Search

Introduction/Aims . Primary lateral sclerosis (PLS) is exceedingly rare and has been an enigmatic disease. Recent progress has drastically changed this perception, with early biomarkers being investigated and potential medications for PLS emerging at the preclinical stage. The aim of this paper is to describe a study of PLS natural history and discuss the limitations and proposed solutions to the study of a rare and slowly progressive disease. Methods . The PLS Natural History Study is a 30-site, 24-month, prospective study that is supported by multiple funding sources. The study aims to enroll 50 early PLS (disease duration ≤4 years) and 50 definite PLS (disease duration 4 to 15 years) participants using modified PLS Diagnostic Criteria. Smartphone-based assessments including semi-quantitative and quantitative measures and patient-reported outcomes are utilized. In-person quantitative measures are also completed during site visits. The change in the PLS Functional Rating Scale score is the primary outcome. The study utilizes the NeuroBANK ® patient-centric data capture and management platform. The biostatistical analysis plan has been developed. Results . In one year, 28 participants have been recruited. Enrollment has been much slower than anticipated due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the rarity of PLS, and potential study competition for internal resources from ALS clinical trials. Discussion . We discuss the need for more innovative methods to enroll and study individuals with such rare diseases and propose a number of mechanisms by which more efficient enrollment could be facilitated.

Objective: To evaluate safety, dose response, and preliminary efficacy of reldesemtiv over 12 weeks in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Methods: Patients (≤2 years since diagnosis) with slow upright vital capacity (SVC) of ≥60% were randomized 1:1:1:1 to reldesemtiv 150, 300, or 450 mg twice daily (bid) or placebo; active treatment was 12 weeks with 4-week follow-up. Primary endpoint was change in percent predicted SVC at 12 weeks; secondary measures included ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) and muscle strength mega-score. Results: Patients ( N  = 458) were enrolled; 85% completed 12-week treatment. The primary analysis failed to reach statistical significance ( p  = 0.11); secondary endpoints showed no statistically significant effects (ALSFRS-R, p  = 0.09; muscle strength mega-score, p  = 0.31). Post hoc analyses pooling all active reldesemtiv -treated patients compared against placebo showed trends toward benefit in all endpoints (progression rate for SVC, ALSFRS-R, and muscle strength mega-score (nominal p values of 0.10, 0.01 and 0.20 respectively)). Reldesemtiv was well tolerated, with nausea and fatigue being the most common side effects. A dose-dependent decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate was noted, and transaminase elevations were seen in approximately 5% of patients. Both hepatic and renal abnormalities trended toward resolution after study drug discontinuation. Conclusions: Although the primary efficacy analysis did not demonstrate statistical significance, there were trends favoring reldesemtiv for all three endpoints, with effect sizes generally regarded as clinically important. Tolerability was good; modest hepatic and renal abnormalities were reversible. The impact of reldesemtiv on patients with ALS should be assessed in a pivotal Phase 3 trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03160898).

Objective: To determine the associations between plasma creatinine (PCr), plasma uric acid (PUA), and urinary oxidative stress (OS) biomarkers with the ALSFRS-R at baseline and survival in a large epidemiological cohort study (ALS COSMOS) with a well-phenotyped patient population ( N  = 355). Methods: Fasting plasma and first void urine samples were obtained. PCr, PUA, urinary 8-oxo-deoxy guanosine (8-oxodG), and 15-F 2t -isoprostane (IsoP) were analyzed at baseline, near the midpoint of follow-up, and at the final blood draw (before death or withdrawal from study). We estimated associations between these biomarkers and the ALSFRS-R at baseline and survival. Results: At baseline, PCr correlated with ALSFRS-R (Spearman r  = 0.30), percent (%) FVC ( r  = 0.20), PUA ( r  = 0.37), and 8-oxodG ( r = -0.13, all p  < 0.05). Baseline PCr significantly predicted survival (adjusted hazard ratio 0.28, p  < 0.001). Time to death from baseline was shortest for those in the lowest two PCr quartiles relative to the highest two quartiles. PCr and ALSFRS-R values were significantly correlated at all three time points (baseline: r  = 0.29, midpoint: r  = 0.23, final: r  = 0.38, all p  < 0.001). PCr and PUA significantly declined over time, whereas OS biomarkers significantly increased over time. Conclusions: To date, PCr predicted survival the best, compared to PUA, 8-oxodG, and IsoP. Although PCr represents the degree of muscle mass, it may also represent complex biochemical changes in ALS. Because the field has no reliable prognostic biomarkers, the importance of PCr warrants further investigation through clinical studies in ALS.

Purpose : This research aimed to automatically predict intelligible speaking rate for individuals with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) based on speech acoustic and articulatory samples. Method : Twelve participants with ALS and two normal subjects produced a total of 1831 phrases. NDI Wave system was used to collect tongue and lip movement and acoustic data synchronously. A machine learning algorithm (i.e. support vector machine) was used to predict intelligible speaking rate (speech intelligibility × speaking rate) from acoustic and articulatory features of the recorded samples. Result : Acoustic, lip movement, and tongue movement information separately, yielded a R 2 of 0.652, 0.660, and 0.678 and a Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) of 41.096, 41.166, and 39.855 words per minute (WPM) between the predicted and actual values, respectively. Combining acoustic, lip and tongue information we obtained the highest R 2 (0.712) and the lowest RMSE (37.562 WPM). Conclusion : The results revealed that our proposed analyses predicted the intelligible speaking rate of the participant with reasonably high accuracy by extracting the acoustic and/or articulatory features from one short speech sample. With further development, the analyses may be well-suited for clinical applications that require automatic speech severity prediction.

Objective: The aim of this Symposium was to develop a consensus based, bulbar assessment protocol for implementation within NEALS clinics., Methods: A one-day symposium, held in April 2017, was organized into Speech and Swallowing sections to establish summary recommendations for the assessment of bulbar dysfunction within each group., Results: Summary recommendations included speech referrals and AAC evaluations at initial visit, CNS-BFS, maximum sustained phonation, and speaking rate. Dysarthria evaluation included the speech subsystem involvement of respiration, phonation, resonance, and articulation. Specific recommendations for swallowing were established for each of the following domains: dietary/oral intake, airway defense physiologic capacity, swallow safety screen, patient-reported swallow-related outcomes, oral sensorimotor exam, and pulmonary function. Practice parameters focused upon patient education and unresolved questions included the use of videofluoscopy, monitoring diet progression, and swallow safety screening., Conclusions: The working goal is to establish a clinical bulbar protocol, designed to be incorporated within ALS clinics and ultimately to formulate a best practice set of bulbar ALS guidelines, available for implementation throughout the international ALS community.

Substantial disparities in TIV utilization rates among ALS patients have been observed, with rates in Japan far exceeding rates in the United States. Our objective was to elicit national preferences and their determinants. We predicted more Japanese than American patients would desire TIV, as would sicker patients, those already using non-invasive interventions, and those with more positive mood and outlook. Patients were enrolled in five U.S. states and six Japanese regions. Eligible patients completed surveys during clinic visits (U.S.) or at home (Japan). Survey responses were in multiple-choice format and took about 15 min to complete. One hundred and fifty-six Americans and 66 Japanese patients participated. Contrary to expectations, Japanese patients were more likely to oppose TIV, as were those on 24-h NIV and patients who knew someone using TIV. Most Japanese and American patients with advanced respiratory impairment were undecided or opposed to TIV, while nearly 20% in both countries were in favor. Finally, patients who favored TIV or who were undecided had more energy, greater wish to live, and more sense of control over ALS management. In conclusion, factors other than patient preferences, such as neurologist preferences, caregiver attitudes and perhaps lack of advance planning, may influence probability of TIV utilization.

Abstract In a multicenter study of newly diagnosed ALS patients without a reported family history of ALS, we are prospectively investigating whether markers of oxidative stress (OS) are associated with disease progression. Methods utilize an extensive structured telephone interview ascertaining environmental, lifestyle, dietary and psychological risk factors associated with OS. Detailed assessments were performed at baseline and at 3-6 month intervals during the ensuing 30 months. Our biorepository includes DNA, plasma, urine, and skin. Three hundred and fifty-five patients were recruited. Subjects were enrolled over a 36-month period at 16 sites. To meet the target number of subjects, the recruitment period was prolonged and additional sites were included. Results showed that demographic and disease characteristics were similar between 477 eligible/non-enrolled and enrolled patients, the only difference being type of health insurance among enrolled patients. Sites were divided into three groups by the number of enrolled subjects. Comparing these three groups, the Columbia site had fewer 'definite ALS' diagnoses. This is the first prospective, interdisciplinary, in-depth, multicenter epidemiological investigation of OS related to ALS progression and has been accomplished by an aggressive recruitment process. The baseline demographic and disease features of the study sample are now fully characterized.

To promote clinical and patient oriented research, as part of the Second International ALS Conference in Tarrytown, NY, USA, seven pairs of clinicians and scientists were asked to lead discussions with meeting attendees on six major topics (one of which was discussed by two groups); each one the focus of a 90-min Breakout Session. Approximately 25 meeting attendees participated in each session. The Breakout Sessions considered six major themes: 1) Approaches to encourage clinicians to engage in more clinical research to discover the pathogenesis and cause of ALS; 2) Exploring avenues to build more effective partnerships between basic scientists and ALS physicians; 3) Increasing patient interest and commitment to participating in non-trial clinical research; 4) Brainstorming about factors that are most critical to the discovery of the pathogenesis and cause of ALS; 5) Finding ways to incorporate clinical research projects into clinical trials; and 6) Developing state-of-the-art epidemiological studies to solve the mystery of ALS. In this paper, we present the reports from each of the Breakout Sessions; and we provide a wrap-up of the entire conference.