Search

This study was performed in order to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a new handheld home-use multisource radiofrequency device on facial rejuvenation. Forty-seven male and female subjects were enrolled. All subjects received a NEWA®3DEEP™home-use device (EndyMed Medical, Caesarea, Israel) to be used on facial skin three times per week for the first four weeks and then reduced to two times per week for the following eight weeks. Assessments included expert clinical grading for efficacy, instrumental evaluation, image analysis, and photography. Forty-five subjects completed the study; all subjects reported the treatment to be painless with only mild erythema lasting up to 15 minutes post-treatment. No other adverse events were reported. Statistically significant improvements were noted in the appearance of marionette lines, skin brightness, elasticity, firmness, lift (facial), lift (jawline), texture/smoothness, tone, and radiance/luminosity by expert visual assessment. Statistically significant improvements in skin firmness and elasticity were found using a Cutometer MPA 580, as well as in collagen and hemoglobin content of the skin using a SIAscope. The results of this study indicate that the NEWA®multisource radiofrequency home-use device is effective in self-administered skin rejuvenation. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Background: Carboxytherapy (CA) refers to the cutaneous and subcutaneous administration of CO2 for therapeutic purposes. Radiofrequency (RF) is a method that uses electric current for heating layers of the skin. Both techniques are indicated for the treatment of skin laxity. Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of CA and RF on human skin. Methods: After eight patients underwent abdominoplasty, each of them received a single treatment of CA and a single treatment of RF on the right and left infra-umbilical regions, respectively. In the infra-umbilical region, CA was performed on the right and RF was performed on the left side. Untreated skin was used as a control. The sample collection period lasted 120 days. CA was administered at a velocity of 40 mL/min, and the total quantity of CO2 infused was approximately 20 mL. RF was carried out at a temperature higher than 40°C on the epidermis for 5 min. Results: CA and RF led to collagen remodeling; however, this result was more evident and lasted longer with RF. With CA an increase in elastic fibers was observed, whereas with RF no alteration was observed. Conclusion : Our results suggest that RF is more efficient than CA in stimulating collagen synthesis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: A number of lasers and light-based devices have been reported as promising treatment options for acne vulgaris. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of fractional microneedle radiofrequency (MRF) device treatment compared to CO2 fractional laser system (FS) for the treatment of acne vulgaris. Methods: Twenty healthy subjects underwent full-face treatment for acne vulgaris with CO2 FS and MRF device. For each subject, two passes of CO2 FS with a pulse energy setting of 80 mJ and a density of 100 spots/cm2 were used on one side, and two passes of MRF device with a intensity of 8, density of 25 MTZ/cm2, and a depth of 1.5-2.5 mm were used on the other. Patients were evaluated 3 months postoperatively and were also photographed. Results: Most of the patients improved based on clinical and photographic assessments 3 months after the treatment. No significant differences in physician-measured parameters, patient ratings, or intraoperative pain ratings were found, although downtime was significantly longer for the CO2 FS treated side. Conclusions: MRF device and CO2 FS can be used for acne vulgaris patients and MRF device is more convenient than CO2 FS because of its short downtime. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]