Search

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of nivolumab in the second-line (2L) or later-line (LL) treatment of patients with locally advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in real-life setting in Türkiye. This study was designed as a national, multi-center, retrospective study. The study population was evaluated in two groups for the line of nivolumab therapy: those receiving nivolumab in the 2L (Group 2L) and third-line (3L) or LL (Group 3L/LL). Efficacy was evaluated based on one-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Safety was evaluated based on treatment-related adverse events (AEs) and nivolumab discontinuation rate. Of 244 patients, 52.9% were in Group 2L and 47.1% were in Group 3L/LL. Demographic and clinical characteristics did not differ between the groups. In Group 2L and Group 3L/LL, one-year OS and PFS rates were 60.8% and 61.4% (p = 0.592) and 31.2% and 21.3% (p = 0.078), respectively. The objective response rate (ORR) was 34.7% in Group 2L and 27.3% in Group 3L/LL (p = 0.262). The percentage of patients reporting at least one AE in Groups 2L and 3L/LL was 34.9% and 43.5%, respectively (p = 0.169). Fatigue was the most common (16.4%) treatment-related AE in each group. The groups were comparable regarding the AE frequency. Nivolumab was discontinued in 61 patients in Group 2L and 53 patients in Group 3L/LL, with the most common reason being disease progression (57.4% and 66.0%, respectively). Nivolumab is safe and effective in the 2L or 3L/LL treatment of locally advanced/metastatic NSCLC and associated with acceptable AEs in real-life setting. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common type of lung cancer (around 85% of all lung cancers). Patients with NSCLC are usually diagnosed at advanced or metastatic stages. When cancer cells spread to other areas from where they first formed, it is called metastatic cancer. Surgery may not be a treatment option for such patients. Currently, immunotherapeutic agents are used in the treatment of NSCLC. Nivolumab is one of the approved immunotherapeutic agents in the treatment of patients with metastatic NSCLC, who have failed after receiving chemotherapy. Our study explored the efficacy and safety of nivolumab in real-life setting in Türkiye. Nivolumab effectiveness was evaluated by overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates. OS indicates the proportion of patients who are still alive at a given time after diagnosis or treatment initiation. PFS refers to "the length of time during and after cancer treatment that a person lives with the disease but does not get worse." In the present study, one-year OS for 244 patients who received nivolumab was 61.1% and one-year PFS was 26.4%. Nivolumab safety was evaluated based on the frequency of adverse events observed during nivolumab therapy. Of the patients 38.9% had at least one side effect, with fatigue being the most common (16.4%). Our results support the earlier studies and showed that nivolumab was a safe and effective agent and is associated with acceptable side effects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article "Serum Chemerin and Vaspin in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease," by M. Kukla and colleagues in an earlier issue.

Objectives: Advanced stage biliary tract cancers (BTC) are rare malignancies with poor prognosis. There are few prospective trials, but several retrospective studies regarding treatment options. In this study, we aimed to investigate the role of systemic inflammatory parameters (SIP) and other possible independent factors that may affect survival and treatment approaches and to determine the benefit of later-line treatments in these patients.Methods: A total of 284 patients, initially diagnosed with advanced stage or progressed after curative treatment of BTC, from different oncology centers in Turkey were included in this retrospective study. The prognostic significance of clinicopathological factors, SIPs and treatment options was analyzed.Results: At a median follow-up of 13 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.1 months (95% CI:5.51-6.82), and the median overall-survival (OS) time was 16.8 months (95% CI: 13.9-19.6). Treatment choice (p < 0.001 HR:0.70 CI95% 0.55-0.9), performance status (p < 0.001 HR:2.74 CI 95% 2.12-3.54) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (p = 0.02 HR:1.38 CI 95% 1.03-1.84) were independent prognostic factors for PFS. For OS, the independent prognostic indicators were determined as The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) (p < 0.001 HR:1.78 CI 95% 1.5-2.3), Systemic Immune-inflammation Index (SII) (p < 0.001 HR:0.51 CI95% 0.36-0.73) and stage at diagnosis (p = 0.002 HR:1.79 CI 95% 1.24-2.59). Furthermore, second and third line treatments significantly prolonged OS in advanced BTC (p < 0.001 HR:0.55 CI 95% 0.38-0.79; p = 0.007 HR:0.51 CI95% 0.31-0.83, respectively).Conclusion: SII and NLR are useful prognostic factors and may be helpful in making treatment decisions. Additionally, second and later-line treatments in advanced BTC have a significant impact on survival under real-life conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of short-term hypobaric hypoxic conditions (STHC) on intraocular pressure (IOP) in healthy subjects. Methods: The study group was comprised of 30 healthy participants (60 eyes) with a mean age of 24.8 years. IOP was measured with a Tono-Pen XL tonometer at ground level (792 m above sea level, prehypoxic) during hypobaric hypoxic exposure (equivalent to 9144 m) and at ground level again after this exposure (post-hypoxic). For each condition, the mean of 3 consecutive measurements of IOP was calculated. In each condition, central corneal thickness was also measured. Results: IOP in the hypobaric hypoxic condition (18.23 ± 2.84 mmHg) was significantly greater than IOP in both the prehypoxic condition (16.52 ± 2.84 mmHg) (p < 0.001) and the post-hypoxic condition (17.02 ± 2.52 mmHg) (p < 0.01). When corrected for hypoxia-related changes in CCT, IOP under hypobaric hypoxic conditions was still greater than IOP in both the prehypoxic and post-hypoxic conditions. There was no significant difference between IOP levels in the prehypoxic and post-hypoxic conditions (p > 0.05). Conclusion: STHC caused a significant increase in IOP in healthy participants. But this significant increase in IOP cannot be solely explained by a CCT-related overestimation error due to the increase in CCT. Individuals with IOP-related disorders such as glaucoma should be cautious when facing potential exposure to hypobaric hypoxic conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]