Search

Your search keyword '"Reuter J"' showing total 20 results
Start Over Author "Reuter J" Publisher springer-verlag
20 results on '"Reuter J"'

6. Supersymmetry parameter analysis: SPA convention and project

Author

Aguilar-Saavedra, J. A., Ali, A., Allanach, B. C., Arnowitt, R., Baer, H. A., Bagger, J. A., Balazs, C., Barger, V., Barnett, M., Bartl, A., Battaglia, M., Bechtle, P., Bélanger, G., Belyaev, A., Berger, E. L., Blair, G., Boos, E., Carena, M., Choi, S. Y., Deppisch, F., Roeck, A. De, Desch, K., Diaz, M. A., Djouadi, A., Dutta, B., Dutta, S., Eberl, H., Ellis, J., Erler, J., Fraas, H., Freitas, A., Fritzsche, T., Godbole, R. M., Gounaris, G. J., Guasch, J., Gunion, J., Haba, N., Haber, H. E., Hagiwara, K., Han, L., Han, T., He, H.-J., Heinemeyer, S., Hesselbach, S., Hidaka, K., Hinchliffe, I., Hirsch, M., Hohenwarter-Sodek, K., Hollik, W., Hou, W. S., Hurth, T., Jack, I., Jiang, Y., Jones, D. R. T., Kalinowski, J., Kamon, T., Kane, G., Kang, S. K., Kernreiter, T., Kilian, W., Kim, C. S., King, S. F., Kittel, O., Klasen, M., Kneur, J.-L., Kovarik, K., Krämer, M., Kraml, S., Lafaye, R., Langacker, P., Logan, H. E., Ma, W.-G., Majerotto, W., Martyn, H.-U., Matchev, K., Miller, D. J., Mondragon, M., Moortgat-Pick, G., Moretti, S., Mori, T., Moultaka, G., Muanza, S., Mühlleitner, M. M., Mukhopadhyaya, B., Nauenberg, U., Nojiri, M. M., Nomura, D., Nowak, H., Okada, N., Olive, K. A., Öller, W., Peskin, M., Plehn, T., Polesello, G., Porod, W., Quevedo, F., Rainwater, D., Reuter, J., Richardson, P., Rolbiecki, K., Roy, P., Rückl, R., Rzehak, H., Schleper, P., Siyeon, K., Skands, P., Slavich, P., Stöckinger, D., Sphicas, P., Spira, M., Tait, T., Tovey, D. R., Valle, J. W. F., Wagner, C. E. M., Weber, Ch, Weiglein, G., Wienemann, P., Xing, Z.-Z., Yamada, Y., Yang, J. M., Zerwas, D., Zerwas, P. M., Zhang, R.-Y., Zhang, X., and Zhu, S.-H.

Published
2006
Full Text
View/download PDF

15. Apparate

Author

Coffin, C. C., Baker, Hersteller C., Volkmann, W., Löber, H., Yee, J. Y., and Reuter, J.

Published
1933
Full Text
View/download PDF

17. Supersymmetry parameter analysis: SPA convention and project

Author

MCTP, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA, Department of Modern Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China, William I. Fine Theoretical Physics Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA, Laboratoire de Physique des Particules, Annecy-le-Vieux, France, Laboratoire de Physique Subatomique et de Cosmologie, Universit?? Grenoble I, Grenoble, France, Department of Physics, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan, IPPP, University of Durham, Durham, UK, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA, PH Department, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, Department of Physics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA, Institut f??r Hochenergiephysik, ??sterreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Wien, Austria, Institut f??r Experimentalphysik, Universit??t Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany, Max-Planck-Institut f??r Physik, M??nchen, Germany, Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK, Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, Hamburg, Germany, Institute of Theoretical Physics, Warsaw University, Warsaw, Poland, Laboratoire de Physique Theorique, Annecy-le-Vieux, France, Physikalisches Institut, Universit??t Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA, LPTA, Universit?? Montpellier II, CNRS-IN2P3, Montpellier, France, High Energy Physics Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL, USA, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK, Harish-Chandra Research Institute, Allahabad, India, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA, IPN Universit?? Lyon, IN2P3-CNRS, Lyon, France, Theory Division, KEK, Tsukuba, Japan, Center for High Energy Physics and Institute of Modern Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China, Santa Cruz Institute for Particle Physics, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, USA, Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, IL, USA, Departamento de Fisica and CFTP, Instituto Superior Tecnico, Lisbon, Portugal, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK, Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, Zeuthen, Germany, Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, Paul Scherrer Institut, Villigen, Switzerland, Institut f??r Theoretische Physik, Universit??t Z??rich, Z??rich, Switzerland, LAL, Universit?? de Paris-Sud, IN2P3-CNRS, Orsay, France, Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Stanford, CA, USA; University of Delhi, Delhi, India, Institut f??r Theoretische Physik und Astrophysik, Universit??t W??rzburg, W??rzburg, Germany, Instituto de F??sica, UNAM, M??xico, Mexico, School of Physics, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea, Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Stanford, CA, USA; PH Department, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai, India, Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA, Instituto de F??sica Corpuscular, CSIC, Val??ncia, Spain, Department of Physics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA, Department of Theoretical Physics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece, Centre for High Energy Physics, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India, Institut f??r Theoretische Physik, RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany, Facultat de F??sica, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, Department of Physics, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea, Physikalisches Institut der Universit??t Bonn, Bonn, Germany, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA, Department of Physics, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea, Department of Physics, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada, Institut f??r Theoretische Physik, Universit??t Wien, Wien, Austria, Institut f??r Theoretische Physik, Universit??t Z??rich, Z??rich, Switzerland; Instituto de F??sica Corpuscular, CSIC, Val??ncia, Spain, Department of Physics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, Surrey, UK, Department of Physics, Chonbuk National University, Chonju, Korea, Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics, MSU, Moscow, Russia, Institute of Theoretical Physics, University of Tokushima, Tokushima, Japan, Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, Hamburg, Germany; I. Physikalisches Institut der RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany, High Energy Physics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden, ICEPP, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan, YITP, Kyoto Universty, Kyoto, Japan, ITP, School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing, China, Department of Physics, University of California, Davis, CA, USA, Department of Physics, Tokyo Gakugei University, Tokyo, Japan, DAMTP, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK, Physics Department, Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile, Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Stanford, CA, USA, INFN, Sezione di Pavia, Pavia, Italy, High Energy Physics Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL, USA; Enrico Fermi Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA, Ann Arbor, Allanach, B. C., King, S. F., Blair, G. A., Kraml, S., Kim, C. S., Bagger, J. A., Barnett, M., Ellis, J., Hou, Wei-Shu, Roy, P., Yamada, Y., Xing, Z. -Z., Hurth, T., Jiang, Y., Zerwas, P. M., Belyaev, A., Reuter, J., Langacker, Paul, Valle, J. W. F., M??hlleitner, M. M., Spira, M., Nojiri, M. M., Majerotto, W., Moortgat-Pick, G., Moretti, S., Hesselbach, S., He, H. -J., Haber, H. E., Hagiwara, K., Boos, E., Carena, M., Aguilar-Saavedra, J. A., Miller, D. J., Nowak, H., Nomura, D., Okada, N., Lafaye, R., Erler, J., Wienemann, P., Polesello, G., Jones, D. R. T., Fritzsche, T., Zerwas, D., B??langer, G., Bartl, A., Richardson, P., Rolbiecki, K., Schleper, P., Kilian, W., Rzehak, H., Kang, S. K., Yang, J. M., Bechtle, P., Freitas, A., Kane, Gordon L., Fraas, H., Kalinowski, J., Kamon, T., Jack, I., Eberl, H., Dutta, B., Dutta, S., Barger, V., Wagner, C. E. M., Ma, W. -G., Rainwater, D., Berger, E. L., Desch, K., Gounaris, G. J., Godbole, R. M., Guasch, J., Olive, K. A., Kittel, O., Klasen, M., Kr??mer, M., Logan, H. E., Zhang, R. -Y., Skands, P., Weiglein, G., Slavich, P., Zhang, X., Deppisch, F., Ali, Aejaz., Choi, S. Y., Han, T., Haba, N., Roeck, Albert De, Matchev, Konstantin T., Han, L., Heinemeyer, S., Martyn, H. -U., Moultaka, G., Mondragon, M., Sphicas, P., Mori, T., Mukhopadhyaya, B., Muanza, S., St??ckinger, D., Nauenberg, U., Tait, T., Tovey, D. R., Siyeon, K., Hidaka, K., Gunion, J., R??ckl, R., Weber, Ch., Hirsch, M., Hinchliffe, I., Djouadi, A., Peskin, M., Plehn, T., Arnowitt, R., Diaz, M. A., Baer, H. A., Porod, W., Balazs, C., Quevedo, F., Hohenwarter-Sodek, K., Kernreiter, T., Zhu, S. -H., Battaglia, Marco, ??ller, W., Hollik, W., Kovarik, K., Kneur, J. -L., MCTP, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA, Department of Modern Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China, William I. Fine Theoretical Physics Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA, Laboratoire de Physique des Particules, Annecy-le-Vieux, France, Laboratoire de Physique Subatomique et de Cosmologie, Universit?? Grenoble I, Grenoble, France, Department of Physics, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan, IPPP, University of Durham, Durham, UK, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA, PH Department, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, Department of Physics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA, Institut f??r Hochenergiephysik, ??sterreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Wien, Austria, Institut f??r Experimentalphysik, Universit??t Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany, Max-Planck-Institut f??r Physik, M??nchen, Germany, Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK, Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, Hamburg, Germany, Institute of Theoretical Physics, Warsaw University, Warsaw, Poland, Laboratoire de Physique Theorique, Annecy-le-Vieux, France, Physikalisches Institut, Universit??t Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA, LPTA, Universit?? Montpellier II, CNRS-IN2P3, Montpellier, France, High Energy Physics Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL, USA, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK, Harish-Chandra Research Institute, Allahabad, India, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA, IPN Universit?? Lyon, IN2P3-CNRS, Lyon, France, Theory Division, KEK, Tsukuba, Japan, Center for High Energy Physics and Institute of Modern Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China, Santa Cruz Institute for Particle Physics, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, USA, Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, IL, USA, Departamento de Fisica and CFTP, Instituto Superior Tecnico, Lisbon, Portugal, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK, Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, Zeuthen, Germany, Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, Paul Scherrer Institut, Villigen, Switzerland, Institut f??r Theoretische Physik, Universit??t Z??rich, Z??rich, Switzerland, LAL, Universit?? de Paris-Sud, IN2P3-CNRS, Orsay, France, Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Stanford, CA, USA; University of Delhi, Delhi, India, Institut f??r Theoretische Physik und Astrophysik, Universit??t W??rzburg, W??rzburg, Germany, Instituto de F??sica, UNAM, M??xico, Mexico, School of Physics, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea, Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Stanford, CA, USA; PH Department, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai, India, Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA, Instituto de F??sica Corpuscular, CSIC, Val??ncia, Spain, Department of Physics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA, Department of Theoretical Physics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece, Centre for High Energy Physics, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India, Institut f??r Theoretische Physik, RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany, Facultat de F??sica, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, Department of Physics, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea, Physikalisches Institut der Universit??t Bonn, Bonn, Germany, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA, Department of Physics, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea, Department of Physics, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada, Institut f??r Theoretische Physik, Universit??t Wien, Wien, Austria, Institut f??r Theoretische Physik, Universit??t Z??rich, Z??rich, Switzerland; Instituto de F??sica Corpuscular, CSIC, Val??ncia, Spain, Department of Physics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, Surrey, UK, Department of Physics, Chonbuk National University, Chonju, Korea, Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics, MSU, Moscow, Russia, Institute of Theoretical Physics, University of Tokushima, Tokushima, Japan, Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, Hamburg, Germany; I. Physikalisches Institut der RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany, High Energy Physics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden, ICEPP, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan, YITP, Kyoto Universty, Kyoto, Japan, ITP, School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing, China, Department of Physics, University of California, Davis, CA, USA, Department of Physics, Tokyo Gakugei University, Tokyo, Japan, DAMTP, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK, Physics Department, Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile, Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Stanford, CA, USA, INFN, Sezione di Pavia, Pavia, Italy, High Energy Physics Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL, USA; Enrico Fermi Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA, Ann Arbor, Allanach, B. C., King, S. F., Blair, G. A., Kraml, S., Kim, C. S., Bagger, J. A., Barnett, M., Ellis, J., Hou, Wei-Shu, Roy, P., Yamada, Y., Xing, Z. -Z., Hurth, T., Jiang, Y., Zerwas, P. M., Belyaev, A., Reuter, J., Langacker, Paul, Valle, J. W. F., M??hlleitner, M. M., Spira, M., Nojiri, M. M., Majerotto, W., Moortgat-Pick, G., Moretti, S., Hesselbach, S., He, H. -J., Haber, H. E., Hagiwara, K., Boos, E., Carena, M., Aguilar-Saavedra, J. A., Miller, D. J., Nowak, H., Nomura, D., Okada, N., Lafaye, R., Erler, J., Wienemann, P., Polesello, G., Jones, D. R. T., Fritzsche, T., Zerwas, D., B??langer, G., Bartl, A., Richardson, P., Rolbiecki, K., Schleper, P., Kilian, W., Rzehak, H., Kang, S. K., Yang, J. M., Bechtle, P., Freitas, A., Kane, Gordon L., Fraas, H., Kalinowski, J., Kamon, T., Jack, I., Eberl, H., Dutta, B., Dutta, S., Barger, V., Wagner, C. E. M., Ma, W. -G., Rainwater, D., Berger, E. L., Desch, K., Gounaris, G. J., Godbole, R. M., Guasch, J., Olive, K. A., Kittel, O., Klasen, M., Kr??mer, M., Logan, H. E., Zhang, R. -Y., Skands, P., Weiglein, G., Slavich, P., Zhang, X., Deppisch, F., Ali, Aejaz., Choi, S. Y., Han, T., Haba, N., Roeck, Albert De, Matchev, Konstantin T., Han, L., Heinemeyer, S., Martyn, H. -U., Moultaka, G., Mondragon, M., Sphicas, P., Mori, T., Mukhopadhyaya, B., Muanza, S., St??ckinger, D., Nauenberg, U., Tait, T., Tovey, D. R., Siyeon, K., Hidaka, K., Gunion, J., R??ckl, R., Weber, Ch., Hirsch, M., Hinchliffe, I., Djouadi, A., Peskin, M., Plehn, T., Arnowitt, R., Diaz, M. A., Baer, H. A., Porod, W., Balazs, C., Quevedo, F., Hohenwarter-Sodek, K., Kernreiter, T., Zhu, S. -H., Battaglia, Marco, ??ller, W., Hollik, W., Kovarik, K., and Kneur, J. -L.

Abstract

High-precision analyses of supersymmetry parameters aim at reconstructing the fundamental supersymmetric theory and its breaking mechanism. A well defined theoretical framework is needed when higher-order corrections are included. We propose such a scheme, Supersymmetry Parameter Analysis SPA, based on a consistent set of conventions and input parameters. A repository for computer programs is provided which connect parameters in different schemes and relate the Lagrangian parameters to physical observables at LHC and high energy e + e - linear collider experiments, i.e., masses, mixings, decay widths and production cross sections for supersymmetric particles. In addition, programs for calculating high-precision low energy observables, the density of cold dark matter (CDM) in the universe as well as the cross sections for CDM search experiments are included. The SPA scheme still requires extended efforts on both the theoretical and experimental side before data can be evaluated in the future at the level of the desired precision. We take here an initial step of testing the SPA scheme by applying the techniques involved to a specific supersymmetry reference point.

Published
2006

19. Simplified frontal EEG in adults under veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Author

Touchard C, Cartailler J, Vellieux G, de Montmollin E, Jaquet P, Wanono R, Reuter J, Para M, Bouadma L, Timsit JF, d'Ortho MP, Kubis N, Rouvel Tallec A, and Sonneville R

Abstract

Background: EEG-based prognostication studies in intensive care units often rely on a standard 21-electrode montage ( std EEG) requiring substantial human, technical, and financial resources. We here evaluate whether a simplified 4-frontal electrode montage ( 4-front EEG) can detect EEG patterns associated with poor outcomes in adult patients under veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO)., Methods: We conducted a reanalysis of EEG data from a prospective cohort on 118 adult patients under VA-ECMO, in whom EEG was performed on admission to intensive care. EEG patterns of interest included background rhythm, discontinuity, reactivity, and the Synek's score. They were all reassessed by an intensivist on a 4-front EEG montage, whose analysis was then compared to an expert's interpretation made on std EEG recordings. The main outcome measure was the degree of correlation between 4-front EEG and std EEG montages to identify EEG patterns of interest. The performance of the Synek scores calculated on 4-front EEG and std EEG montage to predict outcomes (i.e., 28-day mortality and 90-day Rankin score [Formula: see text]) was investigated in a secondary exploratory analysis., Results: The detection of EEG patterns using 4-front EEG was statistically similar to that of std EEG for background rhythm (Spearman rank test, ρ = 0.66, p < 0.001), discontinuity (Cohen's kappa, [Formula: see text] = 0.955), reactivity ([Formula: see text] = 0.739) and the Synek's score (ρ = 0.794, p < 0.001). Using the Synek classification, we found similar performances between 4-front EEG and std EEG montages in predicting 28-day mortality (AUC 4-front EEG 0.71, AUC std EEG 0.68) and for 90-day poor neurologic outcome (AUC 4-front EEG 0.71, AUC std EEG 0.66). An exploratory analysis confirmed that the Synek scores determined by 4 or 21 electrodes were independently associated with 28-day mortality and poor 90-day functional outcome., Conclusion: In adult patients under VA-ECMO, a simplified 4-frontal electrode EEG montage interpreted by an intensivist, detected common EEG patterns associated with poor outcomes, with a performance similar to that of a standard EEG montage interpreted by expert neurophysiologists. This simplified montage could be implemented as part of a multimodal evaluation for bedside prognostication.

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

20. Factors associated with major adverse kidney events in patients who underwent veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Author

Vinclair C, De Montmollin E, Sonneville R, Reuter J, Lebut J, Cally R, Mourvillier B, Neuville M, Ruckly S, Timsit JF, and Bouadma L

Abstract

Objective: To describe acute kidney injury (AKI) natural history and to identify predictors of major adverse kidney events (MAKE) within 1 year in patients supported by veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO)., Design: Retrospective observational study., Setting: Medical French intensive care unit between January 2014 and December 2016., Patients: Consecutive patients implanted with VA-ECMO ≥ 16 years, VA-ECMO for at least ≥ 48 h, and without end-stage chronic kidney disease (CKD)., Intervention: None., Measurements: Multivariate logistic regression of factors associated with MAKE at 1 year defined as one of the following criteria within day 360: death and receipt of renal replacement therapy (RRT) or persistent renal dysfunction, i.e., CKD ≥ stage 3 corresponding to an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≤ 60 ml/min/1.73 m 2 and MAKE at day 30 and day 90 defined as one of the following criteria within day 30 or day 90: death, receipt of renal replacement therapy and serum creatinine ≥ threefold increase., Main Results: 158 consecutive patients were included (male sex: 75.9%; median and interquartile range: age: 59 [47-66], Simplified Acute Physiology Score II: 55 [39-66], Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment Score: 9 [7-12], time on VA-ECMO: 7.5 [4-12] days). Among them 145 (91.8%) developed an AKI during the intensive care unit (ICU) stay and 85 (53.8%) needed renal replacement therapy (RRT). 59.9% (91/152), 60.5% (89/147) and 85.1% (120/141) evaluable patients had a MAKE-30, MAKE-90 and MAKE-360, respectively. Factors significantly associated with MAKE-360 were eGFR at baseline (odds ratio (OR) 0.98, confidence interval 95% (CI) [0.97;1.00], p 0.02), Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcome (KDIGO) stage at cannulation (p = 0.03), e.g., stage 3 vs. reference stage 0 OR 10.20 [1.77-58.87], and number of red blood cell (RBC) packs received while under ECMO (OR 1.14, CI 95% [1.01;1.28], p = 0.03). At 1 year among the 51 survivors, almost half of the alive patients (n = 20/51) had a decline of estimated glomerular filtration (eGFR) > 30% mL/min/1.73 m 2 . Their median eGFR decline was - 26.3% [- 46.6;- 10.7]., Conclusion: Patients undergoing VA-ECMO had a high risk of AKI during the ICU stay. Factors associated with MAKE 360 were mainly eGFR at baseline, KDIGO stage at cannulation and, number of RBC packs received while under ECMO. Among survivors at 1 year, almost half of the alive patients (n = 20/51) had a decline eGFR > 30%.

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results