan for the future. Quality improvement programs (education, system evaluation) should be installed, especially for smaller hospitals bound into the trauma system. Financial support is essential for hospitals designated for care of multiple traumatized patients in rural areas.

Score systems in trauma try to aggregate the severity of injury in a single number of formula. They give a common basis to standardize logistics and outcome in trauma management. This holds true only if the score is valid, reliable, and based on a meticulous documentation of data. As errors cannot be excluded, individual decisions in trauma management can never rely on scores alone.

Guidelines for the treatment of fractures in children include social and therapeutic parameters, such as adequate hospitalization for children, a definitive therapy with a low degree of invasiveness, and a high degree of freedom of mobility. The selection of a method is linked to the patient's requests. Minimally invasive techniques should be applied in preference. Therapeutic strategies should be compared not only with regard to results, but also with regard to effectivity and efficiency. There are no strict guidelines in therapeutic procedures whatsoever.

Prostanoids are inflammatory mediators which originate from endothelial cells following local tissue damage. That is why plasma levels of prostanoids are possible markers of inflammatory response and severity of trauma. We were able to demonstrate that the systemic release of prostanoids does not depend on the score values (ISS, PTS) but rather on different trauma patterns (chest trauma, head injury). Influencing vascular permeability and resistance elevated plasma levels of prostanoids may explain the impairment of pulmonary function in traumatized patients. It seems to be useful to re-evaluate the scoring systems with respect to chest trauma and head injury.

The incidence of thromboembolic complications in patients with multiple injuries was reviewed as well with respect to our own prospective investigation (141 patients with a mean injury severity score of 37 points). The rate of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in severely injured patients is reported to vary from 20 to 90% if invasive diagnostic procedures are used, whereas the rate of clinically relevant manifestations of DVT seems to be much lower. Although 96% of the patient population in our study were thought to be at high risk of having DVT (applying generally accepted risk factors), only 1.4% of the subjects actually developed clinically relevant DVT. The analysis of several parameters of the coagulation and fibrinolytic systems (platelet count, prothrombin time, partial thromboplastin time, antithrombin III, prothrombin, plasminogen, tissue-plasminogen-activator and its inhibitor) showed simultaneous activation of both systems in these severely injured patients. Thus, increased coagulation seems to be counteracted by increased fibrinolysis. In addition, fluid resuscitation with crystalloid and colloid infusions in the prehospital period (1970 ml and 573 ml, respectively) can be viewed as early prophylaxis of thromboembolic complications. Thus, the low DVT rate in a high-risk patient group with multiple injuries might be at least partially explained.

A total of 1566 patients with fractures of the pelvis were treated at the Department of Traumatology at the Hannover Medical School between 1972 and 1990. Of these, 1350 patients had fractures of the pelvic ring, 216 isolated acetabulum fractures, and 398 combinations of pelvic ring fractures and acetabular involvement. Of these patients, 718 were admitted with severe polytrauma. For 1254 patients complete files were available for clinical and radiological evaluation of fracture distribution, classification (Tile and anatomical location) and concomitant injuries. A significant increase in the severity of trauma, the severity of the pelvic fractures and the rate of internal stabilization, especially of the posterior pelvic ring, was observed during the observation period. The overall mortality after pelvic fracture was 18.1%. This mortality was correlated to the Hannover Polytrauma Score (PTS) and the associated extrapelvic blunt trauma. Internal fixation of pelvic fractures was performed in 195 patients. Our experience led to standardized procedures for the different fracture locations. In fractures type Tile B, an anterior procedure led in all cases to anatomic or near anatomic healing. In unstable pelvic ring fractures (Tile C), external fixation led to a significantly higher rate of posterior dislocations (over 1 cm) than did internal fixation. In these situations a combined posterior and anterior internal fixation procedure improved the result compared to posterior internal stabilizations alone. As a result, internal stabilization using a standardized technique for every fracture location is recommended for all unstable pelvic ring fractures.

On the occasion of the 1990 Conference of the German Society for Accident Surgery (DGU) in Berlin, a working group "Pelvis" of the DGU and the AO International was established on the initiative of H. Tscherne. It is the objective of this working group to formulate guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pelvic girdle fractures, within the framework of a prospective multicentre study based on comparable results. In the annual report for 1991, a total of 460 pelvic fractures were documented. Classification shows that 9.5% belong to group A, 46.3% to group B, and 44.2% to group C. One hundred and eighty-two patients (39.6%) had an isolated pelvic injury, while 278 (60.4%) sustained multiple injuries. The average polytrauma score for all 460 subjects was 23.2 points. The surgical management was shown to depend on the severity of the fracture.

Sacral fractures are rare injuries that are often neglected because of the general severity of the patient's injuries. They are typical injuries in patients with polytraumata. A "hidden" injury, they are often diagnosed late or are even missed. In a well-documented consecutive series of 1,350 patients with pelvic fractures treated in the trauma department of the Hannover Medical School between 1972 and 1991, a total of 377 sacrum fractures were evaluated in a retrospective study. The cause of the accident, mechanism of injury, concomitant injuries, diagnostic procedures, classification of the pelvic injury (TILE), as well as the classification of the sacrum injury (DENIS), treatment and outcome were analyzed in all cases. Observed complications with special attention to injuries to the lumbosacral plexus were correlated with the classification of the sacrum and pelvis, as well as with a detailed analysis of the fracture pattern and fracture characteristics. In 89.4% at least one additional body region was injured in these patients. PTS (Hannover Polytrauma Score) groups III and IV included 42.5% of the patients. With an improved diagnostic protocol (radiological a.p. views, oblique views and CT scan), the observed rate of sacrum fractures was 33%. Neurological deficits occurred in 15.1% of the patients. In contrast to the literature, the rate of neurological deficits was related more to the degree of pelvic instability (TILE) than to the specific fracture pattern in the sacrum. In stable injuries (TILE A) neurological deficits were only seen in exceptions. In type B injuries the maximum rate was 10%, whereas in unstable fractures (TILE C) the rate of neurological deficits was 32.6% in transalar fractures (DENIS zone I), 42.9% in transforaminal fractures (DENIS zone II), and 63.6% in central fracture types (DENIS zone III). Additional risk indicators for neurological impairment are avulsion fractures of the sacrum, comminuted and bilateral fracture lines. The fracture classification should thus be modified. Our own experience with operative therapy for sacral fractures (open revision of the sacral plexus together with internal stabilization of the fracture) is still limited, but based on the experience presented, further development of the treatment protocol for sacrum fractures should be considered.

Isolated or combined soft tissue defects of the lower leg are still a challenge as regard diagnostic and differential treatment. We distinguish acute and chronic isolated or combined soft tissue defect. Acute trauma within a multiple injury pattern is a special form of the acute soft tissue defect. For diagnostic purposes we use a preoperative and intraoperative standardized diagnostic programme. A new classification oriented towards the therapeutic procedure is presented, as is therapy algorithm which has been created.