Search

With the introduction of immunomodulatory drugs, proteasome inhibitors, and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies, major improvements have been achieved in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM), with a significant impact on the outcome of this disease. Different treatment combinations are now in use and other therapies are being developed. Based on an extensive review of the recent literature, we propose practical recommendations on myeloma management, to be used by hematologists as a reference for daily practice.

The prognostic value of interim (18)fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (i-PET) was investigated in 73 patients (median age 60 years) with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). i-PET was analyzed using the Deauville score (DS) and change in maximum standardized uptake value (ΔSUV(max)). Patients with a DS of 1-3 demonstrated a significantly (p < 0.0001) better outcome (median follow-up 2.4 years) than patients with a score of 4 or 5 in terms of event-free survival (EFS) (79% vs. 36%), progression-free survival (PFS) (84% vs. 47%) and overall survival (OS) (91% vs. 51%). EFS (73% vs. 42%), PFS (78% vs. 50%) and OS (88% vs. 56%) were also significantly (p = 0.023) different between patients with ΔSUV(max) > 66% or ≤ 66%. Patients (n = 33) combining a favorable age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (IPI) (0 or 1) and a negative i-PET either by DS or ΔSUV(max) criteria showed a particularly good outcome (EFS: 85%, PFS: 88%, OS: 94%). Overall, i-PET was highly and independently predictive of any outcome, and its negative predictive value was improved by combination with IPI.

The prognosis of multiple myeloma patients has significantly improved since the introduction of the novel agents thalidomide, bortezomib and lenalidomide. We report the data of a medical need programme with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone, conducted in Belgium between August 2007 and March 2008, and including 98 relapsed refractory multiple myeloma patients. In addition to chemotherapy and steroids, all patients had received prior treatment with bortezomib, and 84% of them had been exposed to thalidomide. In 52 patients response data could be retrieved by post-hoc analysis. A partial remission or better was achieved in 52% (49% partial and 3% complete response) of patients, despite a median of 5 previous anti-myeloma treatment lines. Responses were rapid while the majority of patients received lenalidomide with once weekly (also called low-dose) dexamethasone. Treatment with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone did prolong overall survival by nearly half a year in this population with end-stage myeloma. Overall response and quality of response were independent of previous response to thalidomide and bortezomib, although the time to progression tended to be shorter in thalidomide- and bortezomib-refractory patients. It can be concluded that lenalidomide plus dexamethasone is an effective and safe treatment regimen in highly refractory multiple myeloma patients, and that these responses are irrespective of previous exposure or sensitivity to thalidomide and bortezomib.

Since the introduction of novel therapeutic agents including thalidomide, lenalidomide and bortezomib, the prognosis of multiple myeloma (MM) has significantly improved. These agents have been incorporated into numerous treatment schedules for newly diagnosed as well as more advanced MM patients. Hence, the therapeutic options for MM have become more complex and subject to rapid changes. The multiple myeloma study group (MMSG) of the Belgian Hematological Society has established recommendations for the treatment of MM as based on an extensive review of the literature which is also summarized in this paper. The recommendations are the result of a consensus opinion between haematologists with experience in the field and representing most haematology centres in Belgium. Where applicable, reimbursement criteria are also taken into account. The consensus recommendations should be a reference for use by clinical haematologists in daily practice.

Secondary acute lymphoblastic leukemia (sALL) is an uncommon condition and sALL with L3 morphology is still less frequent. Here, we compare the characteristics of available cases of L3 sALL (16 patients, including 12 previously published cases and 4 personal cases) to those of de novo L3 ALL and of non L3 sALL. Two patients with L3 sALL obtained a CR after aggressive treatment of their leukemia. Compared with 24 patients from the literature with de novo L3 ALL, L3 sALL patients were characterized by an older age (median 46 vs. 29.5 years, p = 0.0003) and by a poor prognosis (complete responses: 2/16 vs. 19/24, p = 0.0001, median survival: 0.46 month vs. undetermined, p < 0.0001). In comparison with 19 patients from the literature with non L3 sALL, L3 sALL patients were characterized by a high Male/Female ratio (14/2 vs. 8/11, p = 0.01), a frequent history of Hodgkin's disease (12/16 vs. 7/19, p = 0.04) and, again, by a poor prognosis (complete responses: 2/16 vs. 13/18, p = 0.0001, median survival 0.46 vs. 13 months, p = 0.001). In conclusion, though based on a small group of heterogeneously treated patients, some characteristics of L3 sALL, seem to emerge, compared both with de novo L3 ALL and with non L3 sALL, the most prominent being its extremely poor prognosis.