Search

Background : Recent cost-utility analysis (CUA) models for onasemnogene abeparvovec (Zolgensma®, formerly AVXS-101) in spinal muscular atrophy type 1 (SMA1) differ on key assumptions and results. Objective : To compare the manufacturer's proprietary CUA model to the model published by the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER), and to update the manufacturer's model with long-term follow-up data and some key ICER assumptions. Study design : We updated a recent CUA evaluating value for money in cost per incremental Quality-adjusted Life Year (QALY) of onasemnogene abeparvovec versus nusinersen (Spinraza®) or best supportive care (BSC) in symptomatic SMA1 patients, and compared it to the ICER model. Setting/Perspective : USA/Commercial payer Participants : Children aged <2 years with SMA1. Interventions : Onasemnogene abeparvovec, a single-dose gene replacement therapy, versus nusinersen, an antisense oligonucleotide, versus BSC. Main outcome measure : Incremental-cost effectiveness ratio and value-based price using traditional thresholds for general medicines in the US. Results : Updated survival (undiscounted) predicted by the model was 37.60 years for onasemnogene abeparvovec compared to 12.10 years for nusinersen and 7.27 years for BSC. Updated quality-adjusted survival using ICER's utility scores and discounted at 3% were 13.33, 2.85, and 1.15 discounted QALYs for onasemnogene abeparvovec, nusinersen, and BSC, respectively. Using estimated net prices, the discounted lifetime cost/patient was $3.93 M for onasemnogene abeparvovec, $4.60 M for nusinersen, and $1.96 M for BSC. The incremental cost per QALY gained for onasemnogene abeparvovec was dominant against nusinersen and $161,648 against BSC. These results broadly align with the results of the ICER model, which predicted a cost per QALY gained of $139,000 compared with nusinersen, and $243,000 compared with BSC (assuming a placeholder price of $2 M for onasemnogene abeparvovec), differences in methodology notwithstanding. Exploratory analyses in presymptomatic patients were similar. Conclusion : This updated CUA model is similar to ICER analyses comparing onasemnogene abeparvovec with nusinersen in the symptomatic and presymptomatic SMA populations. At a list price of $2.125 M, onasemnogene abeparvovec is cost-effective compared to nusinersen for SMA1 patients treated before age 2 years. When compared to BSC, cost per QALY of onasemnogene abeparvovec is higher than commonly used thresholds for therapies in the USA ($150,000 per QALY)., Competing Interests: Rebecca Dean, Ivar Jensen, Phil Cyr and Beckley Miller are employees of PRECISIONheor and PRECISIONheor received funding for the analysis from Novartis Gene Therapies. Benit Maru and Thomas Wiesner are employees of SSI Strategy, who were contracted to support Novartis Gene Therapies. Douglas M. Sproule, Douglas E. Feltner are former employees of Novartis Gene Therapies. Omar Dabbous, Matthias Bischof and Walter Toro are employees of Novartis Gene Therapies. Daniel C. Malone is a consultant to Novartis., (© The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.)

Background : Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a rare genetic neuromuscular disease. Objective : Characterize direct costs associated with SMA management. Data source : Truven Health Analytics MarketScan claims data (2012-2016). Patients : Eligible patients had ≥2 SMA-related medical claims ≥30 days apart. Patients were matched (1:1) to controls by birth year, gender, and geographic region. Patients were categorized as having infantile, child, or juvenile SMA based on diagnosis at age <1, 1-3, or 3-18 years, respectively. Main outcome measures : Annual inpatient and outpatient insurance claims and costs (2019 USD) for cases versus controls. Results : Fifty-eight, 56, and 279 cases and controls comprised the infantile, child, and juvenile cohorts, respectively. Cases had more inpatient claims than controls (infantile: 60.3% vs 1.7%; child: 35.7% vs 3.6%; juvenile: 47.0% vs 4.3%; all P ≤ 0.002). Mean net payments for inpatient admissions were higher for cases versus controls (infantile: $118,609.00 vs $58.79; child: $26,940.01 vs $143.56; juvenile: $39,389.91 vs $701.21; all P ≤ 0.01), as were mean net payments for outpatient services (infantile: $55,537.83 vs $2,047.20; child: $73,093.66 vs $1,307.56; juvenile: $49,067.83 vs $1,134.69; all P ≤ 0.0002). Conclusions : Direct costs of SMA are tremendous, often >50-fold higher compared with matched controls. Efforts are needed to reduce costs through improved standards of care., Competing Interests: Lisa Belter, Rosángel Cruz, and Jill Jarecki are employees of Cure SMA. Sierra Kulas and Omar Dabbous are employees of Novartis Gene Therapies, a Novartis Company, and own stock in Novartis. Emily McGinnis is a former employee of Novartis and owns stock in Novartis., (© 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.)

Objective : To provide recommendations for addressing previously identified key challenges in health economic evaluations of Gene Replacement Therapies (GRTs), including: 1) the assessment of clinical effectiveness; 2) the valuation of health outcomes; 3) the time horizon and extrapolation of effects beyond trial duration; 4) the estimation of costs; 5) the selection of appropriate discount rates; 6) the incorporation of broader elements of value; and 7) affordability. Methods : A literature review on economic evaluations of GRT was performed. Interviews were conducted with 8 European and US health economic experts with experience in evaluations of GRT. Targeted literature reviews were conducted to investigate further potential solutions to specific challenges. Recommendations : Experts agreed on factors to be considered to ensure the acceptability of historical cohorts by HTA bodies. Existing prospective registries or, if not available, retrospective registries, may be used to analyse different disease trajectories and inform extrapolations. The importance of expert opinion due to limited data was acknowledged. Expert opinion should be obtained using structured elicitation techniques. Broader elements of value, beyond health gains directly related to treatment, can be considered through the application of a factor to inflate the quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) or a higher cost-effectiveness threshold. Additionally, the use of cost-benefit analysis and saved young life equivalents (SAVE) were proposed as alternatives to QALYs for the valuations of outcomes of GRT as they can incorporate broader elements of value and avoid problems of eliciting utilities for paediatric diseases. Conclusions : While some of the limitations of economic evaluations of GRT are inherent to limited clinical data and lack of experience with these treatments, others may be addressed by methodological research to be conducted by health economists., Competing Interests: FUF reports personal fees and non-financial support from Novartis Gene Therapies (formerly AveXis, Inc.), outside the submitted work. DM reports personal fees from Novartis Gene Therapies (formerly AveXis, Inc.), outside the submitted work. OD is an employee of Novartis Gene Therapies (formerly AveXis, Inc.), a company which commercialises gene therapies. MP reports grants and personal fees from various pharmaceutical industries, all outside the submitted work. He holds stocks in Ingress Health and Pharmacoeconomics Advice Groningen (PAG Ltd) and is an advisor to Asc Academics, all pharmacoeconomic consultancy companies. SA, KT, CF, AM, and MT are employees of Creativ-Ceutical or were employed by Creativ-Ceutical at the time of the development of the guidelines. Creativ-Ceutical is a consulting company in the field of health economics. All other authors report no conflict of interest., (© 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.)

Aims: To estimate healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs among patients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) type 1 (SMA1) in real-world practice, overall and among patients treated with nusinersen. As a secondary objective, HRU and costs were estimated among patients with other SMA types (i.e. 2, 3, or 4 combined), overall and among patients treated with nusinersen. Materials and methods: Patients with SMA were identified from the Symphony Health's Integrated Dataverse (IDV) open claims database (September 1, 2016-August 31, 2018) and were classified into four cohorts based on SMA type and nusinersen treatment (i.e. SMA1, SMA1 nusinersen, other SMA, and other SMA nusinersen cohorts). The index date was the date of the first SMA diagnosis after December 23, 2016 or, for nusinersen cohorts, the date of nusinersen initiation. The study period spanned from the index date to the earlier among the end of clinical activity or data availability. Results: Patients in the SMA1 ( n  = 349) and SMA1 nusinersen ( n  = 45) cohorts experienced an average of 59.4 and 56.6 days with medical visits per-patient-per-year (PPPY), respectively, including 14.1 and 4.6 inpatient days. Excluding nusinersen-related costs, total mean healthcare costs were $137,627 and $92,618 PPPY in the SMA1 and SMA1 nusinersen cohorts, respectively. Mean nusinersen-related costs were $191,909 per-patient-per-month (PPPM) for the first 3 months post-initiation (i.e. loading phase) and $36,882 PPPM thereafter (i.e. maintenance phase). HRU and costs were also substantial among patients in the other SMA ( n  = 5,728) and other SMA nusinersen ( n  = 404) cohorts, with an average of 44.5 and 63.7 days with medical visits PPPY and total mean healthcare costs (excluding nusinersen-related costs) of $49,175 and $76,371 PPPY, respectively. Limitations: The database may contain inaccuracies or omissions in diagnoses, procedures, or costs, and does not capture medical services outside of the IDV network. Conclusions: HRU and healthcare costs were substantial in patients with SMA, including in nusinersen-treated patients.

Background : Spinal muscular atrophy type 1 (SMA1) is a devastating genetic disease for which gene-replacement therapy may bring substantial survival and quality of life benefits. Objective : This study investigated the cost-effectiveness of onasemnogene abeparvovec (AVXS-101) gene-replacement therapy for SMA1. Study design : A Markov model was used to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), expressed as cost/quality-adjusted life year ($/QALY), of AVXS-101 versus nusinersen over a lifetime. Survival, healthcare costs and QALYs were estimated using natural history data for SMA patients who achieved motor milestones (sitting/walking). Health utility weights were obtained from the CHERISH trial. Setting : USA; commercial payer perspective Participants : SMA1 infants Interventions : AVXS-101 was compared to nusinersen. Main outcome measure : The primary outcome was the ICER. Results : Expected survival (undiscounted) over a lifetime predicted by the model was 37.20 life years for AVXS-101 and 9.68 for nusinersen (discounted QALYs, 15.65 and 5.29, respectively). Using a potential AVXS-101 price range ($2.5-5.0M/treatment), the average lifetime cost/patient was $4.2-6.6M for AVXS-101 and $6.3M for nusinersen. The ICER range was (-$203,072) to $31,379 per QALY gained for AVXS-101 versus nusinersen, indicating that AVXS-101 was cost-effective with prices of ≤$5M. Conclusion : Single-dose AVXS-101 was cost-effective compared to chronic nusinersen for SMA1 patients.