Search

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common subtype of mature B-cell lymphoma. While the majority of patients are cured with immunochemotherapy incorporating the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab (R-CHOP), relapsed and refractory patients still have a dismal prognosis. DLBCL subtypes including an aggressive activated B-cell-like (ABC) and a more favorable prognosis germinal center-like (GCB) DLBCL have been identified by gene expression profiling and are characterized by distinct genetic abnormalities and oncogenic pathways. This identification of novel molecular targets is now enabling clinical trials to evaluate more effective personalized approaches to DLBCL therapy. The forkhead transcription factor FOXP1 is highly expressed in the ABC-DLBCL gene signature and has been extensively studied within the context of DLBCL for more than a decade. Here, we review the significance of FOXP1 in the pathogenesis of DLBCL, summarizing data supporting its utility as a prognostic and subtyping marker, its targeting by genetic aberrations, the importance of specific isoforms, and emerging data demonstrating a functional role in lymphoma biology. FOXP1 is one of the critical transcription factors whose deregulated expression makes important contributions to DLBCL pathogenesis. Thus, FOXP1 warrants further study as a potential theranostic in ABC-DLBCL. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

The risk of developing non-Hodgkin lymphoma increases with age, yet elderly patients are under-represented in clinical trials. Here, we evaluate a combination regimen including ifosfamide, carboplatin and etoposide with or without rituximab (ICE ± R) in 32 fit elderly patients (median age 75.6 years) with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. ICE ± R was generally administered in reduced doses and was well tolerated. The overall response rate (ORR) was 53.1% with a complete response (CR) rate of 40.6%. The median progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 3.9 and 17.0 months, respectively. Patients who responded to ICE ± R achieved median PFS of 47.2 months and OS of 78.9 months. Patients ineligible for autologous transplantation who responded to ICE ± R were treated with additional cycles, and achieved a median PFS of 18.9 months and OS of 21.7 months. Previous response to first-line therapy was the strongest predictor of response, PFS and OS to second-line treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) following rituximab (R)-containing chemotherapy for lymphoma is a major concern, and risk factors remain to be defined. We enrolled 190 patients diagnosed with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and resolved hepatitis B, receiving first-line R-CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone)-based regimens. Twenty-seven patients (14.2%) developed HBV reactivation during a median follow-up of 23.6 months. Two independent risk factors were identified: cycles of rituximab > 8 (hazard ratio [HR], 2.797; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.184–6.612) and lymphocyte/monocyte ratio (LMR) < 2.50 (HR, 2.733; 95% CI, 1.122–6.657). Two-year overall survival in patients with or without HBV reactivation was 53.8% vs. 77.6% (p= 0.025). Regarding the negative impact on clinical outcome, patients at “super high risk” of HBV reactivation, including those receiving more than eight cycles of R and having low LMR at diagnosis, may warrant first priority for antiviral prophylaxis. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common form of aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma, accounting for 30-40% of newly diagnosed cases. Obesity is a well-defined risk factor for DLBCL. However, the impact of body mass index (BMI) on DLBCL prognosis is controversial. Recent studies suggest that skeletal muscle wasting (sarcopenia) or loss of fat mass can be detected by computed tomography (CT) images and is useful for predicting the clinical outcome in several types of cancer including DLBCL. Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain the differences in DLBCL outcome according to BMI or weight that include tolerance to treatment, inflammatory background and chemotherapy or rituximab metabolism. In this review, we summarize the available literature, addressing the impact and physiopathological relevance of simple anthropometric tools including BMI and tissue distribution measurements. We also discuss their relationship with other nutritional parameters and their potential role in the management of patients with DLBCL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Novelty and Impact: This first study compares the survival of HCV-positive DLBCL treated with and without rituximab which showed in toxicity and the outcome. Background: The effect of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection on prognosis and hepatic toxicity in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in the rituximab era is unclear. The treatment and the outcome of patients with DLBCL and HCV infection are still a matter of debate. Methods: We analyzed 137 DLBCL patients positive to HCV, treated with chemotherapy regimens include cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) ± rituximab. Survival outcomes and hepatic toxicity were compared in DLBCL patients positive to HCV infection according to CHOP ± rituximab. Result: Our result showed that the group of patients treated with R-CHOP has significant high incidence of hepatic toxicity grade (3–4) (28 vs. 18%, P value 0.001) and worse progression-free survival (55 vs. 80%, P value 0.002) in comparison with the group treated with CHOP, and also there is significant difference between both groups in overall survival. This first study compares the survival of HCV-positive DLBCL treated with and without rituximab which showed significant differences. Conclusion:We conclude that HCV-positive patients with DLBCL treated with rituximab plus CHOP have high incidence in hepatic toxicity. Specific protocols evaluating antiviral therapy should be designed for these patients [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The impact of rituximab (R) on the incidence of central nervous system (CNS) relapse of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is unclear. We performed a meta-analysis to explore the risk factors and assess the association between R-chemotherapy (R-chemo) and CNS relapse. We searched MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE and OVID for eligible studies. Published group statistics were extracted from each study for analysis; individual patient data from each study were not accessed. Fixed- or random-effects models were used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Eight studies were identified. The OR for R-chemo compared with identical chemotherapy was 0.70 (95% CI 0.54-0.91). Stage III/IV (OR 2.25, 95% CI 1.64-3.08), International Prognostic Index (IPI) > 1 (OR 2.62, 95% CI 1.59-4.33), performance status (PS) > 1 (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.23-2.27), elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (OR 2.23, 95% CI 1.54-3.22), bone marrow involvement (OR 2.85, 95% CI 1.99-4.07), more than one extranodal involvement (OR 2.61, 95% CI 1.93-3.54), presence of B symptoms (OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.37-2.56) and testicular involvement (OR 3.83, 95% CI 1.84-7.97) were associated with increased risks of CNS relapse. This meta-analysis demonstrated a lower incidence of CNS relapse of DLBCL in the rituximab era. The risk of CNS relapse can be assessed by stage, IPI, PS, LDH, presence of B symptoms, number of extranodal sites, bone marrow and testicular involvement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and it has several morphologic and clinicopathologic variants. The prognosis of DLBCL can vary according to specific genetic and immunophenotypic abnormalities. The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic impact of previously identified prognostic factors, such as activated B cell-like immunophenotype, CD5, BCL2 and MYC rearrangement (MYC-R), in patients treated with rituximab. We retrospectively analyzed the prognosis of 100 patients with DLBCL (median age, 66.5 years) treated with rituximab-containing chemotherapy. The 3-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 66% and 62%. Outcomes were significantly worse in patients with MYC-R in 3-year OS (50% vs. 67.8%, p = 0.043) and PFS (30% vs. 57.8%, p = 0.003), and multivariate analysis showed that this finding was independent of the International Prognostic Index (IPI). Immunostaining by Muris algorithm had the highest predictive power among the three algorithms. However, other previously reported prognostic factors, such as BCL2 and CD5, were not good predictors of outcomes in these patients. In conclusion, our data suggest that fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis for MYC-R can predict outcomes in response to rituximab-containing chemotherapy in Japanese patients with DLBCL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The beneficial effect of rituximab for first-line treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) has been demonstrated by several randomized controlled trials. To clarify whether results for selected patient populations also apply to unselected patients, we analyzed long-term outcomes for all the 277 consecutive adults diagnosed with de novo DLBCL in a single center between 1998 and 2008. The study population included 147 and 130 patients diagnosed before (Cohort A) and after the advent of rituximab (Cohort B). Progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly better for Cohort B than for Cohort A (P = 0.005). For patients age 60 or younger, PFS did not differ significantly between Cohort A and Cohort B (P = 0.329), but for patients over 60, Cohort B showed superior PFS (P = 0.002). Patients with high or high-intermediate risk according to the International Prognostic Index score showed less improvement in PFS than did those with low or low-intermediate risk primarily because of still unfavorable outcomes of patients with poor performance status. These results indicate that the advent of rituximab has significantly improved outcome for unselected patients with DLBCL, and that improvement was greater for older patients. Further investigations are warranted in the hope of improving outcomes for younger patients with DLBCL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma primary of lung (DLBCL-PL) is a rare presentation of extranodal lymphoma, in most cases chemotherapy-based anthracyclines: CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) has been the treatment, with excellent outcome. The addition of rituximab to CHOP (R-CHOP) has been considered the gold standard in the treatment of nodal DLBCL. Thus, we assess in a large number of cases of DLBCL-PL whether the use of R-CHOP could improve survival in this setting of patients. Forty-two patients with DLBCL-PL, stage IE, age 65 years or younger, were treated with standard R-CHOP, no consolidation radiotherapy or maintenance therapy were considered. They were matched with patients who received CHOP alone to assess efficacy and toxicity. Complete response was observed in 35 patients (83%), and 7 patients were considered failure (16%). The study has a median follow-up of 42.8 months. Actuarial curves at 5 years showed that progression-free survival was 88 % and overall survival was 70 %. The results were not statistically different when compared retrospectively with patients who received CHOP alone. Treatment was well tolerated. The addition of rituximab to chemotherapy did not improve outcome in patients with DLBCL-PL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the rituximab era, the optimal treatment modality for primary gastric diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (PG-DLBCL) still remains unclear. We performed a retrospective, multicenter analysis of 65 patients with PG-DLBCL to assess the efficacy and toxicity of the addition of rituximab to conventional chemotherapy. When compared with conventional chemotherapy, there was a trend that rituximab plus chemotherapy yielded a higher complete response rate, 5-year event-free survival (EFS) rate and 5-year overall survival (OS) rate, but this was not statistically significant. In subgroup analysis, better OS was observed only for patients with advanced-stage disease when rituximab was added. When involved-field radiotherapy (IFRT) was included, EFS and OS were significantly prolonged in the conventional chemotherapy group, but not in the immunochemotherapy group. If focusing on patients with localized-stage disease receiving immunochemotherapy, the efficacies of short-course rituximab (R)-chemotherapy plus IFRT and 6-8 courses of R-chemotherapy without IFRT were comparable. In conclusion, it is necessary to carry out prospective randomized trials to help further illuminate the role of rituximab in the PG-DLBCL treatment landscape. If a patient has been treated with a non-rituximab-containing regimen, additional IFRT should be considered, and for patients with advanced-stage disease, rituximab should be considered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]